Atlas Shrugged
discussion
A Theory
date
newest »


I have more liberal minded friends that say they have read the book but then state that they didn't like the book because of the philosophy. While hyperbole, the fact that these people can't see the flaws or concerns of the socialist philosophy in the book is kind of scary.
My biggest criticism of the book is how redundant it is. I understood the philosophy as it was presented and the motor company example was entertaining, but I didn't need the philosophy hammered home another 250 times and then again in a 3 hour speech. I kept thinking, "okay, I get it."
Overall it was a pretty amazing book, especially when the authors background is taken into account. I don't think it necessarily ages well, but it is still very good.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Now my theory is: not even half of the people who say they read it, did that or got past all the Soap opera, bad writing and endless and repetitive monologues.
I tried to talk about events towards the end and mid of the book. I did not find one of those fans who "could remember".
I guess it's like with a picture. It's great art. Some people said it so, others paid much money because of it, so it must be good.