The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
A Fire Upon the Deep
2016 Reads
>
AFutD: Usenet in SPAAAAACE!
date
newest »



Usenet is still around and searchable via groups.google.com, if anyone wants to revisit embarrassing shit they posted in college before they dropped out because they spent all day drinking and mudding and not going to class. Not speaking from experience.

Cool. I'm pretty sure he wrote this before I became a regular on Usenet, but I used to talk to him all the time.
I've been online since July 1985, so I've seen some wacky stuff.

Sean wrote: "I'm a bit too young to have been involved with Usenet, but I still kinda get the reference. That said, it doesn't quite work in audiobook format, at least not to me."
Those sections do date the book. It would be like writing the book now and using Twitter and Facebook millenia in the future as the cutting edge of social media communication.
It is hard to project 50 years forward in internet usage, but I would not use a system we have now. In tens of thousands of years, I would imagine some type of pure thought communication.
Not original, but unlikely to be outdated by technology in my lifetime.
Those sections do date the book. It would be like writing the book now and using Twitter and Facebook millenia in the future as the cutting edge of social media communication.
It is hard to project 50 years forward in internet usage, but I would not use a system we have now. In tens of thousands of years, I would imagine some type of pure thought communication.
Not original, but unlikely to be outdated by technology in my lifetime.


Reminds me of The Forever War – far in the future, sending a letter to Luna costs thousands of dollars because of taxes...

I agree. I overall enjoyed the audiobook, but I didn't understand why they thought the narrator should read these passages without emotion.
Also, I didn't realize Usenet had been a real thing, and because of this, it didn't make the book feel dated to me.

That tech exists, it just doesn't work where the story takes place:
Most of the High Ones didn't look very strange; civilizations at the Top were most often just colonies from below. But the headbands she saw here were not jewelry. Mind-computer links aren't efficient in the Middle Beyond, but most of the High Beyonders would not give them up.
You also have to consider the translation issues. The systems have a hard time handling plain text from sufficiently alien languages. Trying to render Skroderider mental patterns into something a human could understand would probably require Transcendent technology.
And on top of that, there's the bandwidth. I'm sure the planetary network on Relay or Sjandra Kei blows away whatever we have now, but when it comes to transgalactic FTL communications, there simply isn't enough to give everyone on a planet even a megabit connection.

This is the guy who foresaw things like Second Life and Facebook years before the founders of those services were even born, so it's not like he's being regressive due to lack of vision. His short story True Names anticipates the issues of web anonymity and combines it with NSA-style privacy concerns, the dark net, hacking, criminal scammers, bots, Homeland Security and VR... in freakin' 1980!
So it's not like he looked around and said, "Yeah, Usenet, Mario Cart and Windows 3.1, this is the pinnacle of technology."
I was on Usenet a bit in the late 90s and early 00s but by then it was mostly file sharing that drew me. I honestly didn't make the connection though. I mostly took it as some kind of galactic forum or bulletin board (severely lacking in door games).
Even knowing that know, it doesn't feel that dated to me. Usenet just evolved a bit differently than he predicted.
Even knowing that know, it doesn't feel that dated to me. Usenet just evolved a bit differently than he predicted.

Though I'm sure that, if it hadn't been for the whole fall of human civilization thing, they probably would've introduced emojis.

I don't think it dates it really, It's a very good fit around the considerable translation issues, communications delays, routing issues AND fits very well with the bandwidth limitations that apply.
I am really enjoying this book.


So does that mean the girl from Jurassic Park would be able to use the Net?
It's not only babies. At my mine processing job we have a touch screen input near our sample analyser.
The same input is available on a desktop in the control room, using keyboard and mouse.
I'd love a $1 for every time I've pushed the buttons on the PC monitor with my finger instead of using the mouse ;-)
It's embarrassing when someone sees you do it.
The same input is available on a desktop in the control room, using keyboard and mouse.
I'd love a $1 for every time I've pushed the buttons on the PC monitor with my finger instead of using the mouse ;-)
It's embarrassing when someone sees you do it.


I have often thought about writing a story using a similar format. Discussions in a network in our own solar system would likely resemble those older formats due to light speed delays.

It makes sense, given the high cost per byte of long range communications that a Usenet style protocol would come back into usage.
I thought it was an interesting contrast to the AIs and cyborgs that co-existed with this ancient technology.

It makes sense, given the high cost..."
Agreed. It's explained early in the book that galactic communication over long distances is cost prohibitive and often low bandwidth, so the Usenet model seems like a pretty good way to communicate across the galaxy.
It's also implied that the the source of some of the news feeds may not be someone typing, but the computers and relays translate it into the best transmission medium. There's at least one scene where the Ravna has a video feed to Kjet which degrades to audio, then text...
So, maybe someone in the High Beyond is mentally inputting their thoughts into a computer, but it gets translated to text for the Low Beyonders.
As and aside, I discovered Usenet back in 1989 or a little earlier, and had a passing knowledge of BBSs, so I was amused at the "Net of a Million Lies."
But I wonder how it stands up today for readers who have no clue what it is. Does it come off as just another Internet message system on a galactic scale, or does the primitive nature still shine through?
(For those who never experienced Usenet, or only know it as an odd file sharing network, it was an early type of Internet forum (it predated the World Wide Web by several years). On the user end, it worked pretty much like email, except for an address you'd use a group name like rec.arts.sf.written, or soc.history.what-if, or alt.sex.bestiality.hamsters.duct-tape (yes, that's real too -- Usenet was a weird place).
On the back end, though, it was a distributed system. Your message would go to your ISP's Usenet server, which would be peered with other servers. Every couple minutes, they'd ping each other to say, "Hey, you got any messages I haven't seen?" Your message would then slowly filter out to more and more Usenet servers around the world.
The great thing about Usenet was nobody controlled it -- once a message went out, it was virtually impossible to censor it, and since there was no central server anywhere, the only way to attack the system was to flood groups with spam. The bad thing about Usenet was nobody controlled it. If a racist troll set up shop in your favorite group, there was no way to get rid of him except to put him in your killfile.)