The Evolution of Science Fiction discussion

This topic is about
Kindred
Group Reads 2016
>
October 2016 Group read - Kindred
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jo
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Sep 30, 2016 09:00AM

reply
|
flag


Here is my review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...



https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I found it compelling and read it quickly, but if you're not hooked by the first chapter, then maybe it's not for you.

That's really frustrating. I bought my copy on kindle a little while ago and (having just checked) it's the same price now as I paid for it then. Perhaps it was on offer at the time you first looked it up? Have to admit though, I don't like paying almost the same price for a digital copy as for a physical one, but that's usually down to the publishers rather than Amazon.
On another note, I've only just started reading Kindred due to other commitments, so it's a bit early for me to comment. Looks promising so far, though.

I will read the reviews when I finish in case there are any spoilers.


I wi..."
I've read her story Bloodchild and have Dawn queued up on my Kindle. I thought Bloodchild very powerful.

I wi..."
I really love Octavia Butler. I've read the Lilith's brood trilogy starting with Dawn and I thought it was amazing. I thought it was even better than Kindred. I plan to read everything she wrote.

I read Parable of the Sower about a year ago. Not great, but not bad. Good enough that I've got its sequel, Parable of the Talents on my list of books to read.


I'd say it's more about slavery than time traveling, but it is partly about time travel.
The more I think about it, the more time travel is kind of a weird thing to get lumped into the Sci Fi genre. It fits on a technical standpoint, but the stories can be more about the setting and less about the time travel itself.
Another subgenre that gets lumped in: alternate history. I'm not even sure why that's Science Fiction, but that's where they put it in the bookstore.


I agree it's more about slavery but using time travel to give a better perspective to the story. In the appendix at the end of my book it mentions that Butler did not intend this book to be considered as sci-fi. Either way it's a well-written and fascinating book. She is particularly good with her characterisation so that there are multiple facets to all the characters rather than it being simply everybody being good or bad.

I also think we've picked an appropriate time to be reading Kindred, given author Lionel Shriver's comments on identity politics in fiction (and the response from other authors that has ensued):
https://www.theguardian.com/commentis...
Butler was a black American woman writing about black American history. It shaped her as a writer. But what if Butler had been white? Could she have written Kindred in the way she did? What does anyone else here think?

These are great questions and I wish I could discuss them. As usual we are racing to the end of the month and I haven't read either selection yet. But the books are on my shelf...

Of course culture, background, gender etc. can have influence on the subjects you're interested in and feel committed to. But pure technically I don't see how coulour influences writing style or quality. Remember we discussed here James Tiptree jr. - in her time nobody could tell by the writing that it was not James but Alice.

That's an excellent point, Leo, and it backs up the argument Shriver was making: fiction is, by definition, 'fake', so what is the point of fictional characters if they do not allow us to explore or experience the world through someone else's eyes, albeit from an entirely different culture, ethnicity, gender, etc.? The question arises from a sense of authenticity in this current age of 'identity politics and cultural appropriation' - this is what Shriver was hitting back at. In Tiptree's time, it was difficult for a female writer to break into a male-dominated sci-fi market, so her answer was to pose as a male author (thereby proving a point). In today's climate, however, (I'll use one of Shriver's examples), Chris Cleave writes as a 14yr old Nigerian girl refugee in Little Bee and is lambasted for it, not so much for the quality of the novel, but because he is not himself a)Nigerian b)female c) a refugee i.e. 'it is not his story to tell' (sic.).
Personally, I think that's rubbish. I think Shriver is right - authors should be positively encouraged to take on any character that enables we readers to encounter perceptions other than our own, even if they run contrarily. But then, I read Kindred.
Butler writes with such an 'authentic' voice, and I can't help feeling that, if she had been anything other than a black American woman, the complex relationship between Dana and Rufus wouldn't have been as multi-faceted as it is.
Hmmm.
I know it's not science fiction, but I think I'll have a read of Little Bee and put together some comparisons - see what comes up.

I wonder if you need to be a better author to write about a subject you know nothing about and bring it to life? I can see no reason why you can't write about anything, but it's making it believable that is more difficult.

Still, I'm curious for Little Bee!


Bloodchild was the first thing I read by Octavia Butler - it's beautifully written.

Amazon sez: This title is not currently available for purchase

Maybe it's a regional thing?

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Donna Rae wrote: "...what if Butler had been white? Could she have written Kindred in the way she did?"
It's a great question. I talked about it in my review. As far as "cultural appropriation" goes, I hope it is a passing fad. Instead of "cultural appropriation" (what's mine is mine, what's yours is yours), I'm a proponent of cultural cross-pollination: what's mine is also yours. We share human history, art, psychology, and culture. And many more things I haven't named.
"Cultural appropriation" becomes an issue for oppressed groups when they feel the majority of society have placed a false and racist identity on them. They want to take that identity back and replace it with one worthy of respect. I get it. Part of the process is clearing out the old stereotypes to create a more valid identity. During this time certain groups may say to the wider society: hands off, it's ours. As long as this phase is temporary, it's understandable.
I read the graphic novel adaptation Kindred: A Graphic Novel Adaptation by Damian Duffy. It don't feel like I lost anything by not reading the original novel.
Butler writes very well, and I want to read more of her novels, but the graphic version of this novel was good enough that I don't need to re-read it in the original form and I will focus on her other novels.
Butler writes very well, and I want to read more of her novels, but the graphic version of this novel was good enough that I don't need to re-read it in the original form and I will focus on her other novels.
Books mentioned in this topic
Kindred: A Graphic Novel Adaptation (other topics)Bloodchild (other topics)
Bloodchild (other topics)
Bloodchild (other topics)
Little Bee (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Chris Cleave (other topics)Lionel Shriver (other topics)
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)