Dune Fanatics discussion
Reading Chronologically -House Books Next
date
newest »





I liken the experience to watching a movie adaptation of say, the Bourne books. If I focus on the differences, it makes the experience unenjoyable. The books were superior to the movies, and they destroyed the lead female (Bourne's wife), but they were fun and convinced my nephews (in their teens) to pick up the books! Hopefully they will pick up Dune someday. :-)

I originally read Dune a very long time ago, then about twenty years later, I decided to read the entire series in chronological order, starting with the House series. As it turned out, I couldn't read the whole thing in exactly chronological order because before I finished the original series, Brian Herbert began releasing the Butlerian Jihad books.
So now let me open myself up to all manner of hatred, vitriol, and indignant flame-spraying: overall, I like the Herbert/Anderson books better than the originals. That's not true in every case, of course, but in general, that's how I feel. Dune is one of the greatest books ever written, but none of the other originals even came close to it.
I have not read all of the Herbert/Anderson books yet, but I have read most of them, and the ones I have read have all been thoroughly entertaining.
And that's the key - "entertaining". If, like me, you read scifi for entertainment, and if you have an open mind, then there is at least a very good chance you will enjoy the Herbert/Anderson books. On the other hand, if the original Dune series is your religion (which seems to be the case for many people) then you will probably not like the newer books.
I was wondering after reading Navigators of dune if anyone thought I should just skip the house books and move on to Dune. I AM HUGE INTO READING CHRONOLOGICALLY, but it may be a decade before they get back to finish up after navigators of dune. What do you guys think?