Reading the Chunksters discussion

This topic is about
Les Misérables
Side-Reads
>
05/26 Les Miserables, Part V, Books VI, VII, VIII, IX - THE END
date
newest »



Cosette is an interesting question. Certainly she is pathetic by modern standards, and I think even by Hugo's time, but he does seem to venerate her. The men in her life obviously adore her, but for her to blindly listen and not have her own opinions is appalling to me. I'm never quite sure what to make of her.
Valjean has a fairly fitting end for him, and fits with the story, but it is certainly depressing. It was horrible to watch Marius' treatment of him before he knew the truth. It's hard to blame him, knowing that he thought Valjean had murdered a police officer and stolen a great deal of money. At the same time, however, he had seen Valjean's great care of Cosette for a great deal of time... could he really not bring himself to ask more details, to see all sides of the story? This sudden, bitter hatred of the man was jarring and horrible, although I suppose rather human. I'm glad Valjean insisted on seeing Cosette, though.
I love that it was through Thernardier that Marius inadvertently learned the truth. How fitting for a lie to turn into revealing the truth!
While parts of this were drolling and tedious, I'm glad I read it again. It's a beautiful story with lots of life lessons and words of caution and encouragement for society. It's definitely a classic for a reason.

Oh yes, I remember laughing at that part too!!

I guess I assumed she was a typical woman of the time in terms of her blindly listening and not voicing her opinions (if she even has them, though). But I am by no means a historian, so I am assuming that this was the typical way women acted, basically to be second to their husband?
But yes, her lack of voice is quite appalling compared to today's standards.

Ha ha! Yes, I me too. :)

1. Did Thenardier play an important role in the novel? Is he only the 'evil poor' or is he more significant for Marius?
2. By modern standards, Cosette's attitude towards feminine intelligence is demeaning and belittling, but do you think her reaction was quite normal for that period when she only confessed that she was unable to comprehend the importance of the conversation between Marius and Jean Valjean, but was quite happy to hear their voices?
3. Why does Jean Valjean call Cosette Mme. Pontmercy and ask her to call him Jean after her marriage?
4. Why does Jean Valjean tell Marius only half of his story and skip some other noble parts of his past?
5. As well as people, characters are mortal in realistic fiction, but some have a habit of dying ahead of his or her time. Do you think Valjean dies too soon without seeing Cosette's grandchildren?
6. In the additional essay of my edition, its writer (unfortunately, I do not remember his name as I listened to the audio book) makes a point that the novel is an eclectic combination of great literature and populism. Do you agree with this interpretation?
7. Hugo, as well as Dickens, is known for his social stand for the dispossessed, the fallen, and the wretched. Is this novel a confirmation of the above postulated statement?
Great job, everyone, who has finished reading this novel.