Our Shared Shelf discussion
MAR/APR-Women Who Run... (2017)
>
Difficult to Read

Erika wrote: "Hi from Brazil!
Are you having difficulties to read this book? Because I have!
It's the second year I try to start but I get stuck... I'm forcing myself to keep going because friends of mine really..."
Hey, are you from the Brazil? I'm from the Brazil also. If you wants to write your doubts here to me in portuguese or not, i can help you.
Are you stuck on Women Who Run With Wolves, Erika?
I'm not having trouble with the read.. and i liked it. I can tell has alot of teachings there enough to tell that if you take 10% of the book is more than enough to change your own life.
Are you having difficulties to read this book? Because I have!
It's the second year I try to start but I get stuck... I'm forcing myself to keep going because friends of mine really..."
Hey, are you from the Brazil? I'm from the Brazil also. If you wants to write your doubts here to me in portuguese or not, i can help you.
Are you stuck on Women Who Run With Wolves, Erika?
I'm not having trouble with the read.. and i liked it. I can tell has alot of teachings there enough to tell that if you take 10% of the book is more than enough to change your own life.



Also, the author has a Ph.D. in Jungian psychology -- which by its very nature deals almost entirely in the abstract -- and if you, the reader, don't have any knowledge of Jungian psychology, that can make reading this book that much more difficult. You might try doing a quick Google search of Carl Jung and his psychological concepts just to brush up on some of the basics before diving back in.

I'm loving how I can see myself and where I am and what I need to do to find my wolf woman, but repeating it over & over takes away the beauty a little x



I was going to make the same suggestion. I think it would be helpful to have even a rudimentary understanding of Jung's theory of archetypes.



Amanda wrote: " It is a work that is going to be quite dense and full of thoughts, emotions, and spiritual revelations. These, of course, are abstract concepts as a rule. This makes them more difficult to describe, which might be where some of the trouble comes in.."
100% agree.
This is not a book that you are going to be able to read straight through despite it being about fairytales or storytelling. It's an analysis. The author is going to try to come at you with different ways of understanding her intended goal - hence the repetition.
But as Ross said, you will become more familiar with her style as you progress. Keep going!
100% agree.
This is not a book that you are going to be able to read straight through despite it being about fairytales or storytelling. It's an analysis. The author is going to try to come at you with different ways of understanding her intended goal - hence the repetition.
But as Ross said, you will become more familiar with her style as you progress. Keep going!

I'm going to take my time with this and read just a few pages a day, to ensure I absorb as much as I can from it.





Does it help to read up on tales and tale telling?
I am working through it. I think my ego might also be in the way a little bit but it's helpful to have a group like this to encourage each other..


Thank you! That sounds good. "Archetype" confused me there for a little bit:)






OMG, I find the introduction very hard to read. I've tried several times now and it just makes me fall asleep... :/ I do want to read it entirely before starting the book, but it's quite vague. It makes me wonder if I'm really going to like the book, but we'll see...

This really isn't an academic text. The absence of any justification or support in any of her commentary prevents this text from being academic in nature. She just uses lots of long words in long sentences.


True; maybe come back to it later, when you have a better idea of what the book is about? Especially if it's slowing you down.
I'm not sure if the book has been peer reviewed, so I guess strictly speaking, it would not be academic. However, it fulfills all of the other necessary requirements for scholarly writing. If you wanted to use this as a secondary source in an essay on Jungian pscychoanalysis, or literary analysis with a Jungian lens, you could.
I wouldn't say her arguments are unsubstatiated. However, much of her futher arguing toward a point is done in the notes in the back of the book, which is typical of Chicago style.
Deconstructing the stories will lead to a somewhat formulaic structure, and she does repeat some points that she feels are essential to her overall mission, which is revealing how to find the Wild Woman. However, this book could be thought of as being literary analysis trough a Jungian psychoanalysis lens, and such a formula is necessary to take each story point by point.
There are some long words, and there are certainly long sentences, but I hardly think this will be a barrier to someone who's made it past the first chapter of the book.

And her writing does not have the logical structure of academic writing. Rather than data, claim, substantion, and linking her style is based on convoluted and contradictory claims. Having a PhD does not make the author correct or this writing academic.






But I love how different our OSS reads are! the vagina monologues was such a different experience than that.

I'm a very "concrete" person though, if that makes sense, and have a hard time understanding or more relating to certain "vague" concepts, so that's what's bothering me the most here.
I'm still wondering if I'll be able to read through until the end, but the stories are definitely interesting! :)

I have read Jung and understand analytical psychology and archetypes and the rest ... this book still comes off as a lot of bullshit to me. Sorry.
Rather than collect archetypes and relate them in a meaningful way, the author picks and chooses from different stories to make a point. IMHO, this contributes less to any meaningful analysis than a Jungian exploration of the author's own psyche and experience. The fact that she often adds her OWN archetypes (the bowl, etc) hammers this home.
I came in hoping for a Campbell-style book that describes the female in actual myth, and came away completely disappointed. I'm interested to see what the rest of you make of it though - and hoping for some additional insight into what is considered an important feminist text!

As a newbie to this group I can't say if this is a benchmark for what's considered important in feminine texts. I do know that I looked at some of Emma's reading list for last year and the titles were varied enough that I have hope for next month.

That said, within those stories, I found an important thread and themes which resonated with me and which I'd not read elsewhere.
Therefore I found it to be valuable, though an arduous read - hope this might help :)


So in short: long and sometimes repetitive, but an interesting read nonetheless, so I'll try to hang in there and read this through to the end. It really is different from any other books I've read, but it does confirm to me that I really hate it when people talk about abstract concepts as I find them hard to grasp. I hope the book is worth the time it takes to read it entirely!


For those who are really struggling, you may find this useful.
http://www.soulcraft.co/essays/the_12...
I am no Jung expert, but it helps me as a reference point."
That's really interesting, thanks!
Are you having difficulties to read this book? Because I have!
It's the second year I try to start but I get stuck... I'm forcing myself to keep going because friends of mine really love it and I can see it's a great book with a beautiful empowering message. But I don't know if the problem is within me (like some sort of ego resistance in this subject) or the book. Probably the first option... but I think this book is a little repetitive...
I just finished the Blue Beard tale and so far it was the hardest part to get thru.
Are you having trouble?