Litwit Lounge discussion
Lounge: OPEN, please come in...
>
The quality of free books
date
newest »




That said, there are probably some good contributions out there that current publishers won't bother with because it's not trendy enough or some other reason. Perhaps there is a need for more drafts to be read and edited without a publisher??

The funny thing is, until I picked up all those free picture books, I had no bias at all against self publishing. I saw it as a really viable option. But to see every single one of those books fail very basic standards shocked me.
I feel that when authors self publish shoddy work, they make it so much harder for the good quality self published books to receive recognition. The bad apples are spoiling it for the good.



He's currently editing the first book and is hoping it will be ready for submission at the end of the year. It's a slow process because he's writing book six atm as well, and is in full time study. Plus book one was very rough, so he's basically had to rewrite it.



Storytelling is such an amazing gift. It brings such pleasure to the world.
But this leads me to wonder if the availability of self publishing is leading to lazy writing and lower standards.
I'm questioning this as both a reader and an author. My anthology of children's poems is free on Smashwords, and I only included in it poems that I felt were of a publishable standard. However I'm keeping it permafree because I don't have the health to market my book, and my aim was for it to be read, rather than earn me some money. And as it's a collection of my favourite poems, rather than a cohesively themed anthology, and lacks illustrations, I felt it was fairer to readers to keep it free.
But reading all these picture books has caused me to question the value of self publishing. If the author is the chief judge of the quality of a book, is there value in the book? And if readers become accustomed to a flood of poorly written material, will we lose the ability to distinguish good literature from trash?