The Evolution of Science Fiction discussion
General Science Fiction
>
Has anybody read?...
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jo
(new)
Apr 04, 2017 10:29AM

reply
|
flag


I've never read anything else by Robinson, but it looks as if he was publishing into the 1970s. Has anyone else read this or anything by him?



Still doesn't help Jo though.


Think this might work well for a thread as I asked about one book and now there are two books with the same name worth reading :-)

I found my copy of Robinson's Power, a 1969 translation. On the back is written that it was being filmed in 1968. Indeed I found the movie 'The Power' came out in 1968 and although it doesn't have a high rating overall, I read some very enthousiastic reviews by SF-fans on imdb.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvCz9...
I'm sure the book was better. Apparently I have the first edition by Lippincott Press. No jacket & it's been fairly well read. I set it out to read again after I finish my current book.


I'm also going to check out The Dark Beyond the Stars.

https://www.tor.com/2018/09/04/who-ar...
It's a neat idea & has some authors I'd like to explore more. What really caught my eye was Frank M. Robinson. I mentioned really liking one of his books The Power. I hadn't known that "...his political activities won him a spot in the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame...". (I didn't know there was a Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame, either.)

Leo wrote: "Cool..."
Yeah, that is a really cool list!
I also was interested by the first commentor:
"I nominate Jack L. Chalker. The SF Author who did much to make LGBT issues visible in the SFF community."
Loved the comment "If you’ve annoyed me recently, then by all means track down They'd Rather Be Right".
The Al Gore Rhythms of GoodReads had, for unknown reasons, suggested I might like Cordwainer Smith and R.A. Lafferty, so I was already investigating them. Lafferty is, um, interesting.
I recently accidentally discovered Clark Ashton Smith by browsing for a book by Cordwainer Smith, so it is interesting that CAS appears on a list named after CS. (I did not like the CAS that I read, but even the forward and afterword of that book Red World of Polaris say it isn't great.)
Stanley G. Weinbaum and Katherine Anne MacLean look interesting.
Yeah, that is a really cool list!
I also was interested by the first commentor:
"I nominate Jack L. Chalker. The SF Author who did much to make LGBT issues visible in the SFF community."
Loved the comment "If you’ve annoyed me recently, then by all means track down They'd Rather Be Right".
The Al Gore Rhythms of GoodReads had, for unknown reasons, suggested I might like Cordwainer Smith and R.A. Lafferty, so I was already investigating them. Lafferty is, um, interesting.
I recently accidentally discovered Clark Ashton Smith by browsing for a book by Cordwainer Smith, so it is interesting that CAS appears on a list named after CS. (I did not like the CAS that I read, but even the forward and afterword of that book Red World of Polaris say it isn't great.)
Stanley G. Weinbaum and Katherine Anne MacLean look interesting.

As for Jack L. Chalker, I've read only his The Four Lords of the Diamond [some assume his best], and yeas, there are sex changes [due to the nature of planets] but his heroes are definitely heterosexual [all books have romantic line]

There was another series Chalker wrote about Nathan Brazil, I think (Well World). I liked the first one, but the next book or two didn't do much for me so I dropped it. He's really into body morphing.

I've read the first two in Russian translation but I was unable to get the last two. So I thought hard to decide what were the special rules on the remaining planets and, I have to say, I was very close. I've read the whole series last year.


3 of my friends have read it & 2 gave it 4 stars while 1 gave it 3, so it does seem worthwhile.

It's been many (many!) years since I read it, but Dark Beyond the Stars really made an impact on me. Robinson delved into the societal adjustments that people would need to make on a generation ship. (His ideas regarding sexual relationships and population control were interesting to say the least.) I think this book was the first to show me that good SF is more about people than technology.

Pretty much a waste of time. Carl Sagan debunked all the ideas in that book in his Cosmos series.

I read The Player of Games. I thought it was good but it took a while to get going. I'm going to get back to that series hopefully soon. Trying to wrap up some other series first since the Culture books can all be read as stand-alones.

I did, and for me Culture books are interesting but not great kind of series - I enjoy reading them, but not rush to read all of them right now

This group read Player of Gamers some years back. In that month I read Consider Phlebas instead because that's the first book in the Culture series. I liked it a lot, there are lots of things happening in a grim atmosphere. I want to read the whole series but these are no books you rush through on a summer evening. I mean that as a compliment.

I've read all of the series bar The State of the Art and am a fan. It's a fascinating world politically; I'm not sure the idea of a galactic-level empire based on socialist anarchist principles has been seriously explored elsewhere, but Banks gives it a thoughtful treatment. Plus the ship names and personalities are wonderful.


Is it fiction if the author doesn't intend it as such? I suppose it's similar to reading the teachings of Scientology out of curiosity.

It might swing you in the wrong direction, but I enjoyed reading Banks' essay "A few notes on the culture" after I'd read one or two of the books. It might count as a decent introduction to some of the ideas in the series.
Link:
http://www.vavatch.co.uk/books/banks/...

"
http://www.vavatch.co.uk/books/banks/...
I liked this when I read it years ago. Not sure why it would put someone off. Banks was explicit (ims) that he wasn't writing Old American-style space opera, but rather a sort-of European Social Democrat version. But he's not in-your-face in the novels, and in fact almost all the action takes place outside the Culture worlds. Since Utopias make dull reading (per Banks).
I wonder if anyone has had a go at a GOOD utopian SF novel? Speaking as one who likes optimism in SF. And, indeed, most efforts at that sort of thing I've seen are deadly dull.... 😒 🤨

At least quite interesting is Soviet 60s Noon: 22nd Century, collection of short stories set in an utopian communist future

I can imagine that if you're mostly into hard sci fi, or of an opposing political/cultural bent to the Culture, you might dislike the tone of the essay. In that case you'll probably dislike the novels as well(!). I was supposing there might exist people who enjoy the novels but dislike the worldview advocated therein.
Peter wrote: "I wonder if anyone has had a go at a GOOD utopian SF novel?"
Tricky as they tend to either deal with interactions with non-utopian aspects/societies (thus not properly utopian) or be little more than a collection of ideas (thus not properly a novel).
Possibly Walden Two? I also intend to read Island at some point. These probably fall quite far into the "collection of ideas" category!
For Utopias, I agree with Octavia Butler: “I don't like most Utopia stories because I don't believe them for a moment. It seems inevitable that my Utopia would be someone else's hell.”

Here's the review to read, though the reviewer liked it far more than I did: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I don't recall if I finished it. I'm guessing not.
Books mentioned in this topic
Walden Two (other topics)Island (other topics)
Noon: 22nd Century (other topics)
Consider Phlebas (other topics)
The State of the Art (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Fredric Brown (other topics)Jack L. Chalker (other topics)
Jack L. Chalker (other topics)
Katherine MacLean (other topics)
Cordwainer Smith (other topics)
More...