Mock Printz 2026 discussion
Mock Printz 2018
>
May Selection: Strange The Dreamer
date
newest »



Looking over over the Printz criteria, I think Strange meets most of them. It has several themes and the characters are archetypes as opposed to stereotypes. The setting is unique and the story begins at the end and then develops linearly.
My only issue was that it was too loquacious but otherwise it was a solid read.



I can see the elements that would make it printz worthy. I think the book has an unique voice that does bring something different to the table. The characters and weep were great. The downfall for me was the length. Sometimes I felt there was a bit of fluff in there and my attention would wane. There is nothing wrong with a thick book, but I don't think I need to be on a roller coaster of attention to keep focused on it. I ended up ditching it half way through.
I am on disc six of Strange the Dreamer. It's an interesting read so far and I'll probably finish it. I took a pause to listen to The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas. I'm loving that book right now. I'll probably finish up Strange the Dreamer after. I finished Caraval but, it wasn't my jam. I found Scarlet a little annoying and the pacing of story a bit off putting.



A few spoilers ahead:
I've really enjoyed Taylor's fantasy fiction before but this one so did not do it for me. I alternated between irritability and boredom reading it, basically a mood of "Yeah yeah yeah I get it, so when is something going to happen?" The downtrodden orphan/librarian bit went on for way too long, and the contrast between humble Lazlo and the egotistical golden boy Thyon was boringly heavy-handed. When the adventure finally begins, Taylor immediately skips over the first promising development, depriving us of the hero's transformation, and basically says, "six months later he was no longer a weenie and had developed pecs and an attitude in the desert." Then we get into the lost city of Weep, and though I'll agree that Taylor's imagination is creative, and the citadel was fairly thoroughly imagined, I feel like her world-building doesn't go very deep. Generally I found her descriptions, and the characters' angst, more long-winded and overwrought than lush. I am generally someone who suspends disbelief and just immerses, and I don't try to "solve" the story, but here I guessed The Thing very early on. I thought the most compelling part was the dream world wherein the protagonists meet. But then there's that "to be continued" ending with the story almost arbitrarily hacked off, threads waving in the wind.
Interesting characters; novel ideas; erratic pacing; thin world building; repetitive description. To my mind this one does not meet the Printz criterion of literary excellence.

This wouldn't be my choice for a Printz Award, but I don't know if that is fair because it was so not to my personal taste.





Took a little while to get hooked by the narrative (the plot is not the strongest part of the story - yet). Instead, Taylor introduced and amplified each character in a tightly organized way, so that by the end of the book the reader was right where she wanted us, emotionally attached to the protagonist and riveted by the revelation of his identity.
The dream world of Laszlo and Sarai was a tender (and highly effective) counterpoint to the harsh history of Weep (brought The Night Circus to mind) and made the conclusion of the book even more affecting.
I agree with most of the other commenters that this will probably not appeal to the Printz committee, as a fantasy and as part of a duology. Unfortunate....
Did you like Strange the Dreamer? Do you think it is Printz worthy? Why or why not.