Mock Newbery 2026 discussion

This topic is about
Angie Thomas
Newbery 2018
>
The Hate U Give
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Shari (Shira)
(new)
May 14, 2017 11:28AM

reply
|
flag

Not only is it eligible, The Hate You Give has a great shot at winning.



They gave 5 stars for positive messages and positive role models,. I'm trying to get my hands on a copy to read.

Considering the young adult graphic novel This One Summer by Mariko Tamaki won a Caldecott Honor back in 2015, I think maturity level continues to be downplayed by the children's literature committees. I am not sure if it is a trend or the new norm.



It can be agreed that recommended ages are utterly subjective when it comes to individual choices. It should also be argued that, not one word of Angie Thomas's book should be altered. It is perfection. It is also a truth that when it comes to profanity, taboo words are merely an agreed upon norm among society.
However, when we are talking about an award for books that goes from zero to fourteen years and three hundred and sixty-four days, is it okay to exclude the majority of the age range? (I suppose 100% of zero-year-olds have been excluded in the past ninety some years.) When selecting books for my K-6 school library, I strive to be expansive in choices that bump up against recommend ages, but with THE HATE U GIVE the reach is too far away for it to be considered for my school. While I understand I can't speak for all my students, more than a mere majority would be highly uncomfortable, not with the substance of the story, but with the level of profanity and the frank intimate sexual discussions Starr has about and with her boyfriend.
I will continue to argue to my death that scrotum has never, and will never be a filthy word. The vocabulary used in THUG is acknowledged to be "mature content." If it were to get the medal, the Newbery would forever be viewed with suspicion by many parents and librarians throughout much of the country. I worry it it will feel usurped from their expectations so soundly they will never give it credibility again. Frankly, if THUG is considered outside the age restraint, there is no reason for it not to win. As I stated before, it is perfection.
I realize I'm speaking from a white-red-state sensibility. Starr's parents had to have "the talk" with her about the police while she was the age of my students. There is a large number of children in our country for which this is their reality. For them to see their lives reflected honestly in such a compelling and fully-rounded story is powerful. Having it win the Newbery would legitimize a segment of our country that has been stereo-typed and mostly absent in much of children's literature. My hope is, and my belief is, more and more books with these voices will emerge.
I do feel that THUG is above the accepted age range, but that there will naturally be many, many younger readers for which it will be a perfect fit.



Considering the young adult graphic novel This One Summer by Mariko Tamaki won a Caldecott..."
The age range for both the Newbery and the Caldecott is ages 0-14. This One Summer is YA, but appropriate for the younger end of YA and with a protagonist who fits in this age range. I don't think what you're seeing is a blurring of the guidelines, but an appreciation of the full range of the guidelines.

I'm glad to hear such good response to the book though, I can't wait to read it!
