ManBookering discussion
2017 Longlist [MBP]
>
Solar Bones by Mike McCormack
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Maxwell
(new)
Jul 27, 2017 03:00PM

reply
|
flag

The book is stylistically unusual in that the whole book is a single incomplete sentence, with no full stops or quotation marks but some commas and line breaks. Given those constraints it is a surprisingly easy read. Although the book could be read as a mid-life crisis novel, its range of subject matter makes it a lot more interesting than that might suggest.

I found the opening and closing few pages the best. They are very poetic, very atmospheric. The section in the middle keeps the single sentence idea going, but only really in name. If you put full stops where you read "and" or other "joining words", then it isn't all that different to normal prose. But, that said, the single sentence brings a different rhythm to it, I think: it adds to the dream-like nature that is appropriate for the spoiler.
I know I enjoyed reading it. But, if truth be told, I don't have a hankering to go back and re-read it.




Neil re your comment on re reading, I have re read it for the Booker and found it a very enjoyable read second time around. In terms of the style, I agree the joining words could be replaced by full stops but I think the effect is to mimic the narrator's thoughts as they flip between topics and events, the joining words showing how his mind moves continuously from one thought to another. Reading interviews with the author, it's also related to the spoiler.



Solar Bones
LAZ: Solar Bones is a book I sort of fell in love with instantly because its style is incredibly beautiful. It’s almost one run-on sentence. It’s Joycean, which is very hard to pull off. I think all of us who are writers have read Joyce, of course, and, in a way, dream to emulate him, and very few can. And somehow, in his own completely original way, he’s channeled the Joycean in something lyrical and poetic that actually truly works and becomes a work in its own right.
I really enjoyed this one! Definitely in my top 6 right now. I was also spoiled for this one (I think I read it in an early press release or something after the longlist was announced), but I don't think it really spoiled the reading experience for me. In fact I think knowing the spoiler helped me view the book through a different lens which I really enjoyed.


Neil re your comment on re reading, I have re read it for the Booker and found it a very enj..."
I just finished it, and I really thought it was outstanding. In my mind, the single sentence is not a gimmick in any way, shape, or form, but rather it fits the theme of the book perfectly. I felt as though the book was, in many ways, about the relentlessness of real life. I loved how it focused on the small things - - the hassles at work, the daily relationships with ones adult children, and then the big things that come and wallop you while you still have to contend with all the small ones. The run on sentence exemplified that same feeling . . .as though there's no natural place to stop reading, and you (the reader) don't control the ebb and flow of the book, in the same way our control of life's curve balls and flow are necessarily limited. I am rambling, but honestly, the more I think about it, the more I really think this book is especially well done.


Neil re your comment on re reading, I have re read it fo..."
Oh my gosh, that is the nicest comment I think anyone has ever said about anything I've written on Goodreads, Neale. Thank you. I really hope you feel it in the same way I did if you try it again.

I haven't read all the books sadly, but of the nine I have read, I'm rooting for this one!