Espionage Aficionados discussion
Random Chats
>
What makes a good book blurb?
date
newest »

My vote is in. #2.
I suppose --in general--I tend to go with the blurb that has these qualities: erudition, temperance, restraint, quietness, and an even-toned, 'distinct voice'. I dislike 'canned' or 'loud' sounding book promo.
Whether one agrees or not about the big publishing houses; they wielded a dab hand at this. Look at the blurbs for books by Forsythe, Follett, and LeCarre. You never feel hit-over-the-head. They're always mellow and buttery-sounding. Use of rich--but still accessible vocabulary.
A word like 'magisterial' is an example of what I mean. You might see a phrase like, "This penultimate work in LeCarre's magisterial espionage saga..." . This type of sentence says to me "professional editing staff".
I suppose --in general--I tend to go with the blurb that has these qualities: erudition, temperance, restraint, quietness, and an even-toned, 'distinct voice'. I dislike 'canned' or 'loud' sounding book promo.
Whether one agrees or not about the big publishing houses; they wielded a dab hand at this. Look at the blurbs for books by Forsythe, Follett, and LeCarre. You never feel hit-over-the-head. They're always mellow and buttery-sounding. Use of rich--but still accessible vocabulary.
A word like 'magisterial' is an example of what I mean. You might see a phrase like, "This penultimate work in LeCarre's magisterial espionage saga..." . This type of sentence says to me "professional editing staff".
Goodreads poll