The Book Vipers discussion

This topic is about
Down and Out in Paris and London
Group Read Archive
>
Group Classics Read (post 1900) - August 2014 - Down and Out in Paris and London - SPOILERS ALLOWED
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Paul
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 06, 2014 01:41AM

reply
|
flag

This book is somewhere between Henry Miller and Charles Bukowski.
Only issue I have so far is the length of the book, one of the reasons nobody wanted to publish it is because it was so short. I wish Orwell had spent longer on some of the characters.

He has some interesting ideas at the end on dealing with tramps, seems sensible but these ideas never get picked up.

He has some interesting ideas at the end on dealing with tramps, seems sensible but these ..."
It was really good wasn't it.


Finished late last night. Review here.
It makes for uncomfortable reading as he mixes with those at the very lowest of society. It is not a pleasant book to read, but I am glad that I have read it as Orwell is a fine writer indeed.
It makes for uncomfortable reading as he mixes with those at the very lowest of society. It is not a pleasant book to read, but I am glad that I have read it as Orwell is a fine writer indeed.

The "plot" is a bit spotty and I feel like we never get to know the main character, but maybe that was a choice on Orwell's part.
And I don't mind the book being short as my reading time is limited!

There is no real plot to Down and out in Paris and London because they are memoirs of a sort. The authors' own experiences on the tramp in London and of his stay in Paris.
I hope the book gets better for you Betty, it's one of my favourites and we always want other people to like our favourites!!
I hope the book gets better for you Betty, it's one of my favourites and we always want other people to like our favourites!!
My mum's partner was an architect. He was working in the 50's and 60's and told me of a dosshouse they were transforming. There was a room with a rope stretched across fromm wall to wall and this is where the tramps when they stayed the night, would sleep. They'd hang on the rope (with the rope line under their armpits to keep them propped up), and sleep standing up like that at night. It was cheaper for them to sleep like that than lie on the floor. the extra space required for lying down meant that was a more expensive option.