The Sword and Laser discussion

Doomsday Book (Oxford Time Travel, #1)
This topic is about Doomsday Book
125 views
2017 Reads > DB: Question on Kivrin behavior (spoilers up to chapter 10)

Comments Showing 1-20 of 20 (20 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Paulo (last edited Oct 30, 2017 06:10PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paulo Limp (paulolimp) | 164 comments Ok, I am a bit confused about Kivrin's actions at this point. I'm reaching chapter 11 now, so only click to help if you've reached that point.
Specifically:
(view spoiler)
Isn't there a paradoxal behavior? I am presuming that (view spoiler)
Can anyone help me understand that?

BTW - loving the book so far


Robert Lee (harlock415) | 318 comments Fevered delirium I think.


Melani | 189 comments She's really sick at that point, so you can't really expect logical thinking.


Fredrik (fredurix) | 228 comments Melani wrote: "She's really sick at that point, so you can't really expect logical thinking."
Yes, I think the delirium and sense of illness came across very well.

I think they oversold the danger of being burnt at the stake for witchcraft, but that's another issue altogether (The witch processes was a 16-17the century phenomenon, and as far as I know burning in this time was generally the ultimate punishment for unrepentant heresy, while witchcraft was if not accepted, then at least more tolerated than in later centuries)


message 5: by Sean (new) - rated it 1 star

Sean O'Hara (seanohara) | 2365 comments And the English never punished witchcraft with burning at the stake. That was a continental thing. Willis isn't a great historical researcher.


Melani | 189 comments Sean wrote: "And the English never punished witchcraft with burning at the stake. That was a continental thing. Willis isn't a great historical researcher."

Is it Willis who isn't a great historical researcher or Kivrin? Remember, the fear of being burned at the stake is ALL Kivrin's.


Fredrik (fredurix) | 228 comments Yea, I wouldn't be so quick to lay this on the author. The whole rushed affair is rife of incomplete information, and the only person to worry (excessively) about the real danger involved is Dunworthy, who isn't even an expert on the time period. The stake burning is probably one of his fears, if it isn't stated directly.


AndrewP (andrewca) | 2667 comments I seem to remember a scene where a guy dug a grave in frozen ground with a wooden spade. There were numerous small things that made me think Willis had done minimal research.


Melani | 189 comments That's possible. It's been about a year since I've read this one (and I have no plans to revisit it, it is not a comfortable book to read) so I don't really remember the little details. However, in general Willis is known for being a bit of an overresearcher if anything.


message 10: by Sean (last edited Nov 01, 2017 03:45PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sean O'Hara (seanohara) | 2365 comments Melani wrote: "Is it Willis who isn't a great historical researcher or Kivrin? Remember, the fear of being burned at the stake is ALL Kivrin's."

It's Willis. Back when Blackout/All Clear came out, there were a ton of reviews from Brits pointing out factual errors, such as using anachronistic names for Tube stations, and even mentioning stations that weren't built until thirty years after the story takes place.. At one point a character finds the station he needs is out of service and walks miles to the next station even though his destination was only a fraction of the distance away.


message 11: by Robert (last edited Nov 02, 2017 07:56AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Robert Lee (harlock415) | 318 comments Sean wrote: "Melani wrote: "Is it Willis who isn't a great historical researcher or Kivrin? Remember, the fear of being burned at the stake is ALL Kivrin's."

It's Willis. Back when Blackout/All Clear came out,..."


Well, clearly The Oxford Time Travel books have altered history somehow. :-D No cell phones. But maybe it turns out they have been altering history all along and don't know it. They could be wrong about the net not allowing paradox.


message 12: by Sean (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sean | 367 comments I'm tempted to put the blame for that particular bit on Dunworthy, since I believe he's the one who first mentions it. But yeah, Kivrin should have pointed out that people were never burned at the stake for witchcraft in England - they were hanged. At the very least, she should know this. That I will blame on Willis.


Bruce (bruce1984) | 41 comments So I'm kind of confused also. Is the translator somehow embedded in Kivrin's head? Did they surgically altar her brain? Does it automatically infuse language directly into her audio cortex somehow? Or is there an external device I missed?


Michele | 1154 comments @ Bruce - it's like a tiny translator computer implanted near her ear, I believe. Like a Babelfish, but tech. It can send the sounds directly to her eardrums from inside her head. It's only meant to be a back-up, since she has already "studied" the language. It's just that what she learned was mostly wrong about accent and inflection and so on. Once she gets the hang of it, she doesn't need it's help except with a few unknown words.

She also has the recorder ('corder) implanted in her palm.

Well, it's very hand-wavy, but this isn't trying to be hard scifi or anything.


Bruce (bruce1984) | 41 comments Michele wrote: "@ Bruce - it's like a tiny translator computer implanted near her ear, I believe. Like a Babelfish, but tech. It can send the sounds directly to her eardrums from inside her head. It's only meant t..."

Okay, thanks, now I get it. That's why she was pretending to pray when she was recording. I must have missed the explanation somewhere...


message 16: by Sean (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sean | 367 comments They actually say it's a chemical thing, not something mechanical. For a while, Kivrin thinks it must be broken, but then remembers that it can't be broken, because there's nothing to break.


Bruce (bruce1984) | 41 comments Sean wrote: "They actually say it's a chemical thing, not something mechanical. For a while, Kivrin thinks it must be broken, but then remembers that it can't be broken, because there's nothing to break."

That would make sense for implanting in a human ear, a chemical machine.


message 18: by Sean (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sean | 367 comments I actually took the time to look this up. From chapter 10 (page 139 in the 1994 edition):

"It [the interpreter] can't be broken, she told herself. It's not a machine. It's a chemical syntax and memory enhancer. It can't be broken."


message 19: by Steve (new)

Steve (plinth) | 179 comments My take was that Dunworthy suffered from anxiety (which is apparent) and the way that he coped with that was to make sure that every single base was covered (view spoiler) so one of his ways of coping with this with Kivrin was to dump every single possible anxiety of his onto her. She clearly took some of this to heart which is why (view spoiler), for example.


message 20: by Sean (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sean | 367 comments Yeah, Dunworthy's constant fretting over every little thing was pretty damn annoying. It's kind of why I couldn't really take his side, despite all the crap Gilchrist was pulling. The only person in the early chapters I really felt any sympathy for was Kivrin.

As to Kivrin taking so much of it to heart, I put that down to (view spoiler)


back to top