Language & Grammar discussion
Grammar Central
>
Of Phonograms, Idiograms, and Logograms
date
newest »

Yes, very interesting. Reminds me of the confusion I always have about the difference between signs and symbols.

Like "percent," which is shortened from "percentage."
And then there are acronyms that are now part of our everyday language, like the more recently coined "glitch" ("Gremlin Loose In Terminal: Call for Help")and "snafu" ("Situation Normal: All Fouled [another "F" word originally used here] Up").


One of my colleagues is a recent immigrant from Albania, and he is most curious about the way we use the English language. Always asking me what I meant when I use a certain word he has not yet heard. His English is far better than my Albanian, of which he has only taught me one word (for "puppy" which we call my Albanian boss to tease him).
Phonograms, are the letters or combinations of letters that make sounds. They're the basis of most Western written langauges. Think "Hooked on Phonics" Written English (and most western languages) are based on phonograms.
Logograms are the symbols meant to convey a concept rather than a sound. e.g. The Deshret or Red Crown symbolized ruling lower Egypt to the early Egyptians. Written Chinese and Japanese and most Eastern languages are based on Logograms.
Idiograms are are something like Logograms but for more basic concepts e.g. A red circle with a line through it for NO!
Champillion was actually pretty lucky in his work on the Rosetta Stone in that he had several versions of the same text. His determining that ancient hieroglyphs were actually mostly phonograms was actually based on being able to "sound out" some of the royal names in their cartouches based on the greek versions of the names on the same stone.