Tournament of Books discussion

This topic is about
The Animators
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
2018 TOB Shortlist Books
>
The Animators
message 1:
by
Amy
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jan 03, 2018 01:27PM

reply
|
flag

This book is probably the most "written for me" of the shortlist - I'm such a sucker for quirky-yet-fully-realized characters and strong female friendships.
I doubt The Animators will win, but I can't wait to see the writeups and comments it gets!

I think this book does have the ability to go far in the tournament if the judge(s) falls for the real love story in this book which is the friendship between Mel and Sharon.
What most impressed me personally about this book was its depiction of the films. Often I have trouble with visual art in as represented in novels since I can't actually "see" it. But I so want to see Nashville Combat if it really existed and I think Whitaker did a great job bringing the animated art to life in the text.


Totally agree that the book is in large part about where that line is in mining one's personal life for one's art which is fascinating. This is also touched on with Mel and her depiction of her mother in the first film.

I liked the dilemma of using intimate aspects of someone's life (Teddy) to make a story, in this case a film. It is a good representation that fiction does not come out of nowhere. Much fiction is based on people's lives. And that's what Mel and Sharon did.
I read a biography some years back of Somerset Maugham the novelist. He went on a long journey to Asia in the early 1900's and met with many British colonials. He listened to the stories they told - and then made novels and many short stories out of these tales. When he returned back some years later his reception among these same colonials was somewhat different (frigid). They had now read Maugham's stories and how he had processed their conversations as a novelist.
I don't feel that the dilemma of using Ted as a character in their second feature, Irrefutable Love, was resolved. And maybe it cannot be.
So this was a strong theme in "The Animators" which is what made it good story.
But I did get tired of the endless smoking of cigarettes and weed. I almost felt I was getting an advertisement for cigarette companies!




I felt the same way.
I've also just finished Conversations with Friends, which was on the longlist (and really enjoyed it). I thought it was strikingly similar to the Animators in lots of ways, particularly the central friendship. It also had lots of characters who smoked.


I just wrote a review so rather than rewrite, I'll just leave my link here....https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...




I finished it today & found it terrific. (I was dragging my feet about reading, so I could linger, and I'm normally not much of a lingerer. But I will say that the final section, Sharon after [final Big Event, are we spoiling things here in these threads?], didn't grip me as tightly as what came before. Mainly because I figured she'd get where she got in the end, and there wasn't nearly as much tension around that as there was about how Mel's meltdowns during the press tour would affect them, or Sharon's recovery journey, or all the Teddy stuff and Mom/Sharla stuff would go.
I loved the use of color in this. I did a search for 'purple' at the end and screen shot all the instances, because they all just hit me as so... full and lush and overflowing and electric and intent.
And I really was immersed in the physical reality of Sharon - my lungs feel poisoned by all the smoking she did. My hands were cramped. I woke up surprised I hadn't lost a ton of weight from the hospital stay. That close an inhabitation by a character is, while not at all comfortable, rare and impressive.



I am having such a hard time forcing myself through this book. If not for all the positive comments in this thread, I would DNF it. Maybe its greatness will reveal itself on the next page, or the next chapter...


There was a point in which it picked up momentum for me and I started wondering what was happening next, but it took a while to get there.



As an artist I identified with Sharon, especially with her insecurity. She thinks Mel is a better artist. There is always someone you think is better than you. So seeing Mel through Sharon's point of view gave me an idealized, incomplete view of this character. I understand why you thought the novel lacking in this regard. To me that was a weakness of this book.

Heh. Book inspires reality.

Heh. Boo..."
Pffft! Did you find anything interesting? I did that once and found out my first love had died....it felt weird.

I looked at two - one who invited me to his 6 year old birthday party where I was the only girl (we rode the bus together), and one who used to spend recess kissing my knees after I went down the slide. Both appear to be married, fairly recently, and to have mini versions of themselves. Awwwww. Both still live in the town/county where we grew up, while I have moved across the country.

Jenny and Janet, I had no such compulsion. You two crack me up.

And if anyone out there still watches Big Brother (guilty), every time I think EXTREME I think:



Me too. I'm hoping if it gets defeated it will come back as a zombie...




I was mixed about how things were left so unfinished with Teddy - was hoping for more resolution, but also happy it didn't tie things up in a pretty predictable bow. I liked how the characters weren't blameless. How you could see both sides when people were arguing. Even Sharon's mom in the end.
Excellent as an audiobook also!
I'm 80 pages in and getting a little bored with Mel's bad behavior. Some funny swearing, though. I think I'm going to use "suckle my balls". The "-le" suffix gives it extra dimension.



That's what makes it literary fiction!

I wasn't hooked early on either, but I'm glad I listened to readers who pushed me to keep going. If Mel is your sticking factor, the further you go the less Mel and the more Sharon you get. It's one of those books that I'm liking a whole lot more as I think back on it.
My IRL book group talked about it last night, and I noticed that people in their 40's especially adored it.... I guess it hits their nostalgia era....
This book illustrates the problem with the rule of giving a book 50 pages before you decide whether you're going to finish it. With this one, it takes over 100 pages to find out what the book is about -- that being the exploration of Sharon's childhood horror story.
I'm on page 150. And I'm caught up in it. But if I had stopped after 50 pages, I never would have known how invested I would become.
I'm on page 150. And I'm caught up in it. But if I had stopped after 50 pages, I never would have known how invested I would become.
"You puttin' on your eatin' dress, Mamaw?"
LOL
Kayla Rae Whitaker is a hoot. I hope she comes to a Booktopia someday.
LOL
Kayla Rae Whitaker is a hoot. I hope she comes to a Booktopia someday.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.