The Song of Achilles Readalong discussion

This topic is about
The Song of Achilles
Spoiler-free Discussion
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jessica
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Apr 17, 2018 11:25AM

reply
|
flag
Hi everyone! It's May 1! I've decided to also participate in the One Readathon to Rule Them All as well, but will be getting started on this tonight as well. Hope you're all well and ready to dive in!



ha - that's amazing :)



I am about 120 pages in and it feels to me there are some flashes of beautiful writing stitched together with prose which feels rather more prosaic. Having heard so much about the book and seen the rating here on GR I was expecting to be blown away by the writing, but that hasn't happened so far.
Much to admire in the themes though I think and I have just arrived at a point where it feels the plot is about to be propelled forward at pace after a rather more sanguine opening few chapters.

I would agree that The writing is not amazing, but I quite like the more simple (not sure this is the right word) style, there is not lots of description and I don’t feel like she is trying too hard to be ‘literary’ or ‘poetic’ which is good.

I had some mild familiarity with the Greek mythology but not in depth. I am wondering what everyone thinks about whether knowledge of Greek mythology and the Iliad enhances your enjoyment and understanding of the novel or if you can just enjoy the novel in its own right?
Patroclus has a less major role in the Iliad.. do you think building up his relationship with Achilles affects the storyline?

Hi everyone! I'm loving the comments so far but need to make a confession! (more on the next YouTube video...) I haven't been reading! Not this, not ANYTHING. My sleep schedule has been so messed up this past week so I'm just trying to get back on track. But I do remember how readable the writing style was and it was a style I really enjoyed, so I'm hoping to get started on this tonight and at least make a tiny dent. I've read and enjoyed The Iliad before, so I was familiar with the story, but never studied it formally or anything, but I agree with Susannah that my enjoyment I think is greater because I already had some background in it. Happy reading!

I did a buddy read with Shaun on this, and one of many things we noticed was the amount of foot/feet mentions Miller included. 😂
I will be posting the rest of my thoughts in the spoiler section. I read a blurb if the Gregory Maguire interview and Miller mentioned that she threw away her first draft of the novel after 5 yrs and completely started all over again! Crazy! We know it ended up taking her another 5 years to write the novel.
Jess - hope your schedule improves and thanks for the inspiration to read the novel!




Oh, I'm glad you got the chance to read it :)
I finally started the book again guys! I'm not very far in yet, but it's feeling very comfortable to me and just like the first time I read it, it's grabbed me right away. I'll continue to post thoughts as I have them!
I'm switching back to this thread as I'm reading and I wanted to add a thought about whether this book is YA or not, and since I went into this re-read with that question sort of in mind, I found it interesting to come across this quote early on in the book:
"Some people might have mistaken this for simplicity. But is it not a sort of genius to cut always to the heart?" (page 44 in my edition)
I thought this summed up my feelings about the issue entirely. The writing is definitely simple, and it could easily be read by a younger audience, but I feel pretty strongly that there is a tension and a subtly to the writing that would be lost on a YA audience. And I don't mean that as a criticism of teen readers AT ALL. I just think there is a maturity to the writing and the story and that while the book could easily be read by younger readers, the real punch of the story would be lost.
As a secondary note, I always find that this style of writing echoes the simplicity of oral storytelling which is what all of this is based on. It somehow makes it feel more authentic to my brain.
"Some people might have mistaken this for simplicity. But is it not a sort of genius to cut always to the heart?" (page 44 in my edition)
I thought this summed up my feelings about the issue entirely. The writing is definitely simple, and it could easily be read by a younger audience, but I feel pretty strongly that there is a tension and a subtly to the writing that would be lost on a YA audience. And I don't mean that as a criticism of teen readers AT ALL. I just think there is a maturity to the writing and the story and that while the book could easily be read by younger readers, the real punch of the story would be lost.
As a secondary note, I always find that this style of writing echoes the simplicity of oral storytelling which is what all of this is based on. It somehow makes it feel more authentic to my brain.