Bailey's/Orange Women's Fiction Group discussion

This topic is about
The Signature of All Things
2014 Books
>
August 2014 Book The Signature of All Things
date
newest »



i do hope those reading it this month will love it as much as i did - i just found it a wonderful and surprising read. (surprising because while i was interested in the subject...i didn't have any expectations, good or bad. the only gilbert i had read previously was Stern Men (which i actually went back and reread after i finished TSoAT). i did not jump on the Eat, Pray, Love bandwagon...though i did feel that gilbert was fairly harshly judged for that work.) anyway...all of that, and the fact it was one of my favourite reads of 2013 did catch me by surprise, which was nice. i have since passed along the book to my mum and stepdad, and they both loved it too. (phew!!)
if you have not watched this, gilber gave a tremendous TED talk on creativity - http://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_gi...

Personally, I liked Eat, Pray, Love. I listened to it while driving and would be annoyed that I was arriving where I had to be so soon because I wanted to hear more.


at the beginning of 'the signature of all things', gilbert writes:
“What life is, we know not. What life does, we know well.”that line is a bit of a riddle in itself, and gilbert commented on her thoughts about it (which i will hide, but it's not really spolier-y as far as plot details, but just in case...) (view spoiler) .
i am wondering what you felt or thought when you read this quote?



it is a wonderful pair of sentences!
i feel it also sets up the story to be a big one - it definitely got my curiosity going in a 'hmm...well what do we have here?' sort of way! :)

Here is a link to a page about Omai at the Captain Cook birthplace museum. It doesn't say what happened to him after his return to the South Sea Islands, but his Wikipedia page says he died a couple of years later.
http://www.captcook-ne.co.uk/ccne/the...
And here is a page about a Sir Joshua Reynolds exhibition at the Tate Gallery in London, which includes his famous portrait of Omai:
http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-...

This is what the epigram made me think about:
Botanists in the C18th were perhaps more certain that they knew everything about 'what life did' than modern ones. They were discovering new plants from around the world and had a classification system to put them in. The propagation techniques developed then are still in use. There have been more investigations into the details of life processes since and this seems to have led to less certainty that we know all there is to know.
'What life is' had perhaps just started to become a scientific question as much as a philosophical or religious one around that time. I'm not at all sure that we are any closer to an answer now.

Also... I'm not sure whether to mark this as a spoiler but will do just in case.
(view spoiler)





gilbert touched on the issue of sex, in an interview with the chicago tribune:
Q: From the first page of "The Signature of All Things," I was struck by the sense of not just reading historical fiction, but of having it narrated by something of a historical voice — the voice of a novelist of the 19th century — and yet it's not quite that at certain points of the story, if you know what I mean.
A: (Laughs.) I know exactly what you mean.
Q: It's like Charles Dickens with sex.
A: (Laughs.) Oh yeah.
Q: So how did you come up with that voice, and how did you calibrate it?
A: Well, you definitely started off on the right track with Dickens. He's my role model in all things writing, but particularly in this book. The thing I love about Dickens, and was trying to emulate, is the omniscient, omnipotent narrator, and the great confidence of the narrator, which marks 19th-century novelists in general and Dickens in particular. Dickens often has these very exuberant narrators, who convey the sense that "Not only do I know what I'm doing, and we're going to go on an adventure — it's going to be a terrific adventure." That's something he did magnificently, and I tried to emulate that.
At the same time, I didn't want to pretend that this book was written in the 19th century. Dickens never could write about sex. (Jane) Austen could never write about sex. (George) Eliot could never write about sex, except in the most oblique way. And I wanted to be able to explore these characters and their intimacy in a way that I wouldn't have been able to do if I were purporting to write an actual period novel. And I did struggle with how to do that, until I read "Wolf Hall." It felt like a lightbulb went on, because Hilary Mantel does such a magnificent job of writing in a way that feels accurate to the period without feeling like she's pretending to write a book that's 400 years old. It's a very modern voice that she uses to write about a very distant time, and that's what my aspiration was.
link: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/20... (potential spoilers on page 2 of interview.)
*****
i am a huge beatrix potter fan, and while reading gilbert's novel was continually reminded of her. it did turn out the gilbert used potter as a model for alma during her early years.
Lots of interesting thoughts - good to hear from so many of you. I am about a third through now and so far am really enjoying it! Fingers crossed it wont be another 3* read!!

I'm up to page 250 now and enjoying it more, but still not really loving it - I wish there was more about Prudence, who seems more interesting than Alma.

okay...cool!! so, i had a chance to ask gilbert a question, as part of a reading group for a toronto newspaper. because i was quite familiar with potter already, while reading about alma in TSoAT, i just kept thinking about beatrix. both women were untraditional, and working in traditionally male fields of natural science. both also had fathers who supported their endeavours. so when it came time to pose my question, i had to ask gilbert if i was imagining it, or if there was, in fact, a bit of beatrix in alma! here's where the book was featured (but be aware there may be spoilers if you haven't finished the book yet. my question is 3rd...and has no spoilers.) (:
http://arts.nationalpost.com/2013/11/...
i highly recommend Beatrix Potter: A Life in Nature, by Linda Lear - if you are interested in reading more about potter. this was a terrific biography!



I am almost done with this one - it seems to meander a little in the middle - almost losing direction but not quite. Alma is a very unique character but I really cant get my head around Prudence at all. I have just finished listening to
which interestingly is about abolition and is partially based in the same area as TSoAT. I find that after reading the Sue Kidd book I am much more interested in Prudence - her convictions and resolutions are so much more part of the world around her whereas Alma is really in a bubble of White Acre. I felt for her so much when Ambrose turned out the way he did - I wondered if such a down to earth woman would have behaved as she did and decided that yes, with that kind of isolation and naivety it was possible. Have never read this author before and I would read more of her. As I say I havent quite finished yet - am off on holiday so will get it done there!

Finished it while away - and I have to say that it filled and grew for me. I was sad when it finished. I enjoyed the originality of the characters and the fact that Alma was not a typical female protagonist - she was a risk for the author as she is not always sympathetic or someone to identify with. I felt though that it was right that she was given central stage. I still would have liked to hear more from Prudence - was she a kind, loving, principled woman who gave everything for Alma but was unable to speak with her. Or was she a total cold fish?
I also loved the breadth of this novel. Each area was very defined and easy to imagine. Henry in the first part is so easy to conjure up as a naughty, grubby Artful Dodger type character. White Acre itself was a wonderful construction, an image of powerful women quietly 'doing' while the man huffs and puffs!! Then the whole section on the island - again so clear to see and frustrating to watch as Alma wallows in her grief.
For me this novel was worth the effort of the earlier pages and the changes in pace that pepper the novel. It is not a romp - more a walk, then a burst of sprinting, followed by solid jogging!
I also loved the breadth of this novel. Each area was very defined and easy to imagine. Henry in the first part is so easy to conjure up as a naughty, grubby Artful Dodger type character. White Acre itself was a wonderful construction, an image of powerful women quietly 'doing' while the man huffs and puffs!! Then the whole section on the island - again so clear to see and frustrating to watch as Alma wallows in her grief.
For me this novel was worth the effort of the earlier pages and the changes in pace that pepper the novel. It is not a romp - more a walk, then a burst of sprinting, followed by solid jogging!
Jennifer wrote: "penny, i am really glad this turned out to be a good read for you, and worth the effort!!"
yes Jennifer - my track record recently has not been good but this one and The Invention of Wings have been my best reads of recent months.
yes Jennifer - my track record recently has not been good but this one and The Invention of Wings have been my best reads of recent months.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Invention of Wings (other topics)The Invention of Wings (other topics)
Beatrix Potter: A Life in Nature (other topics)
Stern Men (other topics)
Eat, Pray, Love (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Linda Lear (other topics)Elizabeth Gilbert (other topics)
Our book from the current list is The Signature of All Things by Elizabeth Gilbert.