A Very Short Reading Group discussion

This topic is about
Comedy
Comedy
>
Knock, Knock
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Stockton
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Nov 28, 2018 06:35AM

reply
|
flag

The holiday has given a good opportunity to catch up on the reading. I found the Comedy VSI a bit disappointing. Whilst this was a book about comedy and not a comedy book, I felt the treatment of the subject could have been a bit more light-hearted, more sparkling and less grey and turgid. It made me feel sympathy with Keats, when he criticised Newton “because he destroyed the poetry of the rainbow by reducing it to a prism”. I recommend Bevis avoids a career in stand-up because whenever he gave an example of a joke, he managed to kill it dead.
Works of critical theory often seem to attract this sort of dry, obscure, allusory, self-congratulatory writing. It doesn't have to be like that. I recommend the VSI on Poststructuralism, by Catherine Belsey, who writes with wonderful clarity.
Having been given an academic survey of comedy, I don't feel we ever got to the “prism” of why some things are funny. I would have liked to have viewed the topic through the lens of psychology, or cognitive science. There is another VSI on Humour, which looks like it might deal with these aspects (I've not read it yet) but the reviews on Goodreads seem to echo my points above for that one too.



oh no! I must be in the minority. I enjoyed it- I found that the analysis of comedy in theatre and in literature to be interesting enough that I took some notes. I do think that the topic is pretty broad and there are many angles to approach it. So I did find the author's approach fairly narrow. Anyway, looking forward to the next read!


https://www.theguardian.com/science/b...

https://www.theguardian.com/science/b..."
HA! Thanks for sharing!

Love the dolphin laughing. Here's a podcast I found in the philosophy bites series. Thoroughly recommend them. This one is 20 mind long, by the wonderful Prof Sophie Scott. (neuroscientist)