Mount TBR 2019 discussion
Level 3: Mt. Vancouver (36)
>
Sheri's search for the summit
date
newest »


Tchaikovsky did a fantastic job of imagining how a group of sentient spiders would live. Sometimes sci-fi authors write of alien cultures that ust look a bit different physically, but mostly act and think as humans do. Although spiders are not alien creatures, Tchaicovsky managed to imagine a quite different society, a different path for the development of technology, and ultimately a different solution to a very real and seemingly insurmountable problem. At the same time, he manages to comment on our society..overtly in the human chapters and through a different perspective in the spider chapters. My one complaint is the language. There were way too many f-bombs.

I had heard of the Popish plot, but if I once knew it was all a tempest in a teapot, I had forgotten. This was one of Scott's better works, I thought. There was a Romeo and Juliet aspect to the plot, although the feud was a little less intense. There were secret passages, people who weren't what they seemed to be, a noble-minded hero and a fair and upright maiden, a proud queen, a corrupt nobleman under a permissive king, and a history lesson on the days after the restoration of the English monarchy. One thing I appreciated was Scott's ability to let the reader know of the attempts and plots against the heroine's virtue without going into graphic detail. It can be done! As an aside, I was pleased to hear that my admiration of Scott as an author is shared by Professor Timothy Shute of the Modern Scholar courses.

In some ways, this was a good companion read for Children of Time. In both books I came to a point about 85% through where I thought "there is no way this can end well." In both books a...compromise? is made that avoids the abolute worst. The jury in my head is still out regarding how positive of negative the results of the alternate solution is in Children of Time...I'm waiting for the sequel. In this book, there is no good possible outcome, but something is done to avoid the greatest damage.
Although the technology is somewhat dated, I feel the writing has held up well over the years. I expected it to be suspenseful, but I didn't expect to find such true characters and so many well-turned phrases. I also appreciated the fact that although the Soviets were the enemy, the author did not demonize them. And the message of the book is still applicable today.
I did feel a little sad in reading about the president. He is never named in the book, but he is obviously based on JFK and the author obviously held him in high esteem. The publication date was October 22, 1962 which would put it after the Bay of Pigs invasion of April 17, 1961 and before JFK's assassination on November 22, 1963.

CONTAINS POSSIBLE MILD SPOILERS
Erasmus said, "The summit of happiness is reached when a person is ready to be what he is." If this is true, the un-named protagonist of Ellison's Invisible Man may be on the brink of finally being happy. Yet he almost seems to come to an absurdist point of view. He is willing to go out into the world again, but he does not hold out much hope of things changing or of his becoming "visible."
One problem is that the narrator does not always seem to know himself or realize his own potential. In his protest against the repossession, he gives a very "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" type of speech, but does not seem to mean to be speaking ironically. At Clifton's funeral, something similar happens.
The narrator also seems to be rather passive throughout the book, and consequently buffeted about by many people and circumstances.
I believe the author has a point about forcing everyone to be the same not being the solution. I also think a great part of the value of the book is its portrayal of racial tensions in both North and South in that era and also the tension between those who did not see eye to eye on how to improve things and ease that tension.

The language and crude references to sexuality made this a rougher read (or rather, listen, as I did this one on Audible) than my customary fare. But it didn't seem gratuitous; rather, it seemed realistic for the place and period of the work.
My respects to the author, however, for succeeding in making a hangman a sympathetic character. I was fascinated to read the afterward and find out about the author's family history, which explains why he wrote about a hangman.
The research seemed well-done, the mystery was interesting, and the book mentioned coffee as a relatively new drink that one character had managed to discover and quickly become addicted to. Plus I already own the next book, so I will continue this series.

This has been my least favorite so far this year. I lost interest at about 89%, but having gotten that far, I went ahead and finished. Although there were sections that were interesting, I didn't think it was that great overall. The author owes a debt to Fahrenheit 451, which he freely acknowledges, but several years ago I read an Indy book, The Book by M. Clifford, that also explored the idea of electronic books being altered. Perhaps that is one reason I didn't find this book to be "all that."

This book had sat on my shelf for quite a while--about 15 years. After discovering Ender's Game I read both of the series that followed through on what happened afterwards. Although I enjoyed them both, I found the Speaker for the Dead trilogy more profound and more to my taste than the more politically oriented Shadow series. I think I expected Ender in Exile to be more like the later. But rather it was a fascinating study of how true it is that "you can´t go home again". It explores feeling guilty vs, taking responsibility for one's actions. It explores family and sacrifice. It explores leadership and strategy. I loved the book.
I did have one bad moment though, when I recognized the events in a chapter and was afraid I had already read the book and just forgotten most of it. But I investigated and that chapter had been printed as a short story in a collection called Alien Encounters.

If I still had the comic books I owned in my youth, they would be worth something! I am just now picking up the occasional comic book again from those available to read free through Amazon Prime. I had borrowed this one sometime last year and just hadn't gotten around to it.
The graphics were great! The story was different from the movie in many points, but then again, aren't they all?

I used to live about an hour away from the crash site of Flight 93, and even though I live out of the country now, I think I have been to the site three times. The first time there wasn't much there at all, and the last time I went there was a small museum. I was given this book by a friend who had already read it, but just never got around to reading it, probably because I read much more fiction than non-fiction.
I'm glad I read it. After the initial "scene" of receiving the news of Flight 93 going down, I thought the flashback through family history could have been compacted. At times I thought it could have been told better, but I think probably the co-author wanted Lisa's voice to come through, and that's the way she told the story. The second half of the book produced tears and a renewed sense of faith in God, plus a hope that if I ever find myself in a similar situation, I can act in as courageous a manner. All in all, the book was a worthy read for the story it told, not for the writing style. But it was worthy.


12. Frayed This book begins the Dark Trench Shadow series, related to the Dark Trench Saga series. It had been a while since I read the Dark Trench Saga, but once I was back in, I was back in. I like the way Nietz explores what the world could look like were it predominately Muslim. The book also explores the ideas of free will and control, and of personal responsibility, And it does all this in a science fiction venue that captures my interest.





There was not a whole lot here that I didn't already know, but I read it at an opportune moment, when deciding what steps to take with a coworker who has a lot of good in him but always seems to be getting into problems.
The author goes chronologically through the Bible, looking at the stories of imperfect people used by a grace-giving God. He does this in a conversational style. However, there were one or two spots where he should have checked his facts a little better. But only one or two. It was a quick and interesting read, and a good read for those of us who at times tend to strictness and need a dose of mercy to take some of the starch out.

It took me a little bit to get into the story. At first it seemed to have a lot of cliched tropes, but it ended up being better than I expected. I came to care about the characters. But the most interesting thing was the religious aspect. None of the specific religions we know are mentioned overtly, bt there is a true religion and a cheap but dangerous substitute religion. The true religion is similar to an Old Testament understanding of God (there is no savior-figure, although one could perhaps argue for the Holy Spirit manifesting himself in the story a time or two). The false religion seems a cross between Islam and occultism. Yet for all the thinly veiled religious references, the author chose to use what is nowadays mild profanity, although at the time of writing some of it would have been considered pretty strong. At any rate, it is now off my TBR list but NOT in the get-rid-of pile






























Books mentioned in this topic
Cinder (other topics)Rora (other topics)
All God's Children and Blue Suede Shoes: Christians and Popular Culture (other topics)
Saving Leonardo: A Call to Resist the Secular Assault on Mind, Morals, and Meaning (other topics)
For the Sake of Elena (other topics)
More...
I enjoyed the writing, and I would never have guessed the author is not British. I appreciate that in this first volume there are hints at backstory that makes one interested in reading on in the series to find out more about the characters. As to the mystery, I figuered out some things not long before the reveal, but several others not so much. The one thing I didn't enjoy was the nastiness of the crime, although I am aware that such things are real. But a cozy this is not. If anything turns me off the series, it will be that and some of the language used. One detail in the wrap-up of a sub-plot I found to be a little too tidy, but I won't say what so as not to give a spoiler!