Horror Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
Mongrels
Group Reads
>
June 2019 Group Read #2 - Mongrels
date
newest »

i'll be joining in this one. i've never read anything by Stephen Graham Jones before. and my library has it! yay!
Ok I’m 47% into this book. It’s not really grabbing me. I could quit today and it wouldn’t bother me. Should I continue or move on?
Latasha wrote: "Ok I’m 47% into this book. It’s not really grabbing me. I could quit today and it wouldn’t bother me. Should I continue or move on?"
I'd say move on. I've seen several reviews on the book with same opinion you have. I was fence sitting on reading this one. And since I'm already a few books behind on my reading goals I'm passing on reading this one.
I'd say move on. I've seen several reviews on the book with same opinion you have. I was fence sitting on reading this one. And since I'm already a few books behind on my reading goals I'm passing on reading this one.

I would finish it.
I just finished it yesterday and found it to have an original mythology. It does weave a lot of stories into the narrative to the point that I felt they might be overloading it, but I found it worked.
I enjoyed it.

Werewolves have always been my favorite of the "classic" monsters, and this book didn't disappoint in that respect, having a lot of info and some original (to me, at least) takes on the myth, but in some ways it only provided a framework for a story that was really about family, and loyalty, and responsibility.
While there is quite a bit of action mixed in throughout, it is very character-driven. Another book I think is just brilliant but that other people find "boring" is Stewart O'Nan's The Night Country. It also focuses very much on the characters and themes, and at times the story becomes secondary. I could be way off - just a personal theory.
While I sometimes get bummed when people I usually agree with didn't care for a book I loved, If we all loved the same books, the conversations would get pretty dull here! :-)


The synopsis reminds me of a short story by Jones I read in his collection When The People Lights Go Off. This must be an expansion of that theme.
Can't wait to get started.
Cujo wrote: "Latasha wrote: "How far are you?"
only about 100 pages"
if it hasn't got you by now, i don't think it will.
only about 100 pages"
if it hasn't got you by now, i don't think it will.

Jones seems to be putting his own spin on werewolf mythology and I like where he's taking it so far. Some are more like wolves than humans with wolf-like features. Four legs are more pure blood than the two-legged werewolf variety. And have more self-control, not slaves to the moon cycles. Interesting.

Rather than a sequence of events leading up to the introduction of a major conflict, Mongrels is episodic, reading as a series of anecdotal memories - each with it’s own point to make or detail a learning experience in the maturation of our young narrator.
Not that there isn’t conflict. Two themes run throughout each chapter — survival (especially the lack of regular food, and a proper income to provide it) as well as the avoidance of discovery. This is a dysfunctional family like no other.
This has not been an easy read, despite the fireside chat/story-telling nature of the narration. Chapters jump around in time, from past to present and back again. The narrator (never identified or addressed by name so far) is eight, then ten, then thirteen years-old. The most traumatic among several disturbing events occurs in Chapter 9, which may mark a turning point.
Also a bit jolting is the occasional change in tense from chapter to chapter. After a compelling chapter of first person narration, the next chapter will be in third person. This occurs in Chapter 2, 4, 6, and 8.
It takes a bit of reading to catch onto what Jones is doing. These chapters are still told by the young narrator - - he’s just referring to himself in third person like an imaginative youngster experiencing waking dreams of which he’s the star - - - first a vampire, then a reporter, next a criminal, and finally a biologist. What he really wants most is to become a werewolf like Uncle Darren who he seems to admire and find faultless (despite plenty of evidence to the contrary).
However, Aunt Libby is just as messed up with her own self-control issues. Even wannabe girlfriend Brittany is not as perfect a fit for our narrator as she first appears. I’m not really warming up to any of these characters, except for the narrator. I wish Jones would give us a hint at a name, make him more personable to us. But, I am fascinated by each and every one of these misfits.
I’ll continue to read this, despite the eerie feeling that I’m now alone in this group discussion. (Looking over my shoulder and squinting - - Is that someone back there in the dark following me?)

Rather than ..."
I did enjoy it and I'm following the comments with interest.

Hopefully some others will pick this up before the end of the month.


The episodic chapters continue, although there are two more events that seem to be to be more of a continuing conflict than other incidents so far. I’m hoping to see them both come up again and provide some resolution/conclusion.
The chapters continue to alternate between first and third person, with the third person chapters dealing with shorter flashback scenes. Some of these seem so incidental I’m not sure why Graham chose to include them.
Our young narrator becomes a mechanic, a hitchhiker, a prisoner and a villager in those alternating chapters. Usually the choice of imaginary occupation comes from the professions of characters who he interacts with, although I’m not entirely sure who influenced him to be an imaginary criminal in an earlier chapter. We still don’t know the full name of our narrator/protagonist, although his English teacher addresses him as Mr. Tolbert (perhaps a homage to Larry Talbot, the identify of the Wolfman as portrayed in the movie by Lon Chaney Jr.)
I’m still enjoying the book, although the stop/start, episodic nature of the storytelling doesn’t compel me to read large chunks at one time, or get caught up and keep turning the pages. That makes it easy to read a chapter at a time and put it down, do something else, and come back to it whenever. If the story was more straightforward I believe I would have finished by now.

Everything ties together in a way that I didn’t see coming and I’m very satisfied with the conclusion of the book, even though things are left open enough that Jones can continue to tell stories of this family if he chooses to. Our still mostly-unnamed main character has asked multiple questions throughout the novel, which is the device Jones used to fill in all the backstory and history. However, the end of the book finally answers the biggest question of them all, one that was posed very early in the novel and reinforced throughout. I actually didn’t think this was the answer, which in hindsight was a nice surprise.
Prior to this I was enjoying the book but I didn’t think it deserved more than a three-star rating. Now I can confidently give it a four-star rating.
Had I paid more attention to the information and endorsements on the dust jacket I might have had a different approach to reading this, but I’m glad I just went for it.
The statement on the interior flap tells readers exactly what’s in store here: “A spellbinding and darkly humorous coming-of-age story about an unusual boy, whose family lives on the fringe of society and struggles to survive in a hostile world that shuns and fears them.” I couldn’t have said it better.



Books mentioned in this topic
The Night Country (other topics)Mongrels (other topics)
Remember to use spoiler tags where appropriate.
Have fun and dance in the moonlight... just look around a bit first.