21st Century Literature discussion
2019 Book Discussions
>
Painter to the King - Part 1 (spoilers allowed) (Aug 2019)
date
newest »


I didn't know much about Velázquez, and nothing about Philip IV or the Count-Duke (which I was amazed to find actually was his title, I thought it was a cheeky dig!) so I skimmed the Wikipedia entries while reading. I wasn't sure about doing that, as I thought it might detract from the way Sackville wants to reveal her characters to us, usually I would fill in any knowledge gaps after reading. But this time I had so little prior knowledge that it seems to have been useful.
I'm not so sure about the narrative asides, I found them slightly distracting, but overall I am thoroughly enjoying this fascinating novel.
Thanks Pamela - your impressions sound quite similar to mine. I hope this discussion is a slow burner and more people will join given time.

This reminds me in some ways of Wolf Hall, but with more visual input. Like 'he' is usually Cromwell, similarly a glimpse of blond hair generally refers to Philip?
How do you feel about the narrative style? How much did you know about Velázquez and the wider aspects of Spanish history? I would also be interested in any thoughts on the more visual aspects - my visual memory and imagination is very poor, but my sense was that Sackville was enable to deduce a lot from the details of the paintings.
My first impressions were that the style of the narrative takes a little getting used to - dashes and ellipses all over the place. But pretty soon I found myself gripped - I knew very little about Velázquez or seventeenth century Spain, and I loved Sackville's occasional asides about her own experiences.
Any thoughts would be welcome.