Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy discussion

83 views
Current Nominations > SF/F Book to Discuss in January 2020 selected

Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

OK, let's see if there's any interest in doing a group read & discussion of a SF/F book for next year...

To select which SF/F book we'll discuss, first we'll collect nominations for the book to be discussed.

So, please give your nominations below.

To provide a variety of nominations, you can nominate one or two titles. (If you nominate two titles, try to make one a contemporary book and the other a classic work. Use the year 2000 as a rough border between those.)

My thought is to start the discussion January 4, 2020, hopefully giving people a chance to recover from 2019 and gert some reading done.

We'll collect nominations through next Monday, Nov 18. Then we'll set up a vote to finalize the choice.


message 2: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments Ok, let's get the nominations rolling.

I know for sure I want to nominate Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. It's never been read by the group before and I have the HBO version recorded on my PVR but want to re-read beforehand :)

I still haven't quite decided on what contemporary I'll nominate, will make a separate post when I've decided.


message 3: by Indeneri (last edited Nov 12, 2019 12:10AM) (new)

Indeneri I'd like to nominate Elric of Melniboné. I see it's on the groups to-read shelf and seems to have some good reviews.


message 5: by Andrea (last edited Nov 13, 2019 02:16PM) (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments For my contemporary, I'm going to nominate The Girl in the Tower by Katherine Arden. It is the second book in the trilogy but the group already read the first book and I kept seeing people saying they were planning to read the second so perhaps we can do so together, or if you've already gone ahead and read it, can still participate in the discussion. And of course you've got a month and half to catch up on the first book if you haven't read it yet :)

I do not know if the second book will stand alone well without the first.


message 6: by [deleted user] (last edited Nov 13, 2019 08:15PM) (new)

Andrea wrote: "For my contemporary, I'm going to nominate The Girl in the Tower by Katherine Arden. It is the second book in the trilogy but the group already read the first book..."

I'm trying to remember The Bear and the Nightingale, which we discussed a year and half ago. It seems Spinning Silver, with a similar Russian setting, has driven Nightingale out of my mine.


message 7: by [deleted user] (new)

If anyone else wants to nominate something, now would be the time....


message 8: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments Was hoping we'd have more nominations, guess we'll see how the voting goes, hopefully there were fewer nominations since voters already saw something they wanted to read, and not that there are only 3 people interested in having a group read.

G33z3r, see no reason why you shouldn't toss in a nomination of your own.


message 9: by [deleted user] (last edited Nov 18, 2019 05:52PM) (new)

Announcement banner
OK, now for the hard part, finding a book more than one person wants to read... :)

I've created a poll to vote for your choice among the above nominees. Please vote here .


message 10: by [deleted user] (last edited Nov 18, 2019 05:57PM) (new)

Andrea wrote: "G33z3r, see no reason why you shouldn't toss in a nomination of your own...."

It's interesting (and possibly sad) that the top dozen titles on my current to-read list are all continuations of series (or, in one case, an Audible exclusive that wouldn't be accessible to non-Audible members.)


message 11: by Andrea (last edited Nov 19, 2019 02:22PM) (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments I figure a series continuation isn't a bad nomination if it meets certain requirements:

1 - We recently read the previous book in a group read so a certain number of us are caught up
2 - It's standalone and ok to enter the series at that point
3 - It's very popular and many are reading it anyway (we did a few buddy reads that way, and if several buddies show up, it's kind of a group read anyway)

But it is less likely to win the vote than the first book in a series indeed.

*edit*

And nice, we already have more votes than we had books so that's an excellent start!


message 12: by [deleted user] (last edited Nov 24, 2019 08:36AM) (new)

Reminder Post-it   Reminder: For anyone still making up their mind, now would be good.

You may vote here .


message 13: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments And if the book you are voting for has only one vote, can see if you are ok with one of the front runners as your second choice and changing your vote to avoid a runoff :)


message 14: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments So does that result require a runoff poll?


message 15: by Tony (new)

Tony Calder (tcsydney) | 1062 comments I don't think we need a runoff - it looks like we have a winner with Fahrenheit 451 on 4 votes, ahead of Hyperion on 3 votes. Or does it require more than 50% of the vote?


message 16: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments Usually G33z3r does the 50% thing. However maybe the people who voted for Elric and Girl in the Tower aren't interested in the other two then the vote won't change, but in theory if both have Hyperion as their second choice, then that would change the result.

@Rachel and @Indeneri

Maybe just post here if:

1 - you have no preference between Fahrenheit or Hyperion (i.e. you're fine reading either one or not interested in either)

or

2 - you do have a preference and which one


And I'm so glad I'm in Canada, Celsius is so much easier to spell...


message 17: by Tony (new)

Tony Calder (tcsydney) | 1062 comments Lol, true. Being an Aussie, I'm used to Celsius as well, but I'm not sure Celsius 232.77 would have worked quite as well as a title :)


message 18: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments Tony wrote: "Lol, true. Being an Aussie, I'm used to Celsius as well, but I'm not sure Celsius 232.77 would have worked quite as well as a title :)"

Loses something in translation indeed.


message 19: by [deleted user] (new)

OK, let's plan on discussing...

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

tentatively starting January 3, 2020, unless there's a strong preference for another date.


message 20: by Andrea (new)

Andrea | 3535 comments I like starting the year off with one of the major classics.


message 21: by [deleted user] (new)

Andrea wrote: "I like starting the year off with one of the major classics."

I like starting the year off with a bottle of scotch. :)


message 22: by [deleted user] (last edited Dec 30, 2019 04:34PM) (new)

Just a reminder that we'll be discussing ...

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

...in just a few days, starting Friday, January 3, 2020.


back to top