Mock Newbery 2026 discussion

This topic is about
From the Desk of Zoe Washington
Newbery 2021
>
March Read - From the Desk of Zoe Washington
date
newest »


I am very sensitive to the ethic and moral fiber that we present to the next generation. In my opinion, this novel contains some concerning thread. Zoe has dangerous levels of disrespect and verbal abuse aimed at several characters within the story. Zoe rationalizes her deceptive schemes on situational ethics – “maybe it was okay to do something wrong if you were doing it for the right reason.” After her web of lies leads to tensions and, the positive resolution leaves her “feeling proud of me.” Even the promotional material for the book states the problem that I have with the overall message of this novel: “The only thing she knows to be true: Everyone lies.”
I liked the concept of the book and just wished that redemption could have been sought with honesty, family communication, cooperation.






I was disappointed that Zoe was conditional on her acceptance of her father. Only if he was innocent would she want a relationship with him. Many inmates are guilty, but family members continue to communicate with them.
I agree with David Rough about the questionable morality of the disrespect and deceptive behavior Zoe exhibits toward adults in her life. Zoe would not accept her father if he was a liar, but is willing to engage in that behavior herself.
There are few juvenile books for children of incarcerated parents. This is an important addition despite the notes weaknesses.










That's what we are finding also. Overdrive is going to be over working!!! Thanks and stay safe everyone. See you on the other end.


Rated this 3 stars. Grandmother enabling Zoe to write and talk to her father in spite of the mother's wishes...yikes. Wrong on so many levels.


I didn’t like that the dad was given up on by Zoey’s mom and grandmother since his court trial. He swore he was innocent but he was completely abandoned and kept from his child. The dad didn’t come close to fitting the profile of a murderer. No motive, personality or temperament. Also the chance that Zoey didn’t intercept a letter from him in all the years he had been writing is pretty unlikely. The adults were portrayed as pretty unreasonable. Zoey didn’t trust her mom hence all the lying and secrecy.

I had trouble getting excited about the baking plot because I don't bake. There are books that make me care about things like coin collecting or roller derby in spite of a lack of interest, but this book couldn't pull it off.
I look forward to seeing the other books that 2020 has to offer. I'm also interested in seeing how the books of 2021 will reflect on the COVID experience.

Now did the plot have more holes than swiss cheese? Did Zoe's collusion with her grandmother to continually deceive her mother really push acceptable behavior for any child? Did things get tidied up so neatly it felt rushed on the huge subject of unfairly incarcerated black men in America, the toll it takes on families but most of all on the children who grow up not knowing their dads? And did Zoe possess super human powers to solve what was an open and shut case of wrongful conviction with no grey areas, and adults who could only sit by and marvel? Well, yes to all, and it keeps the story from that Newbery A level status. But it's an appetizing choice, thanks to Marks offering up a fast moving read with a slice of social realism on the side, and making it palatable for readers who will be craving Zoe's Fruit Loops cupcakes (recipe included.) Great title for book groups, activity included!


I am not sure if my link to Goodreads will work on here or not. I will copy and paste later if not. So glad that I finally got my hands on this title.
So... is it distinguished?