Appointment With Agatha discussion
Archive - 2020 Christie reads
>
Thirteen Problems (spoiler-free)




However, I also don't remember many (any?) of the stories, so who knows, maybe I'll enjoy the book more this time around? I'm certainly intrigued to find out if Miss has grown on me.

I already have it on audio and I'm really looking forward to listening to it again.


Becks - so fun to see you here!

And now you've just given me a reason to skip over Farjeon's 13 for Dinner. I don't know why I keep avoiding that book, but seeing as how I'm already reading this one...


I really like the way that she uses the frame of the Tuesday night club/conversations among friends to tie them together. That helps me to move forward because I'm enjoying the camaraderie between friends. My problem with short stories is that I really prefer longer works, so having some sort of a linkage between stories helps me to keep reading.
I don't know that I can pick a favorite, but I really enjoyed The Bloodstained Pavement and The Thumbmark of St. Peter, which show off Marple's skills to such excellent advantage. And I thought that Motive v Opportunity was such a clever little story. If there was a dud among them, I would say that Jane Helier's story was the weakest, but it was also completely in character for her to tell a story that was really just about herself.
Sir Henry Clithering is one of my favorite recurring characters in the Marple books, and seeing him here for the first time is so much fun. These stories really explain how Sir Henry becomes so respectful of Miss Marple's skill at understanding human nature, and he remains her champion throughout the novels.

I've gotten through 8 of the stories so far, and Sir Henry has really stood out to me for exactly that reason. I know I've read some of the books he's in before, but I don't really remember him, so it's going to be interesting to return to them and see how these stories change how I read them.


It is. We get another actress named Jane (Wilkinson) in Lord Edgware Dies. I wonder if Jane Helier was the (loose, since the two characters are quite different) inspiration for that Jane?
She does use the name Jane at least one other time off the top of my head - Jane Grey in Death in the Clouds. It's a common name, though, so it may mean nothing.

It is. We get another actress named Jane (Wilkinson) in [book:Lord Edg..."
Raymond's fiancée actually changes her name somewhere mid-season (Joyce / vs. Jane). That said, as my favorite example shows (Gladys the maid(s)), Christie certainly did reuse first names.
Btw, did the name "Little Paddocks" (as also seen / heard in "A Murder Is Announced") stand out to anyone else?

The Tuesday Night club setting really makes this collection stand out.
I loved re-discovering how some of my favourite stories started since Christie tended to re-work characters and ideas from short stories into her novels.
@Christine PNW - I think you said the same earlier, too.
My least favourite of the stories (The Four Suspects) actually made me laugh because I could see the story acting as a catalyst for two of the novels - one that I really like a lot, and one that is ... well ... I think to say more might be a spoiler.

It is. We get another actress named Jane (Wilkin..."
Re Little Paddocks - Yes, it did. As did the names - I found this quite confusing at times because some of the names are so similar (or the same) as those of characters in other books. So it was quite a task sometimes to disassociate the name from the characters in the other books.
Oh, and I did laugh at the comment about gardeners in of the stories. Christie had a thing about gardeners, usually poking fun at them. As she did here.

I get a total kick out of hearing / reading him say, at the beginning of the second set of the "Tuesday Club" meetings, "None of us even realized she was playing, but to everybody's surprise she bested us every single time." He clearly still had a long way to go to his praise of her in later novels, but double thumbs up to him for having the stature to acknowledge and champion her abilities without any reserve whatsoever (and for insisting that she be invited to the second round in the first place).


This one reminded me of some other stories as well - put it in spoiler tags in the spoiler thread & we'll see if we're the same!

I found I was already engaged by the end of the foreword. I'm delighted that Christic prefers Marple to Poirot. I take it as a sign of my own good taste :-)
When she concluded with:
'These Thirteen Problems contain, I consider, the real essence of Miss Marple for those who like her.
I knew I was in for a treat.
In my ignorance, I had passed over this collection and moved from 'A Murder At The Vicarage' to 'The Body In The Library'. I'm so glad that this group has helped me correct that error.
I've read the first story and I'm alread applauding Miss Marple's wit and dry humour. She inserts herself into the game being played by these bright people and outwits effortlessly, except perhaps for dropping a stitch and even that may have been theatre on her part - no one present would have been able to challenge her statement.
She is playing with this group, gently but wickedly.
I love the:
‘I am right, am I not? It seems so clear to me. the XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX—and the XXXXX—I mean, one cannot miss it.’
As if she weren't perfectly aware that none of these clever folks has a clue.
Then, after having demonstrated that her understanding of depravity is deeper than her companions, she ends with this piece of insincerity:
"It is all very distressing and painful, and not a very nice thing to talk about."

And of course, "Oh, I'm expressing this so badly / I find it so difficult to express myself clearly" etc. ... just so as not to make everybody else feel too badly about having been bested by her yet again! :D

She may do it to spare the feelings of others, but this is what drives me the craziest about Miss Marple. Comes to close to simpering for my tastes. (Though I like her better than Poirot.)

She may do it to spare the feelings of others, bu..."
I think her simpering is aggressive. She uses it as a test and a weapon. a test to see who is dumb enough to believe her and a weapon to warn off or enlist the ones smart enough to see what's she's doing.


I do see the points about Marple that can be aggravating. She rather sits in the sidelines very innocently and then dives in for the kill. « Oh I’m sorry, did I just put you in your place? Serves you right. Oh dear me, I’ve dropped a stick, now where was I... » lol

I prefer Poirot, but I also enjoyed this book more than Poirot Investigates (which I am ashamed to admit that I haven't quite finished! Quelle horreur for the moderator to not have finished the book!).
I think I just enjoyed the set up of this book a lot more. It almost feels like a novel. I really liked "linked" short stories, as it turns out.



I love this observation!

And though I started just last night, I'm already four stories in. I'm enjoying them, but I'm still figuring out how to read them -- whether I should take my time and pick up the clues, or just enjoy the ride. I'm finding that these stories really can be read either way: the hints are there, but I can just enjoy the set-ups and wait for the revelations. I am getting a little annoyed, though, with how Jane Marple seems the only one capable of working out the solutions. That may be fine in a novel, but in a succession of stories it feels more like one of those philosophical dialogues in which one interlocutor is meant to be "right" and everyone else is just a poor foil.

Hooray! Hi Mark! I'm glad you're joining us.
I usually prefer to enjoy the ride but I have to say that with these short stories I found it more enjoyable to read them slowly and pick up on the clues.
And, yes, I share your thoughts on Miss Marple. ;)

I agree that this is a great observation, though it's one that I don't quite fully appreciate as I haven't read many English mysteries before now.

Thanks! I got a later start than I intended, though I should be done with the book by the end of the day.
One thing that I do appreciate is how deftly Christie walks a line in these stories. They can't help but be formulaic, yet they're different enough so that it doesn't feel repetitious. The eleventh chapter ("the Herb of Death") is an excellent example of this, as rather than have Mrs. Bantry relate the case with just the right amount of detail she does what seems far more realistic to me, which is that she relates the basic details and the rest comes out through careful questioning. It thought that made for a particularly effective variation on what Christie had done up to that point.


I totally agree. This was my second time reading and I loved it even more this time around. I am not a short story fan, but I make an exception for Agatha because her short stories are just so freaking good, and the Marples are some of the best.

Definitely! I am only a fan of those who can write exceptional short stories. In the wrong hands I find myself irritated because they author cannot develop the characters in the time/pages they have provided us and or the plot makes no sense since they are trying to get to an ending.


I love seeing how everyone has favourites and how these all differ.
I rather like The Affair at the Bungalow, too, btw.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Murder at the Vicarage (other topics)The Murder at the Vicarage (other topics)
The Body in the Library (other topics)
Death in the Clouds (other topics)
Lord Edgware Dies (other topics)
Agatha Christie's website describes it thus:
The Tuesday Night Club is a venue where locals challenge Miss Marple to solve recent crimes. One Tuesday evening a group gathers at Miss Marple’s house and the conversation turns to unsolved crimes. The case of the disappearing bloodstains; the thief who committed his crime twice over; the message on the death-bed of a poisoned man which read ‘heap of fish’; the strange case of the invisible will; a spiritualist who warned that ‘Blue Geranium’ meant death. Now pit your wits against the powers of deduction of the ‘Tuesday Night Club’.
This is one of my favorite collections! The conceit of the Tuesday Night Club around which it is arranged is a lot of fun, and we encounter some of the characters who show up in the full length Marple novels, including Sir Henry Clithering, Colonel and Dolly Bantry and Raymond West.
Enjoy! No spoilers on this thread, please!
Thread is now open.