Never too Late to Read Classics discussion

Our Russian classic, Oblomov by Ivan Goncharov , led to the creation of a new word-Obomovism.
If you read the book, you'll know what it refers to.

Who's in?

I listened to Oblomov in August. I like Russian classics and this was no exception. It was a serious and humorous study of character. Tragedy and comedy together.

That is so true. I liked Oblomov, who didn't have a mean bone in his body.

I was going to join in, Rosemarie. Then I found the copy to which I had access is an abridged version. That dampened my enthusiasm.

That is too bad, Piyangie.
But the thread will still be open if you do get a chance to read it.
I think I know which section was left out-the whole section where Oblomov does not appear, and it's also the only boring section!

Rosemarie wrote: "That is too bad, Piyangie.
But the thread will still be open if you do get a chance to read it.
I think I know which section was left out-the whole section where Oblomov does not appear, and it's a..."

Do you think reading the abridged would be okay, Rosemarie? I was afraid I might lose on important parts.

The section that was abridged is really boring, so I think the abridged version would be okay.
I read it not that long ago, so if you outline the main plot lines, I should be able to tell you if you're missing anything important.

Oblomov is a likeable character, in his own special way.

Thanks, Rosemarie. The synopsis of my copy says that the story is about the midlife crisis of a man. So I figure this copy may be confined to that interestng part of the story where Oblomov is present. I'll read it anyway a little later in the month. If I have questions while reading, I'll certainly turn to you. Thanks for your kind offer.

The first part of the book deals with a much younger Oblomov. The description you mentioned sounds wrong. I wonder if it's even the same book?
I read this version:Oblomov.

Piyangie wrote: "Thanks, Rosemarie. The synopsis of my copy says that the story is about the midlife crisis of a man. So I figure this copy may be confined to that interestng part of the story where Oblomov is pres..."

That is completely different from the synopsis of the book I read-see link above.

Rosemarie wrote: "The first part of the book deals with a much younger Oblomov. The description you mentioned sounds wrong. I wonder if it's even the same book?
I read this version:Oblomov."

My god yes, Rosemarie. It looks like a completely different book. What you've read is way too different from the copy I have. I think I'll postpone the reading till I can buy a proper unabridged version.

I recommend the Penguin version. I bought an ebook version that was reasonably priced, and I enjoyed the translation. Of course, the paperback version is available as well, but I think it cost more.

Rosemarie wrote: "I recommend the Penguin version. I bought an ebook version that was reasonably priced, and I enjoyed the translation. Of course, the paperback version is available as well, but I think it cost more."

I'll have to resort to the ebook. It's difficult to order physical copies these days from this part of the world. Not to mention whether I'll properly receive them with so many delays in the local postal service. Thanks for the recommendation, Rosemarie. I'll check it out.