Practicing Thought Experiments, aka spiritual warfare in Conceptualworld, Imaginationland, aka THE MATRIX discussion

Scientists are starting to prove simulation theory, that reality is literally like the matrix movie alludes! Although simulation theory, like evolution theory, has been philosophized for millennia, only now in modern times, we have found SOME evidence for both theories. But one theory must trump the other. You cannot totally trust the 5 physical sense "evidence" if we are in a matrix that was designed to deceive the 5 senses. Makes logical sense, right? So, simulation theory is where Darwin's evolution theory was about 150 years ago but is making fast progress in recognition. They say, if computer power keeps growing at the current rate, we will build an actual matrix in maybe 50 years or less. Then it will be more intuitive for people to understand we just exist in another layer of matrix that God programmed. Then it will be easier for most to understand that simulation theory trumps evolution theory. True elect like me in the future, could create a matrix simulation program to demonstrate. I used to program computers even, but in 50 years it will be even more complicated computer techniques. My program would have a person enter the simulation and show them a reality so much like the current "real world" that they can't even tell they just stepped into a computer program of the so-called "real world." The room will initially look the same. Then they go "outside" and talk to "people" who will talk like real people about beliefs like evolution. A stranger will pick up a stray "cat" and say it is proven fact it evolved from "dogs." But unlike this reality, which has NO solid evidence for macro-evolution (change into different species), this simulated person will be able to take the user to a computer simulation of a real computer and pull up tons of data and scientific evidence to PROVE macro-evolution 100%. The data will show crock-a-duck, clear proof of macro-evolution that only a fool would deny. The museums will have fossils with clear crock-a-duck type fossils going back billions of years... nah, actually, I will program trillions of years into the simulation to make it more realistic, for a mere postulated 5 billion year old earth CANNOT create such genetic diversity like we have. Then I might even program this fake reality to be able to make it possible to create life from non-life and watch it evolve naturally over trillions of years in the lab, as my simulation will also be able to isolate the lab experiment environment inside a time-bubble and do some Einstein type time dilation inside the experiment to simulate evolution over trillions of years. But simulated evolution in an entirely simulated environment does NOT make sense to totally trust such evidence, right? A science mind should understand that. I could easily then hit a programmed button and to cause the simulation to change around the real human, so that everybody around the real human in the simulation thinks their "universe" is even untold trillions of years older than the last simulation, and the evidence for evolution even stronger, and only an insane person would deny it!

I trust my reader understands my analogy. Even in this fiction future (no longer fiction in less than 50 years probably, if computer power keeps advancing) THERE WILL ALWAYS BE PEOPLE WHO WILL SPIN THEORIES TO DENY THE OBVIOUS AND "PROVE" WHAT THEY WANT TO BELIEVE! There is no God? Who started the first simulation then? Even if I create a simulated world wherein intelligent beings create simulations within simulations within simulations, etc.... there always must be an intelligent first cause Being (ie God) to start all the simulations. Makes logical sense, right? It takes great intelligence to program a complex computer generated simulation of reality. And within such a simulation, it is NOT logical or common sense to totally trust so-called "hard" evidence for evolution, even if there was such evidence. The reality is (as far as reality can speak in our current fake matrix--soon to be proven I am right about this) there is NO HARD EVIDENCE for evolution, only SOFT evidence. But even if you had TONS of real hard evidence (which scientists do not have), it still don't mean squat in the matrix which deceives the 5 physical senses! One is NOT very logical or scientific if he or she insists I speak error here. Such a person has no choice but to try to prove/believe simulation theory is nonsense, because such carnal dominated human psyche simply cannot accept there is a God, and such a one simply must find some way to deny the obvious. This is why simulation theory trumps evolution theory, although both have some evidence in modern times. Soon, we will build an actual matrix and honest scientists will have to admit, the evidence points to some mysterious Creator God that NONE will ever fully understand. Except me, of course, because God speaks to me and explains these obvious and evident things. :-)

Simulation theory will trump evolution theory in probably less than 50 years, whereas Darwin's theory required 150 years to gain massive worldwide support. I have a scientific left brain (prove truth) like everybody, but I also try to connect with intuitive right brain (sense truth) too. I don't pretend one can come to correct conclusions without engaging both sides of the brain in a balanced way. I say we do have enough data to draw proper conclusions right now about UFOs and reality itself, and that statement is partly intuitively discerned. My simulation argument is part science and part intuition. One really can't have evolution AND simulation both 100% trustworthy truth always at the same time, and one should admit humans should NOT trust evolution evidence then 100%, but most still choose to believe there is no master programmer (God) and everything is totally random. That is unbalanced left brain thinking. Even if I could prove the resurrection of Christ, the scientific left brain would be inclined to spin that as just a random natural process resurrection then. We all spin things how we want to believe, me included, but I say I connect with God in my right side brain too and that is why my understanding is more correct than most.

Here is a little bit of both science and intuition prediction of the future, and although none can prove what will happen in the future, I hope my readers can hear rationality in what I am about to write. In 1969, the Honeywell Kitchen Computer was marketed as a luxury gift item, and would have inaugurated the era of home computing, but none were sold. Computers became affordable for the general public in the 1970s due to the mass production of the microprocessor starting in 1971. So, that's about 50 years ago that home computers started to take off. And what do we have today? Computer power in a cell phone alone way beyond the first computers, graphics already very realistic and off the charts in worldwide online internet gaming, already gamers playing avatars in simulated worlds portending what is coming in a better actual matrix one day. They already have virtual reality goggles and computer simulated ping pong games so realistic that players forget they are in a simulation. Books by Rizwan Virk, creator of these types of current virtual reality (VR) simulations, tell of his personal stories of almost falling over after playing ping pong in a VR simulation because he forgot there was no real table there and almost leaned on it!

Rizwan Virk's profile and I highly recommend his books on simulation theory.

Genesis 1:30, KJV, "And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so." This is one of many supernatural verses that prove simulation theory, as after the fall of Adam and Eve by eating the forbidden fruit, the nature of animals changed. This simulation of reality instantly changed! Lions would have previously used their sharp teeth and claws to dig up carrots and such from the ground in their hunt for food, but now lions use those same teeth/claws to hunt and kill and eat other animals! Humans are now predatory in their own ways, and some are literal cannibals, though such has always been rare in human history. None can deny that humans are very animalistic and predatory though in many ways, and this is why many believe humans evolved from animals, since we can act like animals in so many ways! There has been NO real advancement, and there will NOT be any, until UFO demons are gone!

So, anyway, all this computer advancement in only 50 years? And do any really doubt another 50 years could easily create a realistic matrix just like the movie??? So, my example above of a person in the future entering a simulation of reality apparently trillions of years old with 100% solid proof of macro-evolution is impossible? We don't even have 100% proof of macro-evolution for this universe, but most choose to believe it over anything else, but even if humans had such proof, it means nothing in the matrix, which was designed to deceive the 5 physical senses.

The ultimate truth is we are in a simulation of reality, and everything our 5 senses detect is only an approximation of true reality at the next level. We are both in our own solipsism reality AND also in a shared reality at the same time. Another computer example might help explain. Add a layer of complexity to my above simulation example where the person entering the simulation is also in the simulation with some other legitimate humans. One person's reality can be very similar to another human's but it can also be drastically different and none be the wiser. One person in the sim has computer settings that show tables as pink and another person jacked in on the other side of the planet has computer settings that show tables as blue. Neither is aware of each other's tainted reality, unless they start asking good questions. But even then it doesn't necessarily mean anything. One person can say to the other, "Tables are pink" and the master programmer observing can instantly override the transmission to the other who hears, "Tables are blue." They both nod their heads with satisfaction that they agree on an obvious truth, but they are both in error. This example could work in the reverse too, where two are arguing over some apparent obvious error/lie, but they are both right. We can still have some meaningful interactions with others, despite most who claim solipsism is an absolute absurdity and makes everything meaningless. My reality may yet see a UFO open contact similar to what I envision, and many of my readers may just experience a future realistic matrix sim in 50 years, which will hopefully at least jog their memories I wrote about it before it happened.

In a sim there are also non-player characters who are not connected to a real human at all, just a part of the program that the master programmer can use to subtly interact with real humans jacked in. Can anyone reading this now even prove I am 100% human? Think about it. Simulation theory that proves there must be a God will never be popular, but the future world's authority and majority will at least declare simulation is as much "fact" as evolution. But of course, the governments of the world will also mandate some type of covid-19 virus type declaration that you must comply with ungodly nonsense or you will be banned from public gatherings (for your "safety", yeah right), barred entry into businesses unless you comply, perhaps fired from your job to keep the rest of the "sane" people safe from your nonsense that the evidence just proves God, rather than the standard party line you are supposed to comply with: There is no God because ____________ says so! (insert Neil deGrasse Tyson, or any other person who denies the obvious...they are all the same to me)