Tournament of Books discussion

This topic is about
Matrix
2022 TOB The Books
>
Matrix
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Amy
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Dec 13, 2021 10:18AM

reply
|
flag

Obviously I have to read a bunch more, but this is my favorite so far.






I can see that a slower plot might be an issue for some, but that wasn't a problem for me.

Ha! I wonder how this plays for men vs. women...I'm sure many men appreciate Matrix, but it seems to have been written primarily for women.

Okay, lol, obviously I misinterpreted. I thought you were so bored with it that you dropped it for a mindless (sorry, I did like it the couple of times I played) word game.

Okay, lol, obviously I misinterpreted. I thought you were so bored with it that you dropped it for a mindless (sorry, ..."
Today's word brought me to this thread specifically. If anyone else plays, they will likely check in here as well. I'm being vague because I don't want to spoil today's game.

Re Matrix, I liked it quite a lot. A solid four stars for me. The community was fascinating, and I love how Marie pushed against so many of the conventions of the time. On the downside, the story was a bit too episodic for me, which led to more of a sketchy feel to the narrative. I wanted more depth and detail. I loved Fates and Furies, which is a book with tons of daily depth and detail.


Very fortuitous.




I agreed about the climate change, it felt like it was just on Groff's mind when she was writing it (as it is on all of our minds) but it didn't relaly feel authentic to me...
I was not a big fan of this book to be honest. Itwas really beautifully written, but I just felt like all the characters other than Marie could have been basically interchangeable. There was also just not very much at stake with any of the conflicts and the conflicts resolve themselves and time marches on 10 years, 20 years, and it feels like none of the conflicts have any bearing on future conflicts, or change Marie's character.(view spoiler) It just felt choppy to me. And the overall effect was that I was pretty bored, even though it seemed like this book would be right up my alley--I love historical fiction with strong women characters, I spent a month in a convent and I love really lyrical writing...but this one was just sadly not for me.

Everything felt out of place for me in this book. I didn't believe any of it. On the other hand, take that with a grain of salt because I really haven't liked anything else from Groff either. Her style and my tastes don't mesh, unfortunately.

Everything felt out of place for me in this bo..."
I'm seeing more and more of this kind of historical fiction, that intentionally ignores historical constraints for the larger purposes of the book - kind of a fiction version of the theatrical breaking the fourth wall. I love it. Sometimes it's done like a small roadside bomb (almost literally in Laurus, where there's a plastic bottle at the side of the road in what otherwise appears to be a straightforward setting in the Middle Ages). In Matrix, I see it in service of a feminist atmosphere.
Is there a name for this kind of historical fiction?



I see (and appreciate) your comment and raise you one - best representation of females in relationship to each other in all kinds of ways, including friendship :)
It wins the Bechdel Test lifetime achievement award!


Lordy Daniel, with friends like that absolutely nobody needs enemies.

And we've been loving Wordle in my house! The only-one-per-day factor is key. I don't think we did the one on the 13th... was the word matrix that day?

It seems like a lot of readers found the characters interchangeable, but it's funny - for me all the characters seemed so distinct, and in my review I marveled about it, since there were so many nuns, living such monotonous lives :)

I disagree with those who liked Marie- I started to hate her after what she did to the pregnant girl. Also she was very power-hungry and greedy and seemed like a narcissist in thinking she was some kind of saint or even a god/goddess herself. One theme of the book to me seemed to be that power corrupts and that religious leaders can do evil things whether they're male or female. Maybe that just comes from my bias against religion due to previous religious trauma. But I think there was a quote to that extent in the book even.
I enjoyed seeing how the abbey was like a feminist utopia for women to take care of each other communally (mostly, although when they sinned they were treated horribly by other women who were hypocrites, so, not that much different than living in a man's world, IMO) and at the comparisons between Catholicism and mysticism. I liked the detailed character study although I didn't like the character.
I give the book 3.5 stars. Did anyone else listen to the audiobook? I liked the narrator's different voices but I HATED how she read summarized dialogue as if the character was actually saying it; it drove me crazy. But at least it was entertaining whereas I think I would have been more bored reading it in book form.