Literary Fiction by People of Color discussion
Buddy Reads
>
Buddy Read: Glorious / Bernice L. McFadden
date
newest »

message 1:
by
ColumbusReads
(new)
Jan 20, 2022 02:13PM

reply
|
flag

Oh ok..thought it was to start on the 19th..I'd better start bookmarking. Memory ain't what it used to be!
Jan wrote: "That prologue! She is not playing."
Jan, I was simply not ready for that. I had to readjust my coif.
Jan, I was simply not ready for that. I had to readjust my coif.
I finished the book early this morning. Did you all finish it? I picked up the physical book from the library but never read it. I read the ebook on my phone/ipad. My first ebook in like forever.
Ok, so I have 2 questions I wanted to ask each of you before we start discussing the book:
1) What Goodread rating would you give it?
2) What other books by Bernice McFadden have you read and where would this one fall in that group?
Ok, so I have 2 questions I wanted to ask each of you before we start discussing the book:
1) What Goodread rating would you give it?
2) What other books by Bernice McFadden have you read and where would this one fall in that group?

It was less engaging than both "Book of Harlan' and "{Nowhere is a Place" .
Thanks, William.
I was thinking the same thing for years about the GR rating system, but, particularly as it relates to this book. I gave it a 3 but would’ve loved to have given it 3.5.
In order of preference:
Praise Song For The Butterflies
Sugar
Glorious
The beginning was incredibly intriguing but the latter part was sort of uneven in my opinion.
I was thinking the same thing for years about the GR rating system, but, particularly as it relates to this book. I gave it a 3 but would’ve loved to have given it 3.5.
In order of preference:
Praise Song For The Butterflies
Sugar
Glorious
The beginning was incredibly intriguing but the latter part was sort of uneven in my opinion.


lark wrote: "I follow Bernice Mcfadden on Twitter and she is a lovely personal presence there. She just posted this morning--it may be that this is common knowledge with her fans but it was the first I'd heard ..."
Chompin’ at the idea of reading a memoir by her. I would love to hear her insight on her writing style or anything else she’s willing to share.
Chompin’ at the idea of reading a memoir by her. I would love to hear her insight on her writing style or anything else she’s willing to share.

Here is a link to the post that caught my eye:
https://twitter.com/queenazsa/status/...

This is my fourth BLM book. So far, I am even more impressed with it than I was The Book of Harlan, Gathering of Waters, and Praise Song for the Butterflies, and those were all four-star reads for me. Too early to say where Glorious will end up. I have a paperback of Sugar on my shelves that I aim to read "someday."
Excited to read her memoir!
lark wrote: "McFadden says on Twitter that her memoir is called First Born Girls and is coming in 2023. There isn't a goodreads bookpage for it yet.
Here is a link to the post that caught my eye:
https://twitt..."
Well, you already know that she will be as candid and honest as always. I can think of few other author memoirs’ I would want to read more.
Here is a link to the post that caught my eye:
https://twitt..."
Well, you already know that she will be as candid and honest as always. I can think of few other author memoirs’ I would want to read more.

That's ok--I don't mind being spoiled and I will finish up soon.



I love reading books where authors integrate real people into books. It’s not always done successfully though. McFadden seemed to have a ball using among others: - -Marcus Garvey, Fays Waller, Ota Benga (on “display” at the Bronx zoo in 1906) A’Lelia Walker (Madam C.J. Walker’s daughter), Carl Van Vechten, Langston Hughes, Wallace Thurman, Zora Neale Hurston, Gladys Bentley and
Maude Cuney Hare (who I had never heard of). - - Let’s see, who did I miss? - She sort of played a little loose with the facts on the Marcus Garvey shooting. Although I understand that’s done at times to enhance the story, I didn’t care for how it was done here.
Maude Cuney Hare (who I had never heard of). - - Let’s see, who did I miss? - She sort of played a little loose with the facts on the Marcus Garvey shooting. Although I understand that’s done at times to enhance the story, I didn’t care for how it was done here.
After reading this book, I’m looking for a nice, big biography on Marcus Garvey. What a fascinating man!


I just did a bit of digging and am going to order Negro with a Hat: The Rise and Fall of Marcus Garvey and His Dream of Mother Africa by Colin Grant. It has good reviews and includes social history as context for Garvey's life, which I would like. Plus Grant is a Jamaican living in Britain.
Jan wrote: "ColumbusReads wrote: "After reading this book, I’m looking for a nice, big biography on Marcus Garvey. What a fascinating man!"
I just did a bit of digging and am going to order [book:Negro with a..."
Oh, yes. NEGRO WITH A HAT got a starred review from both Kirkus and Publishers Weekly. They aren’t exactly liberal with those starred reviews. Thanks I’m gonna check to see if a hardbound is available
.
I just did a bit of digging and am going to order [book:Negro with a..."
Oh, yes. NEGRO WITH A HAT got a starred review from both Kirkus and Publishers Weekly. They aren’t exactly liberal with those starred reviews. Thanks I’m gonna check to see if a hardbound is available
.

In the acknowledgements pages in my ebook she says she was visited by and talked to the ghosts/spirits of Zora Hurston and Nella Larsen. That is how and why she conceived and wrote this book. In their honor.

Saartjes Baartman

Cool! The acknowledgements were not included in the audiobook, so thanks for sharing that.
I wonder what Bernice McFadden thinks about this book. I’m not sure where this book falls in her oeuvre, if it’s one of her earlier books or not. I ask that because the writing in Praise Song is so significantly better. Do you agree or not? Like would she write this story differently? And yet, I still really like the book. It’s immensely flawed but the story is so damn good. What are your thoughts?
Ok, I checked it out. GLORIOUS was published in 2010 and PRAISE SONG 8 years later in ‘18. Between then she had GATHERING OF WATERS and BOOK OF HARLAN. I don’t know anything about GATHERING but I do know HARLAN was praised by critics and many of my book friends. I was under the impression that LOVING DONOVAN was a later book but it was actually released in ‘03.

Back in 2016 when the group discussed "Harlan" Ms. McFadden was and is a LFPC member. It was one of my most memorable book discussions. We actually shared a few DMs. Perhaps she's monitoring this thread?
I suppose that no matter how comfortable one gets...you can never forget the strange fruit..that was cut out in front of you. Faced with such brutality..so soon in these pages, will there be some revenge?..I read on looking for it but instead found a very different story. . a queer and bisexual recounting of the Harlem Renaissance? Lets talk about Rain,


Welcome, Kim. I think Rain and Meredith were both looking out for their own self interests. Meredith had the additional weight of white prejudice and attitudes of that era. I saw Meredith as one of those wealthy whites who saw being a patron of Black artists as a way to be cool and avant garde, but when she had the opportunity to rip off Easter's work and claim it as her own, Meredith was quick to take it. :-(

I agree, the writing in Praise Song for the Butterflies was better, but I found a lot of beautiful sentences in Glorious too.

I saw the book as a meditation on how white cruelty and white supremacy impinged on the life of a queer Black woman over the course of her life, including her years as part of the Harlem Renaissance. I was glad McFadden sweetened the ending a bit with the visit of the Black journalist.

Is it too early to ask about what you saw as flaws? I read a ton of fiction but don't see myself as an especially sophisticated reader.
The major flaw I saw was that some of the character's choices seemed to be made because the plot required them, which I guess is a way of saying that their actions didn't seem to grow out of the characters as they'd been presented to us.
I did like the jump from Meredith plagiarizing Easter's draft to 1961...it was a shocking but effective way of showing what that theft meant in Easter's life.

I also like the ahistorical nature of her writing--she is in some way being true to the history, but doesn't care if the details work out in terms of dates and places and people. The Ota Benga part seemed about 20 years out of sync with reality (?) although I'm not sure. But McFadden wanted to write about that odious historical chapter, so here it is.