The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
Pandora's Star
Pandora's Star
>
PS: The Book's Pacing: Is it Slow For You, Too?


I now think I have more of an understanding for those that complain about Stephenson, or Gibsons books. For some reason I’ve never found their worldbuilding or side track descriptions boring, although that was pushed to the edge in the Quicksilver series. But I’ve heard others mention it before. I guess this is a similar style, but the things he chooses to emphasize are just not things I’m interested in.



I think this is true of anything, really, regardless of length. If you’re into it, it doesn’t matter how long it is.
That’s why some people love LotR or 2001: A Space Odyssey while others are bored to tears by them.
That said, pacing is a real thing that has a real effect. Avengers: Endgame is a full 30 minutes longer than 2001: ASO, but it *feels* like it’s an hour shorter. But even a book or movie that’s slower paced can be riveting if you like it, in which case one is likely to call it “stately” or “deliberate”. If one *doesn’t* like it, then it gets labeled “slow” and “dull”.

First Hamilton? :)
I'm skipping this since I've read a couple of his books (Judas Unchained, The Dreaming Void) and simply don't care for the overly detailed (in both world building and subplots) style even though the writing as writing (on a paragraph and scene level) is quite good. He could shorten things by not having 83 subplots in his books but that's kind of his thing.
I don't know anyone who's read him and is in the middle though. I think you are either really drawn into the world and plots he builds or you aren't. For me, while some stories do need 1000 pages to tell, many do not and it feels like he writes so that all of his books are quite long, complicating them with subplots and asides that really aren't needed to tell the main story. Again, some love this. I don't, but I'll be really intrigued to see what the group thinks.



Yep. I actually may be one of the few in the middle. I am enjoying many of the plots themselves, and like you said he is good at actually writing. But while some authors know the full backstory of there fictional worlds (it helps them stay consistent, and tell the stories they want to tell). Most are either self, or by others edited down to keep the story moving more.
I'm also reading The Player of Games, my second Banks after Consider Phlebas and this style reminds me a bit of that. Where a lot of the side tracks have no bearing on the main plot at all. It's like the opposite of a Chekhov's gun. And while I guess that is closer to real life, it just seems like a waste to me. I think while Stephenson puts in the extensive detail, it usually ends up being at least somewhat related to the plot, or at the very least teaches you something about the real world. I don't think I will read any more Banks, and I will see about Hamilton.
But everyone's millage may very and I can see how some would feel comfortable in this writing style.
I thought the Justine flying scene was amazing and that whole scene does become important for several storylines further along in both books.
Things that seem unimportant and people who seem like background characters will often become more important to the story later.
I had no problem with the pacing. I enjoyed the multiple POV chapters and the world building. It does all come together. Many characters and storylines will meet and overlap.
I know many of you won't get there, but the second half of Judas Unchained is a "put your seatbelt on and hang on for the ride" action thriller.
Things that seem unimportant and people who seem like background characters will often become more important to the story later.
I had no problem with the pacing. I enjoyed the multiple POV chapters and the world building. It does all come together. Many characters and storylines will meet and overlap.
I know many of you won't get there, but the second half of Judas Unchained is a "put your seatbelt on and hang on for the ride" action thriller.

I'm also reading The Player of Games, my second Banks..."
I LOVE that book. Most of the things that happen in it have a direct bearing on why the protagonist gets involved in what he does and his subsequent action. Too, it's a really interesting attempt at bringing the interior life of someone who's obsessive about a thing (games, of course) out to the reader.
But it also does something Hamilton does not. It tells a complete story in 416 pages. Not 1800.
If Hamilton occasionally wrote doorstoppers, whatever. But they're pretty much ALL super long and it's just a style that doesnt sit with me. But I'll read the comments of everyone with interest. Pretty much the last comment I'll make though, since I'm skipping the book.


This is possibly the best way to read this book - it is SO slow to start that it would be very easy to switch to something easier to get into. If you can stick at it though, there is a point where all the strands start reaching critical mass and then BAM! You suddenly have a riveting action packed epic made all the more breathtaking by the vast amount of worldbuilding and foreshadowing you've just waded through.

What William said. Plus you know, PFH actually writes quite skillfully.
I went ahead and read PS shortly after Tom announced it. I am glad I did. I recommend that everyone who plans to read it get started on PS as soon as possible.
I have now started Judas Unchained (about 10% in). (The story continues. Trust me, you won't want to stop with PS.)




I'm skipping this since I've read a couple of his books (Judas Unchained, The Dreaming Void) and simply don't care for the overly detailed"
Your skipping Pandora's Star' because you've read 'Judas Unchained'? Forgive me but that makes no sense at all.

A) EDIT: I was an idiot and typed Judas Unchained when I meant Reality Dysfunction. No, I don't know why...
Rick wrote: "AndrewP wrote: "Your skipping Pandora's Star' because you've read 'Judas Unchained'? Forgive me but that makes no sense at all...."
A) I don't need your approval. "
Andrew isn't questioning your right to choose what to read, what he, and I also find strange is that you've read the sequel to "Pandora's Star" without reading "Pandora's Star". That is unusual, particularly when Pandora's Star and Judas Unchained are really one story split into 2 books.
"Judas Unchained" wouldn't make sense without the set-up and character progression that happens in "Pandora's Star"
A) I don't need your approval. "
Andrew isn't questioning your right to choose what to read, what he, and I also find strange is that you've read the sequel to "Pandora's Star" without reading "Pandora's Star". That is unusual, particularly when Pandora's Star and Judas Unchained are really one story split into 2 books.
"Judas Unchained" wouldn't make sense without the set-up and character progression that happens in "Pandora's Star"


A) I don't need your approval. "
Andrew isn't ques..."
/headdesk. Reality Dysfunction. Not Judas Unchained. I have no idea what I was thinking... :/


Okay, that makes perfect sense now. You tried the first book of two different trilogies and didn't like either of them. In your position, I too would be hesitant to start another 1,000 page epic.


A) EDIT: I was an idiot and typed Judas Unchained when I meant Reality Disfunction..."
I bounced hard off Reality Disfunction... Didn't make it past 100 pages. Then again in most normal books a lot happens in 100 pages..

I too liked the Night’s Dawn Trilogy quite a bit and the same with everything else Hamilton has written though I’d probably say I’d put PS/JU at the top followed by The Night’s Dawn. I do love all of his books quite a bit though. My favorite sci-fi author by a long shot.

Skimmed most of the long-winded world-building parts that went on and on for dozens of pages.
The story was interesting, but needlessly long.
I'll probably post more once we get a spoiler thread going.

I felt cheated by the ending, but maybe it just wasn’t my cup of tea.

.."
NOTE that this is the first of a duology and if you want the full story you get another 900 pages! Lucky you!!! (/s)

In terms of reading the next book, I'll leave judgement till I've finished PS.


What Richard said.


I’m finding each scene engaging enough as I read it (I liked the glider sequence!) but I’m not really feeling compelled to keep reading when I finish each chapter. I’m going to keep reading in anticipation of it all coming together in the end!

I’m finding each scene enga..."
It does pull together (all of Chekov's arsenal is used by the end)...
I am 25 hours into Judas Unchained (you will need to rad it to get closure) and it is mostly tying together.

Is this an anomaly or does he have other ouchies?


Hey, at least I gave it a try!

While I've reached some pretty darn gripping stuff (I'm at 42%), I seriously don't blame you for dropping it.
I gave up on Hamilton's Great North Road at around page 500 despite people telling me it turns into an absolute classic, I decided that no payoff was worth such a slog.
I've got to say Pandora's Star really is hypercharged rocket fuel once it finally gets going, but on this reread there were points when I nearly gave up even knowing how good it gets.
I'm loving it now though, and I know I've only just reached Level 1 payoff - it ramps up way more as it carries on.

I had to re-read my review of this book but it seems it was very slow to me as well until the halfway mark then it picked up immensely.

Books mentioned in this topic
Mindstar Rising (other topics)Light Chaser (other topics)
Great North Road (other topics)
Judas Unchained (other topics)
The Player of Games (other topics)
More...
Did anyone else have problems to get into the book? And for those who are farther along: Does it pick up speed?