EVERYONE Has Read This but Me - The Catch-Up Book Club discussion
LONG READS
>
Middlemarch - Read-A-Long
date
newest »





I'm really enjoying the expressive language. Although it's chunky and needs time to digest (so many extra words it seems), there is something satisfying about letting sentences sit.
I find myself chuckling, for example:
"Women were expected to have weak opinions; but the great safeguard of society and of domestic life was that opinions were not acted upon. Sane people did what their neighbours did, so that if any lunatics were at large, one might know and avoid them." page 6What are some of your thoughts about Dorothea, or at least at how she is being presented here?
"Dorothea, with all her eagerness to know the truths of life, retained very childlike ideas about marriage." page 6

I'll be diving into this one too. It certainly is "wordy". I have a library book now, but have been scouring the thrift shops for a used version to keep. Looking forward to the discussion!


What are people's thoughts about Mr Casaubon, especially as how he is presented in the first chapters?
"My mind is something like the ghost of an ancient, wandering about the world and trying mentally to construct it as it used to be, in spine of ruin and confusing changes." page 15I find Miss Brooke's fascination with him quite understanding - he's like the melancholic professor we all look up to. But to marry such a person?
"He was all she had at first imagined him to be: almost everything he had said seemed like a specimen from a mine, or the inscription on the door of a museum which might open treasures of past ages..." page 32

Andi wrote: “I am not a fan of Mr. Casaubon, he seems aloof and cold. Not sure why she married him, maybe she didn’t see this at first or maybe that was the times.”
Seemed to me that she was looking for other things (intellectual prestige, a sense of importance, etc.), and his aloofness didn’t matter much to her. If anything, she seems to take it as a sign that he is the things she’s hoping for—intellectual, important. (Like the quote Betsy posted above, comparing him to the inscription above a museum entrance.) The fact that he can’t be bothered with mere mortals even elevates him in her eyes.
It’s hard to believe she’ll end up happy in that marriage.
Seemed to me that she was looking for other things (intellectual prestige, a sense of importance, etc.), and his aloofness didn’t matter much to her. If anything, she seems to take it as a sign that he is the things she’s hoping for—intellectual, important. (Like the quote Betsy posted above, comparing him to the inscription above a museum entrance.) The fact that he can’t be bothered with mere mortals even elevates him in her eyes.
It’s hard to believe she’ll end up happy in that marriage.

It’s hard to believe she’ll end up happy in that marriage."
This is a great explanation and I agree. I'm worried that he isn't all she imagined him to be...she might have been imagining too much when it comes to him.



It means to first show gratitude when you've received a gift instead of immediately inspecting the gift to see if it is good enough for you.

Thank you :)

What do you think?
I am not sure that I like any of the character for now. I feel that Dorothea is a bit pretentious and I am happy to see that her sister is more open with her own opinions. It will be interesting to see how Dorothea marriage with Casaubon will work? What is best: a marriage for money, for love or because you are looking for a father figure?

I definitely don't know what makes some marriages work and others fail, but it doesn't seem right to marry for any one of these options.

Also, as to horses, you inspect their teeth to estimate their age, as teeth wear down through their life. So looking into their mouth is a way to judge the value of the horse.


- November, Book Three 'Waiting for Death', Chapter 28 -
This quote stood out to me:
"When would the days begin of that active wifely devotion which was to strengthen her husband's life and exalt her own?"(p.300)
At once sarcastic, almost satirical, and slicing like a knife at the truth of a failed set of expectations. Did you see this coming?
What do you all think about how Lydgate and Dorothea meet?
"For years after Lydgate remembered the impression produced in him by this voluntary appeal - this cry from soul to soul, without other consciousness than their moving with kindred natures in the same embroiled medium, the same troublous fitfully-illuminated life."(Chapter 30, p.318)




Betsy wrote: “This quote stood out to me:
At once sarcastic, almost satirical, and slicing like a knife at the truth of a failed set of expectations. Did you see this coming?”
That one jumped out at me as well. It strikes me as one of those really poignant mental shifts—where you say (or think) something that seems snarky in the moment, but that moment begins your transition to realizing the truth behind what you’re saying/thinking. As you say, it slices like a knife through the obstructions to your perception. I could tell by that passage that Dorothea was coming to seeing the reality of her situation, even as she herself might have been feeling guilty about such a sarcastic notion.
‘When would the days begin of that active wifely devotion which was to strengthen her husband’s life and exalt her own?’(p.300)
At once sarcastic, almost satirical, and slicing like a knife at the truth of a failed set of expectations. Did you see this coming?”
That one jumped out at me as well. It strikes me as one of those really poignant mental shifts—where you say (or think) something that seems snarky in the moment, but that moment begins your transition to realizing the truth behind what you’re saying/thinking. As you say, it slices like a knife through the obstructions to your perception. I could tell by that passage that Dorothea was coming to seeing the reality of her situation, even as she herself might have been feeling guilty about such a sarcastic notion.

At once sarcastic, almost sa..."
I agree about the frequently cutting tone of the author's comments! In fact that's probably the thing I'm ejoying most about this book: her view of both the society of the time and the behavior of the characters.

Judy wrote: “In fact that’s probably the thing I’m ejoying most about this book: her view of both the society of the time and the behavior of the characters.”
I agree. It’s the way people describe Jane Austen’s writing about her society, though I’ve never found Austen’s wit to be anywhere near this interesting or insightful. Austen’s narrators always struck me as the kind of people who run everyone down once their back is turned—it seems to be what she’s doing to her own characters. But Eliot is more authentically engaging with her characters’ motivations and inner lives. When some skepticism & irony sneak into the narrative, it seems well earned.
I agree. It’s the way people describe Jane Austen’s writing about her society, though I’ve never found Austen’s wit to be anywhere near this interesting or insightful. Austen’s narrators always struck me as the kind of people who run everyone down once their back is turned—it seems to be what she’s doing to her own characters. But Eliot is more authentically engaging with her characters’ motivations and inner lives. When some skepticism & irony sneak into the narrative, it seems well earned.


Don't worry, it's not very spoiled heavy! And welcome!


… but to most mortals there is a stupidity which is unendurable and a stupidity which is altogether acceptable - else, indeed, what would become of social bonds?
… this power of generalising which gives men so much the superiority in mistake over the dumb animals …
Also, the book has some very satisfying pay-offs, and I think it will have a hard time topping the huge pay-off of the scene between Dorothea and Ladislaw in the closing pages of Book 6:
"As if I were not in danger of forgetting everything else."
I predict that's a scene I will come back to long after I'm done the book.

I said oh Will, outloud when he said this. This book seemed filled with so much more information. And you saw how dignity and honor was so important for some characters, Will in particular, that it became a hurdle for the people of Middlemarch. I appreciated that Mr. Bulstrode brought Will in to tell him the truth but him continually saying “not a legal claim” showed his true colors.

I agree with you Wobbley, some sections are more engaging than others. I worry that my lack of attention span is also affecting my enjoyment.
Kyra, I like how you picked up on the aspect and importance of certain qualities for some characters. Do you relate to any of them in particular?
aPriL does feral sometimes wrote: "The novel reminds of Anthony Trollope’s books! I am enjoying this read."
I've been wanting to read something by Trollope, so I find that encouraging. I really loved Middlemarch.
I've been wanting to read something by Trollope, so I find that encouraging. I really loved Middlemarch.

I've been wanting to read something by Trollope, so I find that encouraging. I really lo..."
I am reading Middlemarch for the second time and love it as much as I did the first time! I have never read anything by Trollope and have a few of his books on my TBR list. :)




https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/how-mi...
There are 8 sections to the book, and we will aim to follow this schedule:
September: Book One 'Miss Brooke' and Book Two 'Old and Young'
October: Book Three 'Waiting For Death'
November: Book Four 'Three Love Problems'
December: Book Five 'The Dead Hand'
January: Book Six 'The Widow and the Wife'
February: Book Seven 'Two Temptations' and Eight 'Sunset and Sunrise'
At the start of each month, I will continue the discussion by asking questions and posing comments on the section we'll be reading, culminating in a live video discussion at the end of February.
Happy reading!