Tournament of Books discussion

70 views
2023 TOB General > 2023 ToB Rounds - Quarterfinals round 2, Mar 22

Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Phyllis (last edited Mar 14, 2023 09:56PM) (new)

Phyllis | 785 comments Space to discuss the Quarterfinals round 2, Mar 22:
Notes on Your Sudden Disappearance vs. Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow


message 2: by Kip (new)

Kip Kyburz (kybrz) | 541 comments https://www.tournamentofbooks.com/202...

Let there be much gnashing of teeth.


message 3: by Kip (new)

Kip Kyburz (kybrz) | 541 comments About the result, I think the judgment is very, very well done.


message 4: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth Arnold | 1314 comments Kip wrote: "https://www.tournamentofbooks.com/202...

Let there be much gnashing of teeth."


Completely understand the reasoning. And it's back as a Zombie (was that ever in doubt?) so people shouldn't completely destroy their teeth. I'm guessing Babel and Tomorrow will stay till the end, unless somehow Sea of Tranquility gets killed.


message 5: by Kyle (new)

Kyle | 898 comments Somehow I'm not surprised that the books that have broad appeal, huge sales, and high GR ratings are the ones being eliminated for smaller fare.


message 6: by Lark (last edited Mar 22, 2023 09:13AM) (new)

Lark Benobi (larkbenobi) | 197 comments No teeth gnashing, it was the Marx chapter alone that lifted this book for me from “good-but-flawed” to “flawed but great” and it’s very easy to imagine other more demanding readers thinking it wasn’t enough to overcome the less than perfect parts. But honestly it was hard to relate to a judge that found TTT dauntingly long. It’s the definition of a breezy book.


message 7: by Kip (new)

Kip Kyburz (kybrz) | 541 comments Lark wrote: "... But honestly it was hard to relate to a judge that found TTT dauntingly long. It’s the definition of a breezy book."

Indeed! His book could be fully enjoyed in about 2 hours though so by those standards just about any book could be judged long.

As you noted, it is long but not at all daunting.

And fully agree on the Marx chapter, it is what truly elevated this book to the highest of highs.


message 8: by Lark (last edited Mar 23, 2023 05:50PM) (new)

Lark Benobi (larkbenobi) | 197 comments Also actually the other great-to-me part was the title and how at some point the author relates the Shakespeare soliloquy to the way you die many times in video games but never really die. I thought it was great. It’s a perfect title in that everyone knows the quote even if they know nothing about Shakespeare and have never seen a play. It’s part of popular culture now. Vs Faulkner naming his novel “The Sound and the Fury” quoting from the same play, and meaning in every hubristic way possible to signal: “yes, I’m comparing myself with Shakespeare, to hell with anyone who thinks my novel isn't as important.”

So I thought the judge’s criticism of the title was off and it may have colored the whole read.


message 9: by Tina (new)

Tina Shackleford | 23 comments [gnash, gnash, gnash]


message 10: by Jan (new)

Jan (janrowell) | 1264 comments Yeah, I'm gnashing, because not only was Notes on Your Sudden Disappearance one of my least favorite books this year, but now my favorite and zombie pick, Mercury Pictures Presents, goes down too. Insert sad/grumpy face here.


message 11: by Phyllis (new)

Phyllis | 785 comments Jan wrote: "...but now my favorite and zombie pick, Mercury Pictures Presents, goes down too...."

I also really liked Mercury Pictures Presents. Very sad it is out of the running.


message 12: by Kyle (new)

Kyle | 898 comments Don't worry, we'll give it a prize in this group in 2025 or so.


message 13: by Gwendolyn (new)

Gwendolyn | 306 comments Kyle wrote: "Don't worry, we'll give it a prize in this group in 2025 or so."

Haha! Comment of the day!


back to top