Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion

This topic is about
The Portrait of a Lady
1001 Monthly Group Read
>
May (2023 Discussion) – The Portrait of a Lady by Henry James
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Karen
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
May 15, 2023 04:59PM

reply
|
flag


They also just touch on similar themes, like the focus on Christian morality and how that is closely tied up with what’s proper, and the inherent violence towards women implied by the restrictions that have been set on them. Anyways I’ll try to post again when I’m finished, congrats on working through though as it’s definitely a challenging read!

Okay, so I finished it! I thought it was amazing. So many thoughts lol.
1) Osmond. What a creepy villain. I love how (at least for me) he snuck up on us; even though his machinations are revealed at the very beginning, I was still surprised when the extent of his villainy was revealed at the end. He is going to stay with me for a while. If I was smarter I would explain the symbolism of him tracing out the antique coin, but I feel like it could represent so many different things - obsession with a cheap and incomplete copy of the past, maybe? Obsession with worldly things? Inability to create anything of his own, even in private, for himself?
@LDB - I believe Isabel when she says that he loved her, but that he never would have married her if not for her money. At least, I think he loved her as much as he was ever going to love anybody, and as mostly a reflection of himself. But like, even if he never loved her, or even if he loved her more than himself, it doesn't really matter because he needs to feel like he controls every woman in his life.
2) Pansy. I love that James gave her a brain. I feel like 90% of the time she would have just been a vapid pretty girl, but she is revealed to have the most depth of anyone in her family. I grew to like her and I feel like I kind of identify with what James might have been trying to express in her - the appeal of complete submission, the sacrifices that some people might make to achieve it. She was still probably the least believable character for me as she's portrayed in the book, however I think if you read her as seen through Isabel's eyes, as an example of what Isabel is trying so desperately to emulate, to become the type of person who could honor her vows and stay with Gilbert, she perhaps makes a little more sense - and that REALLY feels believable, that one woman would kind of exaggerate the submissive "feminine" qualities in another when she is feeling pressured to perform a version of submissive femininity that feels so foreign and unnatural to her.
3) All the women. One way I've been thinking about this book is how it shows how difficult it is to be a woman in a repressed patriarchal society. How about Mrs. Touchett? Or Countess Gemini? And especially Madame Merle, oof. Like had Madame Merle been a man she would have been president by now. But what is she supposed to do with all that capability as a woman, except hope that she can attach her ambition to the right man? Even Henrietta Stackpole has to sacrifice her freedom as an unmarried woman to penetrate Britain's inner life, although she gives up the least by far of any of them.
4) Death. I like reading old books because I feel like people back then were more comfortable with mortality. I feel like it really puts our present attitudes into perspective. Like I never feel more convinced after reading an author like James that now more than ever before, we are a society that considers it immoral to be unhealthy and that death is a scary thing that shouldn't be touched. I dunno. Like, modern medicine promises an explanation for everything, and of course we've made incredible strides and I'd hate to have been alive back then, but I still feel like we've lost something. And maybe this is just me. But I feel like Isabel spent more time worrying about how to a good person, than about whether she was eating the correct amount of fiber. And that I think is a better way to live. What would Henrietta Stackpole say to that? I have no idea.
5) Ambiguity. My grandma doesn't like Henry James because she says she never knows what he's talking about and people are always dying of unspecified diseases. lol. I get it. Like what in the world did James mean when he said (when Ralph was in Rome and he was explaining why Osmond hated him) that Ralph represented personal freedom? What did Ralph do, up to that point, that Isabel was aware of (so not leaving her the money) that indicated that he was so pro-freedom? A lot of the parts with Ralph I felt like I was too modern and ignorant of whatever people were talking about back then to understand. And I was honestly surprised when Isabel said he was her best friend. Like does Henrietta Stackpole mean nothing to you?!
This is probably my #1 book I would love to sit down with an expert and just take it section by section and have someone give me the context, because for so many off-hand comments I had to just say 'yep, okay' and move on without understanding them more deeply than as supporting detail for a broader point James was trying to make.


The impression that has been left me from this book, a month or so after having read it, is of Isabel as a martyr, sticking with her bad decision even when there were opportunities to leave that life behind and follow other roads. While I understand wanting to take responsibility for our bad decisions, I tend to be a bit impatient with martyrs. But that is just me.