2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

During the reception Nick hosted for Julian Sinclair, the nominee for the US Supreme Court, he goaded Sam into sharing her views regarding Roe vs. Wade. When she did, it was provocative. Was she out of line given Nick was hosting or was her point of view delivered respectfully and honestly? What else could she have done? Was she wrong to have left the party?

She delivered her dissenting opinion with grace and honesty. Nick was an ass for making her feel disrespected just because she felt the way she did.

Sam is entitled to her opinion and she was neither rude nor ungracious in expressing it. It's another situation in which Nick and Sam must learn that being part of a couple requires openness and trust. Her leaving the party was immature. Adults have conversations; they don't run away.

I agree. Sam has the right to her opinion. I can see any woman who knows that she can't have any children, being a little conservative on the topic. However, like Lauren, I see her actions at leaving the party and asking Nick to tell their guest that she has to go to work, is very immature.

She shared her view of Roe vs. Wade. She wasn't rude to their guest. Nick shouldn't have been mad. She's allowed her opinion.

Agree - she shouldn't have left the party.