Nature Literature discussion

This topic is about
H is for Hawk
Book of the Month
>
H is for Hawk discussion
message 1:
by
Becky
(new)
Apr 01, 2015 05:35PM

reply
|
flag

Hello- I am curious if anyone comes to this book with any experience or exposure to falconry, and I am also curious if anyone comes to reading as a fan of T.H. White's books?
Sher
Sher

Hi Ray:
I asked , because we had a falconer visit us once when we were living in Alaska, and he had a gyrfalcon and other raptors. He was a registered falconer, and he told us that the raptors are wild and have little to no relationship with their keepers. He said if you want a relationship with a bird work with a crow, a raven, or a parrot. It sounded like a difficult and time consuming "hobby." But, I did not get a clear idea of why he was into falconry if it wasn't the relationship with the bird. The author seems to have a connection with her bird, so that is why I asked if anyone else here might have some insight. How far are you into the book now?
I read it last fall, and what captivated me the most was her powers of description. At times I felt like everything else in my life faded away, and I was with her in those woods with the bird. I struggled with aspects of the overall content of the book, but I found her powers of telling the story when she was with the bird utterly captivating. Yet, I was not drawn to the author as a person or personality. The impression I had of her wasn't very favorable, but I have since read accounts from people who know her and find her charming and real. So, ..... My impressions are just that, I guess.
I asked , because we had a falconer visit us once when we were living in Alaska, and he had a gyrfalcon and other raptors. He was a registered falconer, and he told us that the raptors are wild and have little to no relationship with their keepers. He said if you want a relationship with a bird work with a crow, a raven, or a parrot. It sounded like a difficult and time consuming "hobby." But, I did not get a clear idea of why he was into falconry if it wasn't the relationship with the bird. The author seems to have a connection with her bird, so that is why I asked if anyone else here might have some insight. How far are you into the book now?
I read it last fall, and what captivated me the most was her powers of description. At times I felt like everything else in my life faded away, and I was with her in those woods with the bird. I struggled with aspects of the overall content of the book, but I found her powers of telling the story when she was with the bird utterly captivating. Yet, I was not drawn to the author as a person or personality. The impression I had of her wasn't very favorable, but I have since read accounts from people who know her and find her charming and real. So, ..... My impressions are just that, I guess.
Just reading the comments on one of the review sites where you can purchase the book, I've learned something I never knew about falconers. I thought falconers bought these birds, trained them and kept them forever but it appears a lot of them actually release these birds into the wild when they're mature enough to hunt for themselves. It's actually a form of conservationism because a lot of raptors in modern civilization don't make it to adulthood without help now. It's too dangerous / difficult for them to hunt as fledglings so falconers provide that "protection" while they're learning the ropes.

P.S. I'm enjoying the book so far, which I'm also reading with one of my two boys.
That is interesting Becky. Thanks for sharing. A twist and far cry from White's goals and from what I thought about falconry. Things change.


Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to your question.
Generally, I worked with non releasable birds, injured by collisions with vehicles, power lines, etc. Some were seized from people who had them illegally, i.e. without permits. A few of these were imprinted on humans, meaning they had some much contact with humans at a young age that they responded to them as birds would to another bird. I noticed that some birds seemed to develop a bond with particular handlers.
Hello Ray-- thanks for replying back. That is interesting about some of the birds seeming to develop a bond with particular handlers. I wonder what makes the difference. I have performance flying pigeons, and these birds are taken by raptors. But, certain pigeons have "personalities" that stand out from the rest of the birds, and some birds are more tame and easy to handle; whereas, other lines are very flighty and more difficult to approach. I have a mild to moderate concern with raptors here, so the pigeons that are not as tamable (genetically) I do not try to tame. I have kept pigeons for 11 years, and I have found the birds that are less tame survive flying in the outdoors longer.

"Before working with these birds I learned that the force in their talons [eagles] exceeds 1,200 pounds per square inch."
Wow! That is incredible.
Why are imprinted birds the most dangerous? Is it because they don't fear the handler as much as a truly wild bird? Is it related to food - mate? What is your understanding of this? I'm curious.
Wow! That is incredible.
Why are imprinted birds the most dangerous? Is it because they don't fear the handler as much as a truly wild bird? Is it related to food - mate? What is your understanding of this? I'm curious.

If you look at the web site of the International Crane Foundation, you may see a photo of a person in an all white costume that covers the whole body and disguises all human characteristics. This person is preparing to enter an enclosure with captive born cranes being prepared for release into the wild. This group has brought the wild whooping cranes back from a population of less than 25 to current numbers of about 600.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
Hi Ray-- Thanks for the link for the book and the International Crane Foundation information. I did not know about the Crane Foundation; it was interesting to explore their site. We have sandhilll cranes within a few hours of where I live in Oregon, and I was also able to see cranes in very wild environs in Alaska. I have never seen a whooping crane. Great work these folks are doing.
I will see if I can get that book on hawks through my library.
I will see if I can get that book on hawks through my library.


Sher wrote: "Hi Ray-- Thanks for the link for the book and the International Crane Foundation information. I did not know about the Crane Foundation; it was interesting to explore their site. We have sandhilll ..."
Ray- I know we are sort off topic-- but I just wanted to note how fortunate you are to have the chance to see so many of these cranes . That's incredible. At Malheur where we go, we are lucky to see 20 - 30, and this is quite an event, so thousands sounds astonishing. Thanks for the link on birds....too. Best, Sher
Ray- I know we are sort off topic-- but I just wanted to note how fortunate you are to have the chance to see so many of these cranes . That's incredible. At Malheur where we go, we are lucky to see 20 - 30, and this is quite an event, so thousands sounds astonishing. Thanks for the link on birds....too. Best, Sher



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y4rH...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA64m...

Great idea Antonia. I forget we have the Web and all its resources to make our readings even more interesting. The first link opened fine for me.
What struck me most about the video was how the falconers never looked into the eyes of any of their birds. The first man was holding his bird so close to his face. He never looked at the bird though. I guess looking into the bird's eyes would be considered threatening. Like being invisible to the bird as Macdonald put it and Ray reminded us.
Also, I recall Macdonald mentioning when Mabel would jump off her arm- I think that might have been called bateing? (it's been 8 months since I read the book), and we get to see several of the goshawks do this in the video.
The goshawk replaces the gun and also replaces the dog's retrieve. The dog just points the game, but doesn't retrieve.
What struck me most about the video was how the falconers never looked into the eyes of any of their birds. The first man was holding his bird so close to his face. He never looked at the bird though. I guess looking into the bird's eyes would be considered threatening. Like being invisible to the bird as Macdonald put it and Ray reminded us.
Also, I recall Macdonald mentioning when Mabel would jump off her arm- I think that might have been called bateing? (it's been 8 months since I read the book), and we get to see several of the goshawks do this in the video.
The goshawk replaces the gun and also replaces the dog's retrieve. The dog just points the game, but doesn't retrieve.


See them here:
https://www.pineofalconry.com/hood-ga...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6QUl...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsRZi...
Above is a short interview (Samuel Johnson Prize) of Macdonald speaking of her work. I enjoyed hearing her speak and talk about her experiences. On the right hand of the page you will see other more indepth interviews- including one with the New York Times.
Above is a short interview (Samuel Johnson Prize) of Macdonald speaking of her work. I enjoyed hearing her speak and talk about her experiences. On the right hand of the page you will see other more indepth interviews- including one with the New York Times.


Ray wrote: "The video on Pheasant hunting in Ireland was incredible. Notice how the bird spreads its wings and tail to cover its kill. This is called Manteling. http://birding.about.com/od/birdinggl......"
Ray: Yes, I loved watching those videos; also the one in Scotland, but I only saw one Gos that didn't absolutely mutilate the pheasant's breast. I'm not sure which video it was, but the Gos just stepped aside quietly and did not eat the pheasant. A friend of mine said -- those birds can be trained not to eat the kill. Pretty brutal to watch indeed when the Gos was just ripping out the breast of the pheasant.
Beth: Yes, I agree. I think birds of prey should be wild and flying free; but I do admire the cultural aspects of flying and hunting with raptors, especially if there is a scarcity of hunting weapons, or horses to chase prey and you need food to eat. I am only in the middle of the book, haven't quite determined why, if you are grieving, you'd want to witness such a dark process like the end of life and the brutality of a Gos in killing its prey. I think if I were grieving, I'd try some hobby which would allow me to go to a lighter cheerier place.


I am about 1/3 of the way through the book now. I lost my father much the same way that the author did, to a sudden an unexpected heart attack. The T.H. White portions of the book have not pushed their way into the forefront of my reading as much as the "subplot" of her father's sudden death and how she turned to the goshawk in the aftermath of her loss.
I still think that it would be wonderful to be able to change into an animal or bird.


I noticed that Canadian author Guy Gavriel Kay is promoting H is for Hawk as one of his "Authors4Indies" books at an event in Toronto today, so I "tweeted" him that we had just finished reading it.
His response:
Terrific book. There's a VG i'view with her in LARB by Cdn novelist @cfischerguy this week. Try Vaillaint's The Tiger, too. The Tiger: A True Story of Vengeance and Survival
Here's the link to the interview with Guy, in case you're interested: http://lareviewofbooks.org/interview/...
His response:
Terrific book. There's a VG i'view with her in LARB by Cdn novelist @cfischerguy this week. Try Vaillaint's The Tiger, too. The Tiger: A True Story of Vengeance and Survival
Here's the link to the interview with Guy, in case you're interested: http://lareviewofbooks.org/interview/...

Antonia wrote: "TH White and Helen--both sought happiness through the hawk and the answers as to why they were both miserable. Finally at "magical Places" she is starting to find the happy child she once was...TH ..."
Antonia: Well expressed. My favorite parts of the book were the descriptions of the time spent with Mabel the hawk. During these moments I was transported, but I found the author difficult to like. I had trouble mustering the level of empathy I should have had for her loss. Still, I feel badly even writing that, because of course, I don't know Macdonald on a personal level. We garner impressions about an author through their work, but I often think our impressions may stand outside of who these authors are. (When I watched an interview of Macdonald, my impression of her was quite different and it was positive) It is so easy to react and say I did not feel her pain. But, you are correct, I believe she used White's story as a way to tell her story. I can see the academic very much at work. I mean I can very much see the writer is an academic. I think H is for Hawk is also very much a creative work. Yes, her prose and the ability to transport the reader is astonishing!
Antonia: Well expressed. My favorite parts of the book were the descriptions of the time spent with Mabel the hawk. During these moments I was transported, but I found the author difficult to like. I had trouble mustering the level of empathy I should have had for her loss. Still, I feel badly even writing that, because of course, I don't know Macdonald on a personal level. We garner impressions about an author through their work, but I often think our impressions may stand outside of who these authors are. (When I watched an interview of Macdonald, my impression of her was quite different and it was positive) It is so easy to react and say I did not feel her pain. But, you are correct, I believe she used White's story as a way to tell her story. I can see the academic very much at work. I mean I can very much see the writer is an academic. I think H is for Hawk is also very much a creative work. Yes, her prose and the ability to transport the reader is astonishing!
