The Obscure Reading Group discussion
The Stone Raft
>
The Stone Raft Week One Discussion
date
newest »


Just a note - I read on a Kindle version of 294 pages. Hopefully your copies are close to that length, but if I reference a scene on a page you can't find, lmk and I'll try to better locate it for you. Same for anyone else, okay?
One of the first things that strikes me about the story is Saramago's constant reference to geography, and I would like to keep it as a theme or topic throughout our discussion. Share what you will about this aspect of the story.
The build-up to understand what is happening to the Iberian peninsula happens while we are being introduced to all the main characters, whether we realize it or not. How do you feel about the magical realism of the break or about the weirdnesses (we could call them "superpowers" maybe?) the individual characters each experience? Do you find them metaphorical or meaningful in any way?
The final break of Iberia from the continent happens on page 26, very early in the story. What do you think Saramago means by posting this as the action driver for the story? Amusing, ironic, metaphoric, something else?
We can have discussions about each of the characters and their superpowers.
Looking forward to this discussion!


So that made me think that maybe the separation of the Iberian peninsula was perhaps a bitterly ironic symbol of his own separation!

Fergus, what prize was retracted and for which book? I never heard anything like that about the author.

Nidhi, I hadn't thought of the starlings as a signal of ecological imbalance, that's interesting. There are different reference on what Saramago was thinking, for instance, they are "a winged festivity," they form "a huge dark cloud, like a prelude to a storm" so they are sort of ominous, which is a bit reinforced when he mentions the Hitchcock classic. But then on the more lighthearted side, there's a discussion that starlings are "used for frivolous and giddy people who don't reflect on their actions." Did you find any references for a more somber meaning re ecological imbalance?
But what do you think the starlings actually mean as Jose Anaico's "superpower"?



If we think about it as a "road story," it helps think of the journey as part of the plot - where they go, what they see, what they talk about, rather than lots of action. As some travelers they meet on the road tell them -- "We're on our way to see the world" (though their world is much smaller now, seeing it is more feasible).
What's happening on the radio and the incompetent shenanigans of the government provide some comic relief. Even so called experts, such as the North American scientist who declared "the peninsula cannot possibly be moving, got the muttered Galilean response from an Italian expert Eppur si muove.
Regarding the Dog, who has various names but internally recalls being "Ardent," I'm sure he's significant. The first to recognize the crack in Cerbere (the eastern side of the Pyrenees, then traveling to the western side where he met up with Maria Guavaira and took her Blue Thread, he sets the thread like Ariadne that will lead us through the labyrinth. It's through his agency that once the three men and Joana Carda meet, they travel to Galicia and Maria G to find their fates.

I'll try to pin down that reference later this afternoon, but just to say it smacked to me of a blind spot in the author's rear view mirror which resulted in a fit of childish petulance.
So my admiration for his novel Blindness - a masterpiece - became tarnished. I'd just love to discover I was wrong!



Great point, Cindy. So then the "millions" of Europeans chanting "We are Iberians too" is particularly hilarious.


Sherri, I agree, Saramago and his translator are hella-good writers! The imagery is so clear and tangible.


Fergus, Blindness floored me, and terrified me. When people ask for scary book recs, that's the title I give because of how quickly and shockingly society fell apart. Saramago didn't make it seem implausible how fragile civil society is.


Cherisa, I don't think I'm as far into my reading as many are. I haven't gotten to some of the places you've mentioned. I was thinking that the reactions to the peninsula breaking off from Europe was a metaphor for people's fears. If they join the EU, what will happen to their fortunes vs. if they are the only countries that don't join the EU, what will happen then? While this may have started out as a satire about the controversy, I think it turned into so much more. He covers governmental bureaucracy, politics, scientists, human nature, community vs. individuals, the epic journey, sly references to Don Quixote, and the list goes on. I thought I even saw a reference to Fernando Pessoa.
Regarding the Don Quixote reference: The Deux Chevaux (roughly translated as two horses) reminds me of Rocinante. Temperamental. It may or may not get you to where you are going. Like Rocinante, Deux Chevaux is its own character.
I'm not sure what to think about the starlings. I do know that Eurodollars are quite colorful like starlings, the latter when viewed in the right light. Unlike Hitchcock's, "The Birds," the starlings are the injured party when they are shot at a checkpoint. They don't seem to be aggressive toward anyone other than frightening/astonishing people by their sheer numbers. Maybe I'll have formed another opinion when I get further along in my reading. I'm at page 90 so I'm not 1/2 done yet.
Personally, I'm really enjoying this novel, especially Saramago's subtle humor.

I love that you pulled out Cervantes and the old car, Cindy! Absolutely, Deux Chevaux rates as worthy of consideration as a character and part of the plot. Let's start with the fact that it's a French Citroen. Meta tells me it was produced from 1948-1990 and was "known for its compliant ride... and ability to transport heavy loads across difficult terrain." But then get this - it became an automotive icon and early models are highly sought after. "Rugged, useful, affordable."
The road trip wouldn't have been likely or possible without it, and Joaquim is the only one who owns a car, and therefor starts the whole trip when he first goes off in search of Pedro. It doesn't make him the Don, but in a sense his action "drives" the story, haha.




Just finished this and I’ve got to say I thoroughly enjoyed every bit of it. I am glad this group introduced me to the Stone Raft and Saramago.
The story telling is so rich, with subtle humor sprinkled throughout. The author used the tools of allusion and suggestion effectively; with a “wink and a nod.”
Everything; the migration and rotation of the “peninsula, the dog, the horses, the donkey, the human characters, and the geological issues, the romances, the simultaneous impregnation of all the women of Spain and Portugal, were all just unbelievable enough to keep one invested and interested. The writing style with atypical punctuation was a challenge at first, but allowed ( forced?) me to focus on what was being described or stated. All of this added to the richness of the book.
We were exposed to a lot of Iberian geography, so I reviewed maps of Spain and Portugal; a tour of the peninsula, which seemed to be quite purposeful by Saramago, he wanted us to know about his homeland.
There were, of course, musings about the human experience international politics and of course, a good deal of philosophizing.
Reading the group’s comments and thinking about this book I know there are a lot of subtleties and references which I likely under appreciate. However, I know enough to remain completely befuddled as to the process involved for someone (Saramago) to fold all these ingredients together and create what ends up being a wonderful piece of literature

For Week 1, starting Saturday, June 1st, we will discuss through page 161, or where the group arrives at Maria Guavaira's home in Galicia. This feels like a natural break and transition of action in the story.
Week 2, starting June 9th, will be a little shorter at 133 pages.
Thank you and looking forward to getting to talk with you all about this book!