Pakistani Readers discussion
Book of the Month
>
The Forty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak, Apr/15
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Faheem
(new)
Apr 11, 2015 11:06AM

reply
|
flag


It's quite intense, I read it slowly over a month I think. Will see what others have to say, I really wanted to give it 5 stars but it fell short of my expectations towards the last quarter. Will go into the reasons after others have read it.
My local bookstore doesn't have a copy. Sold out. They probably only had one copy to begin with. Had to borrow from the library. Now i'm under a deadline to read it... Don't like deadlines. But seeing all this praise, can't wait to read it. Really excited about this BOTM.

Yes its last quarter somewhat lost its effect but still it is captivating and has potential to alter the way of thinking.

My friend is doing her thesis on this book. I haven't started reading it but am going to now. This discussion is interesting.
Are we allowed to talk about a certain part of the book yet. Like the first 50 or 100 pages? Or the whole thing later?
Lara wrote: "Also gave it 4. I absolutely loved the beginning. It was enticing, poetic and unique. The symbolism about how a stone thrown in a river has no effect but one thrown in a lake has so much impact and..."
Agreed, the beginning was amazing. I started reading it yesterday.
@zenab, I don't think it should be an issue. Just mention some sort of reference in the beginning. like, if you haven't read till page 57, stop reading these posts instead go n read the book :)
btw i am on page 57.
Agreed, the beginning was amazing. I started reading it yesterday.
@zenab, I don't think it should be an issue. Just mention some sort of reference in the beginning. like, if you haven't read till page 57, stop reading these posts instead go n read the book :)
btw i am on page 57.
I'm about half way through and I think I'm not getting this book? Couple of things are bothering me.... The dialogue of the 13th century world is too modern for me, esp. when Rumi and Shams are talking. They sound like basic simpletons merely reciting what someone great has written. If the point is to read and understand their greatness, there are books that they've written, Better! But they are also the only interesting part of the book. I don't like going back to the Ella parts. So far I do not understand what she is doing or where she is headed. And why. The coincidence of her reading this book doesn't come off as divine but something contrived by the author... So far I do not like Aziz... No one who is actually on the mystic path calls himself a sufi... As far as I think someone who calls himself a sufi is being a little big headed. I don't know maybe it is just me. I remember reading something in college about a true sufi never labels himself a sufi. If one is trying to lose himself to be one with Him... then labeling oneself is counterproductive.... I'll read on and see if it gets better.
Oh another thing... This is a personal issue I guess. I took an Islamic Mysticism class in college and our professor was this amazing guy. He was Allama Iqbal obsessed. He visit universities all over the US to teach these classes. Any-who, he hated the word Blasphemy when applied to Islam. He thought the connotations and historic events have made this a very christian word. So in using it to refer to something in Islam, esp. when people use it in reference to the mystics was not proper. What Muslim thought as blasphemous was different from what christians thought and punished as blasphemous. I remember how while reading a book and coming across this word, he'd make it a point to bring this up. That was his opinion obviously... I just think of that everytime I read the word.

I hadn't read about sufiism, until this, but I have seen others who have, like you, and they were underwhelmed by the rumi/shams portrayal in comparison to other mystic writings.
Your professor was right in saying that blasphemy is a very misunderstood word, and I wish he could have given this teaching to so many out there who have killed for it without even knowing its meaning.
I found the writing of this book to be very poetic and I found peace within its pages.
I couldn't finish... Motivation wasn't there. But the 40 rules were amazing. I felt if I could incorporate even a few of them in my life, my life would be so much better and happier. If everyone else did also, the world would be a much better place, more tolerant. I also loved the incorporation of the critics of sufism in the book. Even though these people were from a time so long ago, it was so sad to realize that people like them exist in our supposedly civilized, modern and educated society. Plus now they have modern weapons and not just a stick....
Already Read It And Enjoyed It Alot <3



hey maira
I'd like to read her thesis! :)) send me da link ef you coulkd. thanks


Shams' treatment of Kimya is a direct contradiction of his rule #3, rule#4 and rule#15. I used to be a fan of mysticism but then I realized the folly of it: through denial of instincts, comes only dissatisfaction and unhappiness. A true Sufi, by that rationale, is most likely mentally disturbed - and they are, evidently.
Also, am I the only one who noticed that Desert Rose's brother was only 5 years old when he used to go outside home and learn all the 'bad habits' and later killed his parents at the SAME AGE?!


Sadly it was the only copy there.
I'll have to wait 'till it becomes available again.


Thanks but I can't stand reading books in PDF format. So unfortunately I'll have to wait.

hey..please tell me that your friend is doing research on this book in MA/MPHIL English or in any other language.