SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Shards of Earth
Group Reads Discussions 2024
>
"Shards of Earth" Discuss Everything *Spoilers*
date
newest »


The sheer scale of this series is what blew me away. I consider it to be cosmic horror-lite. The way that that Idris Telemmier and the rest of the intermediaries worked was an incredible idea.
My favorite character was Myrmidon Executor Solace and I owe that mostly to the author’s abilities to telegraph combat. It reminds me a lot of the current series I’m reading by Ryan Cahill’s Bound and the Broken fantasy series. They both write combat very similar. It’s not overly complicated, easier to follow, and still effective.
What happened to earth, being artwork, plays on the idea that there is some strange beauty in destruction. I might post more as I think back on that book. I’d rather stay in my lane and not give away spoilers from the other books in The Final Architecture series.

The sheer scale of th..."
I've only read the first and look forward to reading the rest of the series. Your comment about artwork and a strange beauty in destruction is intriguing and I hope you'll comment more on that later.

lots of deaths
love the Hivers
Idris, Kris, Solace and Ollie are some of my favorites with Kittering and Haever coming in just below them

I read Adrian’s Children of time and loved the evolutionary, scientific explanations. Not getting that in this book yet but hope I will. Only 100 pages into this book.

I like the diversity of characters, both the individuals and the different species, factions and cultures, in this universe. It's fun and imaginative and it keeps the novel from feeling heavy. I think Tchaikovsky did a really creative job at populating this universe and filling in all the important niches for a good, engaging story. It's quite an intriguing juxtaposition--this very vibrant cast of characters navigating and interacting in their known universe intertwined with a deeper story involving the Architects, the Originators, the intermediaries and unspace--and I am very impressed so far with how well Tchaikovsky pulls it off.

My main gripe is at times the story got a little bogged down with the interpersonal conflicts and fighting between factions but overall I felt the novel rewards the reader for getting through that stuff, with both its character and plot development, so it's not a big gripe on my part.
Idris is easily my favorite character. I love how layered he is, how the sense of his life experience feels deep and authentic, and that he has a strong moral character and principles rooted in the experience that force those around him to work with him and not simply strongarm him into doing what they want.
Also, as a disabled reader, I want to say that I think Tchaikovsky does a fairly good job with writing disabled characters. Idris, who I consider a disabled character, is written exceptionally well, and Olli is also good and very realistic. I think the writing for Olli gets a little heavy-handed but it's forgivable. Sometimes you need to be blunt. If you meet any of us angry disabled folks, you probably can see a bit of Olli in any one of us.


yep, the Shadows of the Apt series has all sorts of Insect Kinden.

The only thing that bothered me was that a number of times there were multiple close-call situations one after the other after the other. It was a little too much adrenalin for me, and also, it made it less believable to me that many of the main characters kept surviving. I wanted a bit more breathing room at times, but it didn't keep me from enjoying the book overall. I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the series.

The characters were ok, but I felt kinda like I was in a marvel movie, which I place in fantasy.
What I enjoyed about Children of Time so much was the abilities of the spiders were based on actual spider physiology, and the use of evolution to expand those abilities was fascinating.
While I enjoyed Shards of Earth in a few ways, it didn’t really do it for me like Children of Time did.

It was an action-adventure book that happened to be set in space. I liked it okay, but it was long and a struggle to finish. The ending was enough to explain things, but it wasn't satisfying, just a set-up for book two. Wah waah.
BTW, for those of you like me, that are not going to finish the series, the series's article on Wikipedia has a great summary of what happens to our heroes, the Architects, and the mystery of the Originators.


The ideas and concepts of unspace and creatures in the void are very well realised. My favourites were Solice initally but eventually Idris, I hope he gets some sleep that doesn't involve basically dying and then being resusitated soon.
No one told me this was Tchaikovsky's version of Mass Effect!
I've moaned elsewhere about such characteristics and comparisons being used but I would not have put off reading this series for so long if it were sold to me as that. The story that makes up the Mass Effect trilogy is what space opera writers should be aspiring to (imo).
Anyway, I'm glad Tchaikovsky wrote this. I didn't love it, but I'm still glad. The humour didn't work (for me), the whining occasionally grated, and at no point was I invested in the survival of the characters who for whatever reason failed to feel like actual people with complex desires and motivations.
That the defeat of the architects was wholly dependent on one person irked me, even though its more than common for our genre to do. I just wish one person saving the universe was more in the vein of Shepherd bringing people together than a head to head.
I immediately went on to read book two but it may be some time before I get around to actually finishing the trilogy.
I've moaned elsewhere about such characteristics and comparisons being used but I would not have put off reading this series for so long if it were sold to me as that. The story that makes up the Mass Effect trilogy is what space opera writers should be aspiring to (imo).
Anyway, I'm glad Tchaikovsky wrote this. I didn't love it, but I'm still glad. The humour didn't work (for me), the whining occasionally grated, and at no point was I invested in the survival of the characters who for whatever reason failed to feel like actual people with complex desires and motivations.
That the defeat of the architects was wholly dependent on one person irked me, even though its more than common for our genre to do. I just wish one person saving the universe was more in the vein of Shepherd bringing people together than a head to head.
I immediately went on to read book two but it may be some time before I get around to actually finishing the trilogy.

I've moaned elsewhere about such characteristics and comparisons being used but I would not have put off reading this series for so l..."
There are multiple "Mass Effect" books in goodreads. Who wrote it, Ryan?
Mass Effect is a computer game trilogy. There are spin-off books set in the universe and books that are meant as prequels for the games story but unfortunately there are no books that manage to encapsulate the greatness of the gaming trilogy.

Oh, duh on my part. Thanks 😀


I actually just finished ALIEN CLAY and I was somewhat disappointed. His creativity is off the charts but the book itself isn’t as enjoyable as some of his earlier work.

I'm waiting to be blown away by AT. I know Children of Time is supposed to be his best.... but... SPIDERS.....
1. What did you think of the world?
2. What did you think of the characters?
3. What worked or didn't for you?
4. Overall thoughts?
Non-spoiler thread here: First impressions