Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion

If you have a question that you want answered, but you're unsure where to ask, here's the place!

Need help with Goodreads features? Navigating our group? Reminders of how things work? Queries about book editions? Ask away! We will do our best to find answers for you.

Hi! I was just wondering what happened to all of the author sections? Like there used to be sections for Jane Austen and maybe Poe, several others (of course i cant think of them now). Did those sections get retired? I kinda liked that. Wondering where i can join conversation about those books that are not current reads of the yeR... or does the group get refreahed every year? Thanks!

The author sections were eliminated and the books were placed in the appropriate time slot...so the Austen books were moved to
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/group...

All threads remain open, so you can comment on any book that has been read either as a group or in a buddy read. The easiest way to find the book you are looking for is to go to the folder, click on the word "topics" at the far left and the books will be listed alphabetically.

Hope this was helpful, April. Happy reading.

𝙰𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚏𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚜! 𝙵𝚎𝚎𝚕 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚍𝚍 𝚖𝚎 💟
𝙸'𝚖 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝙽𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚗 𝙸𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚍, 𝚄𝙺. 𝙸 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚛𝚎𝚜, 𝚏𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚢, 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚛, 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎.

Question- how exactly does a book become a "classic"? Since the future classics challenge, i have been wondering what books actually classify as classics in the "new" category, or whatever is beyond that. How does Goodreads come to define its classics, because some are labelled and i think, some are not. ??
Thanks

Classics are defined differently in different contexts, April, but I think most people would agree that the classics are books that have endured over a long period of time, still have a readership, and/or contain themes that remain relevant. In this group, for reading purposes, we consider any book written before 2006 to qualify--a very low bar. In truth, not even every book written in antiquity is a classic, and you can no doubt find arguments all over GR and the internet at large over what constitutes a true "classic".

For the future classics challenge, you are just being asked to choose a book written after 2005 that you think people will still be reading in 2050. It is subjective, so you cannot pick the wrong book.

This is for Katy as I am unable to Message her. My question for Katy is:

Would you consider changing your reading schedule for The Forsyte Saga to clarify when the 2nd Interlude Awakening is to be read?

In the listed schedule for the upcoming The Forsyte Saga read the 2nd Interlude Awakening is listed after To Let. It should be read before To Let.


As Goodreads correctly shows, the order of the books in the Saga is:
#1 -- The Man of Property
#1.5 - Indian Summer of a Forsyte
#2 -- In Chancery
#2.5 -Awakening
#3 --To Let

There are books that combine the 2nd Interlude with either the previous or succeeding work in the Saga:
#2 and #2.5 - In Chancery and Awakening
#2.5 and #3 - Awakening & to Let

They do that with the 1st Interlude too:
#1 and #1.5 - The Man of Property and Indian Summer of a Forsyte
#1.5 and #2 - Indian Summer of a Forsyte & in Chancery

Brian E wrote: "This is for Katy as I am unable to Message her. My question for Katy ..."

Done, hadn't realized that I had them out of order. Reading months are still the same.

Katy wrote: "Done, hadn't realized that I had them out of order. Reading months are still the same."

Thanks for sating my anality Katy. Having re-read the Forsyte Saga a few years ago, I don't even plan to read it with the group so I was basically sticking my nose into something that doesn't affect me. Except it indirectly does since, as a great fan of the series, it pleases me when others also enjoy it. So it is in my self-interest that others reading it have the best reading experience possible.