Uganda cant read discussion

* "Secure borders" sounds nice and all but what does this entail? The thing conservative states are trying to do or doing goes well beyond that.

* "Safe and clean cities" are not achieved by strict drug laws and soft gun laws in the vicinity.

* Many spending people depend on more or less pay for themselves/are cheaper then the alternative and could be paid multiple times if superrich people and cooperation would pay their fair share in taxes with out any loopholes.

* I am with him on the racism thing, but there is a difference between systemic racism and the bs. some college student is spouting. If he really does not see the difference between the Democratic party and guy he is rooting for he is truly ignorant, maybe by choice but ignorant non the less.

* Ah the dog whistle against transsexuals - news flash Elon transition therapy is mostly reversible and not sterilization.

So yes if you go into details this thing is properly quiet right wing.

LerikU wrote: "* "Secure borders" sounds nice and all but what does this entail? The thing conservative states are trying to do or doing goes well beyond that.

* "Safe and clean cities" are not achieved by stric..."

A nation's survival hinges on its will to defend its own identity and people. A nation without **secure borders** is not a nation at all; it's merely a territory being invaded by those who dilute our culture and bring crime and drugs. This decay rots our cities from within, which can only be cleansed by strict **law and order**. We must punish the criminals who poison our communities while empowering law-abiding citizens to defend their own families.

This strength must also be economic. The Marxist lie that we can fund endless handouts by punishing our nation's job creators only serves to drive capital and jobs overseas, weakening us on the world stage. We must cut wasteful spending, not punish success.

Above all, we face a cultural war. We are told our history is evil by peddlers of "systemic racism"—a divisive myth designed to tear us apart. We are told to sacrifice our children to a gender ideology that mutilates their bodies and sterilizes them. We reject these lies. We stand for **biological reality**, the traditional family, and a proud, unified national identity.

Zabloing wrote: "LerikU wrote: "* "Secure borders" sounds nice and all but what does this entail? The thing conservative states are trying to do or doing goes well beyond that.

* "Safe and clean cities" are not ac..."
While I appreciate your passion for national identity and security, I must respectfully disagree with several points. A nation's strength is not solely defined by its borders or the strict enforcement of law and order. In fact, secure borders can be achieved through compassionate policies that recognize the value of diversity and the contributions of immigrants, rather than viewing them as threats. Cultures evolve and enrich one another, and embracing this change can lead to a more vibrant society rather than a decaying one.

Regarding the economic perspective, I believe that supporting job creators should not come at the expense of social welfare. Investing in our communities and providing support for those in need can actually strengthen our economy by creating a more educated and healthier workforce. Rather than cutting spending, we should focus on smart investments that uplift everyone, fostering a sense of unity rather than division.

As for the cultural aspects, acknowledging historical injustices does not equate to condemning our history; it is an opportunity for growth and understanding. Promoting inclusivity and acceptance does not undermine traditional values but rather enriches our collective identity. We can honor our past while also striving for a future that respects and uplifts all individuals, regardless of their background or identity.

Zabloing wrote: "LerikU wrote: "* "Secure borders" sounds nice and all but what does this entail? The thing conservative states are trying to do or doing goes well beyond that.

* "Safe and clean cities" are not ac..."

The amount of 'handouts' that so called 'job creators' receive is in far excess to that which the poor and middle class receive; an egregious example is the post -2008 bailout of banks. Mind you, the purpose of these handouts also differs, in that one utilizes government funds to bail out their businesses, which are profit generating and inherently exploitive of their workers, while the other class uses them for survival. One could argue that by keeping these businesses afloat, many individuals remain employed, however, it is also the case that the profit-maximizing nature of capitalists creates the economic malaise itself. For example, the 2008 crash was caused in no small part by banks egregiously financing mortgages so they can maximize profits.

It seems to me that these capitalists are the true source of wasteful spending, using government resources to maintain and nourish their positions as pseudo-feudalists while convincing the average individual that 'culture' is the real threat at hand. What is your 'culture' other than an economically motivated propaganda tool that keeps you, and your fellow workers, at constant conflict with one another?