Georgette Heyer Fans discussion

This topic is about
The Unknown Ajax
Group Reads
>
August 2025 - The Unknown Ajax - Spoilers
date
newest »



What I like particularly about this book is the stringent construction. There are quite a number of secondary characters and apparently unconnected events, but they all lead the reader inexorably toward the final drama. From the valets to Lady Aurelia, from the blacksmith to the painted ancestor: none of them could be spared. - GH is always good in plot construction and ensemble building, but this book, I think, stands out in this respect.

I can really appreciate the giants, too; what could be better than a man who is large, sweet and extremely competent?


Ajax was published in 1959. GH's usual romance is populated by gentry & nobility, with the occasional "commoner" thrown in often for comic effect. She comes across as a snob often enough - but not here. She elaborates nicely upon the comparison between Hugo's grandfathers, Lord Darracott and Mr. Bray, "t'gaffer". It's not a compliment for the upper class. The character of Hugo, hybrid by birth, humorous and totally unencumbered by class distinctions, is the link between them and makes sure that what could be a conflict remains a comedy.


I agree. I enjoy the entire book, but that final section is laugh-out-loud funny to me, no matter how many times I read this.


Enjoyed some of the words “roundaboutation” “fratch” but overall too much of unusual language for this reader.
I enjoyed the gigantic Hugo as male lead.
Overall not a favorite Heyer for me, I much prefer Venetia.

Enjoyed some of the words “roundaboutation” “fratch” but overall too much of unusual la..."
All the lingo, plus the dialect from some characters, can be a bit much. I struggled with this one until I listened to it on audio. That somehow opened it up for me, and now it's one of my favorites! So that might be something to keep in mind for a reread.


I'm not much of an audiobook person, but that is a good idea to try it that way.


I really love this book, but I'd agree that she isn't a star here. She's decent and likable, but not on the page a lot and not a really strong character. For me it's all about Hugo and how he treats everyone else. Plus I like my romance to have more of a plot than just the two people falling in love, and this one works really well for me. Add in the humor and I'm a big fan.
Now that I think about it - I'm a fan of her mysteries, too, and this almost reads like them. Footsteps in the Dark, perhaps?

don't forget she is the only one of the family who can keep step with Hugo's fibs and jokes. Their dialogues are hilarious.

Good point! It's what makes their scenes together so fun.

As a Yorkshire lass, I always liked Hugo’s joke on his family. However I always struggle with the way Heyer romanticised smuggling in her books- and in TUA, the way they treat the excise man.
The hideous and vicious violence of smugglers, including the notorious Hawkhurst Gang in the same area were nothing to admire or glorify. But here, it’s the usual Heyer device where the authorities have to be flouted to protect one of the family.
I agree that the romance is very much reduced to a non-story line.
Enjoyable but not one of my favourites.


I think I'll re-prioritize Quiet Gentleman and The Foundling higher on my to-read list.

I think those are some of my favorites, too. I already like mysteries, so that element is enjoyable for me, and I really like Heyer's sense of humor. It makes me happy.
The thread without spoilers is here.