Classics Without All the Class discussion
May 2015- Till We Have Faces
>
Before We Start
date
newest »


I love the kind of books that after you have read them, you discover that some parts of it are true. It makes me really excited and I try to know everything I can about the true side of it. In this way, the book is not spoiled, but rather acquires more depth as you keep investigating.
If i missed anything on the book because of my lack of knowledge of the true side of the story, I can always read it again. In this way... you get both approaches.





I'm in Book 2 right now and I'm excited to finish and then look up the myth again to draw some parallels!


As I see it there are two approaches to studying this book:
(1) Read and understand the classical myth before reading Lewis' book.
(2) Wait until after finishing this "myth retold" before investigating the story of Cupid and Psyche.
Clearly, reading the myth first will be a spoiler for reading Lewis' story. But, not knowing the myth first will cause us to miss some of the interesting angles and overlook hidden depths in this multi-layered story.
So, what do you think? Should we know the "myth" story before reading this book or shall we read the book and then learn about the myth afterwards?