JustAdventure+ Book Group discussion
Ender's Game
date
newest »


It's difficult to pinpoint what I liked about the book in particular, but I can say that I've always enjoyed how it portrays humanity when desperate, both as individuals and collectively as a species.
In the end I think Ender's Game is really a case of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. While one could put forward a number of tangible aspects of the story as reasons to like it, I think it's as much the interactions between its facets which make it great.
I read this book a few years ago at the behest of my boyfriend, who, despite being an absolute non-reader, loves and adores this book.
I think J. King hit the nail on the head when he said it's a case of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. In my case, I disliked many aspects of the book - I think it's likely I disliked more than I liked, even.
I really couldn't sympathise with the main character, I found some of the reactions to certain situations quite unbelievable and frustrating, and I think the ending was a cop-out. However... overall I did enjoy the experience. Why did I give it four stars? I'm not really sure. Do I think, personally, that it deserved four stars? On reflection, I think perhaps I feel it's a 3. However, seeing how many people enjoyed the book, including my boyfriend who refuses to read a thing but would defend this book with his life, I felt that the way the book touched so many people deserved a slightly bumped up rating.
Is it juvenile? A little. But the main character is just a boy. That being said, the main characters of Philip Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' trilogy were just kids, but nothing about the books were juvenile. While we're making the comparison, I mentioned that I found the way some situations were dealt with 'frustrating' - people have tried to defend this with the fact that the boy in the situations is so young, but given his supposed intellectual status, I believe that in the situations I spoke of, intelligence would have trumped immaturity or innocence. I never found the way Pullman's characters dealt with situations to be unbelievable in this way.
All that being said, I did enjoy the book, and I wish there was more buffer between the middle and the end - I would have gladly read more. I'd suggest you read the book, if only for the sake of reading a classic.
I think J. King hit the nail on the head when he said it's a case of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. In my case, I disliked many aspects of the book - I think it's likely I disliked more than I liked, even.
I really couldn't sympathise with the main character, I found some of the reactions to certain situations quite unbelievable and frustrating, and I think the ending was a cop-out. However... overall I did enjoy the experience. Why did I give it four stars? I'm not really sure. Do I think, personally, that it deserved four stars? On reflection, I think perhaps I feel it's a 3. However, seeing how many people enjoyed the book, including my boyfriend who refuses to read a thing but would defend this book with his life, I felt that the way the book touched so many people deserved a slightly bumped up rating.
Is it juvenile? A little. But the main character is just a boy. That being said, the main characters of Philip Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' trilogy were just kids, but nothing about the books were juvenile. While we're making the comparison, I mentioned that I found the way some situations were dealt with 'frustrating' - people have tried to defend this with the fact that the boy in the situations is so young, but given his supposed intellectual status, I believe that in the situations I spoke of, intelligence would have trumped immaturity or innocence. I never found the way Pullman's characters dealt with situations to be unbelievable in this way.
All that being said, I did enjoy the book, and I wish there was more buffer between the middle and the end - I would have gladly read more. I'd suggest you read the book, if only for the sake of reading a classic.
Thanks J and Arkadia, I'll request the book at my library in a few weeks time. :) (When I have a slight gap in my reading load)

I've just ordered it too, since both JKing and Arkadia seem to regard the book highly. I'd like to see what all the fuss is about; - especially since even films where based on the Ender saga.





He told me that he had enjoyed the first in the series: "Ender's Game" very much as a teenager. Sometime between then and now, I bought the book out of curiosity, but it didn't really sound my cup of tea, since I usually prefer more mature SF.
When my boyfriend triumphantly pointed me to reviews of the book on this site earlier this year, I did a bit of research, and was surprised to learn that this is actually a very much-acclaimed book.
So I put it on my shortlist; and am finally reading it.
I hope he sees this post and will be pleased to know that I will never doubt any of his recommendations again. (Well, not without trying them first, at least.. ;) )

Heh, and I hope he saw my post now... :P
(now that it is in the correct thread)

In your defence I didn't do a particularly good job of championing the book, so I don't blame you for being reluctant to give it a try. It's good to see you are giving it a try now, though, and I absolutely insist you keep me abreast of your impressions as you go. :)

Um, what gives me the feeling Dustin also checks this site from time to time? *innocent look*
Oh, and just btw, I did also get Matheson's "I am Legend" upon your recommendation, and will read it next, since I like to rotate my genres, and that one will most probably fall more into the "Dark Fiction" genre?
What is it about this book that you had found so good?
Care to tell, anyone?