Climate Change, Environment and Ecology discussion
Can local food systems avert future food crises?
date
newest »


The second question is access. For a family/individual buyer you have farmers markets, food co-ops, etc. but for a restaurant the issue is larger. How would you, efficiently and effectively, get the product to the restaurant in a timely way, in the right quantities, with the proper "ripeness" ?

Empires of Food: Why Civilization Revolves Around the Dinner Table as well as our first book Beef: The Untold Story of How Milk, Meat, and Muscle Shaped the World
Andrew's blog can be found at:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/t...

http://www.thetakeaway.org/2010/jul/0...
http://beta.wnyc.org/shows/lopate/201...

Inevitable
Like I said, its fiction. But one of the goals was to raise awareness.
Books mentioned in this topic
Inevitable (other topics)Empires of Food: Feast, Famine, and the Rise and Fall of Civilization (other topics)
Beef: The Untold Story of How Milk, Meat, and Muscle Shaped the World (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Andrew Rimas (other topics)Andrew Rimas (other topics)
Can local food systems avert future food crises?
On the “pro-side” I see that local food systems should be biologically diverse (ie local markets will demand a range of products that farmers will produce), involve less food miles (which hopefully reduces the carbon food print and our reliance on fossil fuels), and result in less soil degradation and water pollution (because nutrients will be able to be recycled because food production and consumption will be much closer together).
However, if a group of consumers depend on the local region, what happens if the local region suffers a bad drought? In this case, a global system may help reduce the risk that local production shocks will result in people going to bed hungry. Also, some areas are better suited to producing grain, while others better suited to dairy (etc.). It only makes sense to allow such regions to specialize and trade and if we had to be self sufficient in everything then food would be much much more expensive. Not only would this impose economic costs but environmental ones too as lots of the remaining forests and wetlands around our cities would be put under pressure to be converted to grain fields.
Obviously a balance of local and global is required (say a “glocal” system) but how this would play out would be extremely complicated.
I’d love to debate these issues if anyone was interested.
Evan