Language & Grammar discussion

Oh, look, here comes the newbie making her own thread. Might as well show some respect as tolerance hangs on a delicate strand unless dyed in blood or knotted with marital abhorrence.

Joyce is sweet. I think myself smug for flittering through the first twenty pages of Woolf or Joyce in meek shame at my yet illiterate mind which won't manifest the thought into a body, which is placed in a room, or a metaphorical room without walls, such as a cornfield or plastic-bottle-littered beach, and then bingo, I'm inside the author's head and his thoughts are mine and the words flow in and out of my lungs after the jumble of letters has been filtered through my ventricles and to the pulmonary artery which we often mistake for intelligence. I don't. And declaring a knowledge of my intelligence through negation of that knowledge, I contradict myself.

So, hello all, I am bonkers.

Bonkers can be fun........

Dropping by to say hi to you and you and you and you and youoooo.

Hey, Kitty. How's hubby?

Aish, clearly you've been smoking Joyce. But hey, look at the heights it took him to!

No greater joy than sharing the spliff. But two-in pass-it-round, 'k? See how joy is Joyce and Joyce is juice and juicy is beef and beef, hoof, woof all relate to animals?

Gabi dislikes huffy and Debbie likes 'em bonking, but Kitty is ululating and Newengland ever the Queen God needs to save.

Why bother? Same is like fidelity to thousands; different is monogamous promiscuity.

What's the use of being monogamous if you aren't going to covet your neighbor's wife?

Ooh, you tell me!

I didn't get married young enough to find out, unfortunately. I coveted several other men's wives when I was single, though. Does that count?

Poor excuse! A better one would've been the neighbor's fat smelly wife. :P

Trophy wives aren't usually fat and smelly.

Yea, now you have a good reason for your monogamity.

And, look, we're on the same page here! Q.E.D.