Creative Reviews discussion
Authors requesting reviewers
>
Self or Traditionally Published??
Of course if it is perfectly ok for you to post a new topic!! I hope everyone will if they have something new they would like to talk about! Way to go Cambria!!
I am not a published author by any stretch of the imagination, but from everything I have heard, sself publishing is NOT the way to go. A major drawback is that you have to cover all the expenses yourself. A good publishing company pays for all of the expenses while you sit and bask in the glory that you created something wonderful. Another bonus to a publishing company is they help take care of the promotion of your book! Just my 2 cents from the Random notes of Amy!! :-)
I am not a published author by any stretch of the imagination, but from everything I have heard, sself publishing is NOT the way to go. A major drawback is that you have to cover all the expenses yourself. A good publishing company pays for all of the expenses while you sit and bask in the glory that you created something wonderful. Another bonus to a publishing company is they help take care of the promotion of your book! Just my 2 cents from the Random notes of Amy!! :-)

The reason I ask is because I am a writer who has been searching for an agent and/or publisher for a long time. I am sure most of us know (and for those that do not) this can be very hard to do...especially if you are a new author.
So, here's the dilemma: should you let a really great book sit in a drawer b/c it is getting lost in the cracks or...should you maybe take a chance and self pub it and get it out there? And maybe make a name for yourself (Which i admit is very hard)?
It is true that publishing companies handle a lot of marketing for you....but I think to be successful a lot of marketing must be done by the author themselves. Personally, I plan to work just as hard at marketing either way I go. Naturally, it is expensive. But if you get published by a smaller traditional publisher (nothing wrong there I actually have my ms at one right now being considered) how much budget will they have for your marketing? won't some expense fall to the author anyway??
I'm torn on this topic....there are pros and cons to both sides...
looking forward to hearing everyones thoughts!
What type of book are you trying to get published? That will generally point you in the right direction as to what publishing companies to look into.
Prior to submitting to a publishing company, doing some research may be in order. Look up some of the authors from that publishing company and see if they would share ANY of their experiences with you. I think anyone who is publishing a book would want to help promote it at least a little....making a FB page for it and so on..
Prior to submitting to a publishing company, doing some research may be in order. Look up some of the authors from that publishing company and see if they would share ANY of their experiences with you. I think anyone who is publishing a book would want to help promote it at least a little....making a FB page for it and so on..

I would definitely wait until you have a deal in the works. You never know what may be in the contract for the publishing company that would pick you up, and you don't want to have one strike against you before you even get your foot in the door.
Let your work speak for itself. I'm sure it is fabulous, and some intelligent publisher will pick it up! Just keep trying, you will find the perfect match eventually!!
Let your work speak for itself. I'm sure it is fabulous, and some intelligent publisher will pick it up! Just keep trying, you will find the perfect match eventually!!


Hi Ottilie! Thanks for posting! So what's your opinion on this topic? You have a unique perspective because you have seen both sides. Which came first? Your self published book or the traditionally published book? Did the self pub maybe lead to the deal with the trad pub? Were they both good experiences and would you repeat both or maybe only one?

My thoughts exactly!(I mean about waiting until there is a deal in the works) What a great discussion Amy. Great talking to you!

To answer one of your posts about promoting a book that hasn't been published. I've been told that it can only HELP to create buzz about a completed work, published or not. Whet the appetite of fans. Also, although for now it's frowned upon by some publishers, many authors are epubbing and are later picked up by a traditional publisher, for example Amanda Hocking. For me, I'm done with looking for agents ect. Epubbing is the way.

I will say one thing about what you said that bookstores will become obsolete in years to come. i don't think thats true. Years ago the music industry was turned upside down with IPODS and downloaded music but still the number one sales in music is still in CD's (I learned this courtesy of Nathan Bransford's Blog). I think this way for books. I think the nostalgia of walking through a book store and even the excitement of walking through one with so many possiblities will keep bookstores around. I own an e-reader and I love it but you know there's something to be said for holding a book in your hands.
For me personally, the best day ever is going to be when i hold my published book in my hands. (heck, i'll probabaly sleep with it too) lol. :)

But we are authors, so on your point of quality. I can hire a copy editor, a content editor, a proofreader, a guy that says he likes to read. Professional copy editors can ensure quality just as well as anyone. Cover artists are in abundance out there and for a few hundred I can get great coverart. I can also approve or disapprove of the quality before I publish it. If you sign with someone, they make these decisions for you, for better or worse. Will you spend more time doing this, yes, but you will spend time on the phone with an editor talking about changes, ect. You would be smart to higher a lawyer, which takes more time, and then conversations with your agent, who will take a cut of your work. Its arguable whether or not all of this makes the work "better." My grandmother published 24 romance novels and she could write a book and submit it to her editor with no mistakes, and she had argue with young inexperienced editors who would introduce mistakes. they once printed one of her books with two of the same pages. Mistakes abound more than you would believe. there's a thread on this topic in the on the kindle message boards where authors talk about all the mistakes editors have made to their books. And if its a print book, they're there forever. There are a lot of smart people in NYC, but you can't compete with a product that can always be edited at anytime during its publication. Lots of people like book stores, me included, but when you can buy a book for 2.99 or .99 cents, pretty soon the nostalgia wears off. Plus, 50 percent of books are returned to the publisher unsold and are destroyed. Ebooks are better for the environment, and if you wanted a hard copy, lulu will print you one. I think its going to go the way of Vinyl records, where there will be a place for enthusiasts.
Lots to say! Good times!
I love my e-books, don't get me wrong, but I don't think there is anything that can replace the feeling of holding a brand new book in your hands. I think the e-book craze may dominate or a while, but I think bookworms, like myself, will always need the physical book in their collection, where it can't be lost in the midst of all the other digitalized titles. They are better for the environment, I will say that, but why not simply limit the amount of books a store can buy at a time?

Thanks for the convo amy, keep it coming.

I don't have any knowledge to add, but as an aspiring writer, it's an issue I have my eye on. Personally, the idea of being my own publicist frightens me, and that's what puts me off the idea of self-publishing. It doesn't play to my skills at all -- I'm completely inept at selling anything, let alone a book, let a lone a book I wrote...
Maybe that means I'm better suited to publishing, while others are better suited to self-publishing. Maybe it means I will just have to learn those skills. I'm not sure.


On the matter of quality, I totally agree. Editors and agents are people too and they make mistakes just as easily as you or I. A positive (for me) of self publishing is that the author does get more say in things. I already have the cover for my book designed in my head and I probably won't like it if a publisher tells me no. Has anyone here done a book with createspace or lulu? How hard is it? they make it look easy and I wonder how well the book comes out. Amanda Hocking did a few of her books in paperback but I haven't actually seen one. Same with e-pubbing. How hard is it at smashwords or B&N's Pubit! ? Is there a lot of formatting or do you simply upload?
Amy-limiting the number of books a bookstore can buy is a good thought and honestly i have no idea why they don't b/c a lot of them are returned. A lot of time the author is stuck paying for those returned too. And i agree-holding a book is sometimes better than an e-book :).

I don't have any knowledge to add, but as an aspiring writer, it's an issue I have my eye on. Personally, the idea of being..."
You know, Ben I like your honesty! I think a lot of writers feel this way about afraid of being their own publicist. If you think about it some writers are naturally introverted thats what makes them such great writers, they express themselves better on the page. Thats how they interact with people or maybe even the world around them. So for someone like this getting out there and being personable and trying to sell a book is terrifying. I think in those cases traditional publishing would be better. Because you do get more guidance and help with marketing.
I think that learning the skills to self pub is an option but if your not really into then people will feel that. However, with social networking it might be easier for an introvert to market becasue they could do it behind a computer. Just by joining groups (like this one!) you can getr out and know people without having to be face to face. FB and twitter along with a website can all be done pretty much behind the scenes and can be very effective marketing tools. (at least i think so).
I think really it comes down to choice and where you are most comfortable.
Thanks for your comment! Really great.
So what genre do you write or aspire to write?

Buying an e-book for .99 to 2.99$ is a really efective marketing tool in itself i think especially for a new author b/c people are more willing to take a chance on a book that didn't cost much. And if it's part of a series then you've probably hooked another sale. I agree that this pricing can compete with nostalgia. :)
Christopher- did your grandmother self pub any of her work or go through trad. pub every time? What an accomplishment! 24 romance novels is fabulous!
Also, just wondering-what genre do you write and is your self-pub e-book available now?

i'm not great with genres, but i think what i write is literary fiction, often with a seam of speculative fiction down the middle.

I write a little lighter stuff i guess you could say...I write YA paranormal.

I made the cover art myself.(what do you think?)
www.smashwords.com/books/view/49373.
Or
http://www.amazon.com/The-Travelers-C...
My Grandmother, Elizabeth Chater, wrote and published 24 traditional novels and tons of short stories. She died in 2002 so she never saw a kindle, but her former agent now sells her books online. I'm not sure what she would have thought of the ebook revolution. Probably not much. She loved science fiction, but I once tried to show her how to use a computer--she just wasn't having it.

I checked you book out via your link and it looks great! I like your cover art. The use of color and image placement is really nice and I can tell you put a lot of thought into it.
I will definitely be looking up your Grandmother's published novels as well. My grandmother is the same way with computers-completely uninterested. In fact, I am still trying to learn my way around them. There is so much to know.
For your cover art which software did you use to create it?





Awesome news! Thanks for the update!

Also, I'd put out your book to ebook first. There is a bit of a learning curve on formatting, but there are also some very good guides out there on doing it yourself, and some people who do the work well and very inexpensively. I did my own covers and formatting (I'm a bit of a geek), but I paid for professional editing and proofreading. I think you can put out a really high quality book as an indie, but you can also put out garbage, and it's up to the author to push for the former :).
I didn't do a print version, because I would have to charge almost $10 just to break even, and that seemed expensive. Most indie authors find 95% of their sales come from the ebooks.
The American Association of Publishers released numbers for February that say ebook sales are 30% of total fiction sales now. By the time a traditional publisher got your book to print, that will probably be 50%.
Good luck with whatever you choose, and sorry to write an essay on my first post here :).

It does seem that putting out the book yourself you are able to get more of the sales b/c traditionally published books are so much more costly to put out. i never really thought about it in terms of having to sell more as trad. published to make the same that you would as a "mid-list" self pub. It really bears a lot of thought!
Thank you so much for posting! I hope we talk again soon!
Don't apologize for the long post Debora, we love it, especially when you have such wonderful insight to share!!

The 70% vs. 8-12% doesn't include the amount of time put into the book and the selling of the book that publishers do, and that must have some equivalent monetary value, though. You must have to work pretty hard to offset that.
It amazes me how much of a market there seems to be for indie publishing. Outside of the internet, nobody I have ever spoken to has bought a book that wasn't traditionally published, unless it was written by a friend. (And because most of the internet is American, it makes me think it's a US thing, but that's probably not right.)

As far as the "market" for indie publishing - my book is on amazon, in a fantasy subcategory. People browse the category and buy my book. I don't think most readers know how a book was published. Some indie books make themselves obvious with a poor cover or bad editing, but I'd be willing to guess 80% of my readers have no idea I don't have a publisher. I don't know where you are, but I have a lot of international readers, too :).

I'm traditionally published (Awe-Struck Publishing) and it's working fine, but like so many other authors I'm working my butt off trying to market. And, believe me, I'm no marketer!

I too am interested to see how traditional publishing works out for Amanda Hocking. I have been following her story for a while now so it will be intersting to see what happens!

The problem with the large, New York press system is that it is a difficult institution to get into. Often times a book is judged on its sales in the first couple months, and they don't put all that much marketing into new authors. Of course, YA Paranormal is big right now, so that might be a different matter. If you can do well there, it's a good place to be. My friend who is going through the NY presses has been on this neverending book tour for about a year now. Since it's primarily East Coast, I'm assuming a lot of it's on her own dime. The general trend in publishing has been for the larger presses to publish fewer books and invest less in new and midlist writers.
Self-publishing is all your own thing. For this, eBooks are definitely better than printed books. If your book is of any length, you can price yourself out of the market on printing costs. However, I've seen people do this successfully and get offers from larger presses when the books are successful. However, I would emphasize the importance of having a good editor--not just a proofreader--whom you will have to find yourself. Here you are completely on your own for marketing, and I would suggest not so much marketing your book before it's published so much as getting very familiar with your audience so you don't make mistakes once you do start marketing.
Things vary with a small press. I went with Eraserhead Press. Marketing mostly my responsibility, but I have access to authors who have been successful in this genre, one of whom spent a lot of time editing my book with me. If you are working with a single-genre small press, having access to that community can be important. The press also has existing arrangements with printers and distributors. These are useful things.
Since you are specifically in the YA market, I wonder how important the school connection is. I think it will be very difficult to get a self-published book into school libraries, book fairs, and the like, but I haven't researched YA.

I think about marketing a lot and I think that a lot of it falls to the author no matter what especially if you are new. I also agree that having that network of other authors like you do can be important in an authors success.
Self publishing print books can get costly but I wonder if doing one on a site like createspoace would be as exspensive and if maybe going that route along with an e book would be a smart route to go.
Personally this is what I am considering. I have my ms out at a small trad pub and I am waiting (sigh) to hear back. If it is a no then I am pretty sure I will move ahead with the self pub.
Are you glad that you went with a small trad pub? How has the success been with your book? Do you think anything would have been better or worse if u had went the self pub route?
Thank you for your insight!

I think you are correct that whatever route you go you are pretty much alone for marketing.
I have my doubts about self-publishing through a service. Robin Sullivan, whose husband wrote the Crown Conspiracy series, gives free seminars in DC about how you can do everything the services do cheaper and better yourself.

But definitely, if you can find an editor you know, trust, and admire, you can put out a good book. It helps if you know authors working in the same genre.

There are lots of reasons to consider traditional publishing, but I don't think editing is one of them. First, many publishing houses are making severe cuts in their editing staff, and a lot of new authors only get a copy edit (and not always a very good one). Second, you can hire the same people many of the small presses use for editing.

I think traditional publishing has a few pluses too in the way of guidance and product placement. And also they have more experience in getting the book ready and out. A lot of self pub authors just aren't that familar w that side of the business. Plus I have heard many self pub authors say that doing themselves all the things that a publisher would do for them takes away their writing time.
I really think that it depends on the individual whether or not self pub is a good idea. Good quality can come from self pub but it takes a lot of effort and know how. I think that is what holds me back most from just going ahead w self pubbing...fear that the finished product won't be as good as it could be and that I don't know enough to do it.

The feedback and reviews have been great but ,as some reviews noted, the product wasn't as good as it could have been with some quality editing. So now I've started the proces of searching for a good editor (at a reasonable price would be a huge bonus). Problem is I have no idea how to find a "good" one. My guess is it's a different process than just googling "editor" or "copy-editor". If anyone has any suggestions (other than punt, although that could be sound advice), it would be much appreciated.
for the authors out there....
Did you publish our book yourself or have you gone with a traditional publisher?