Discovering Russian Literature discussion
NEW MEMBERS, INTRODUCTIONS
>
Suggestions and Comments From the Group
I'm currently interested in your thoughts about these new ideas from some of our group members:
Side-Read discussions on more contemporary writings
Play/Drama reading as a separate part of group-reading
Say 'Yes' to your choice/s
-----------------------
I say YES to Play/Drama reading
Side-Read discussions on more contemporary writings
Play/Drama reading as a separate part of group-reading
Say 'Yes' to your choice/s
-----------------------
I say YES to Play/Drama reading

As a general rule I'm interested in long fiction, although I might join in occationally on other reads.



Try the library. It is the only way I can afford to read as much as I do!! :)


Diversity is the spice of life, though I can understand how that might be to the chagrin of someone who wants to do it all.
I would also suggest including Poetry with Drama as a separate section, though how that would work, I'm not sure.
Suggestions: a fiction reading of classic Russian lit every two months so there is adequate time to read the novels. A monthly reading of plays/poetry/stories of both contemporary and classic writers. Of course, that leaves the question of when to read longer works of fiction by more contemporary authors--consider them a part of the longer readings every two months?





Dovlatov==a new author to me. Always like discovering things--thanks!

Also, has anyone read Evgenia Ginzburg's 'Journey into the Whirlwind'? That's high up on my list.
And yes to Brothers K!

Also, has anyone read Evgenia Ginzburg's 'Journey into the ..."
Into the Whirlwind is one of my favorites.
Have you read Eyewitness Auschwitz? It is horrific.




For what it's worth, the Russian translator I respect most hates P/V. She says they are not translators but transcribers.
I read Russian, but not if I am reading for pleasure. So my comment is more personal and less categorical. When I read the Garnett translation of Anna Karenina, I loved the book. When I read the new P/V translation, I stopped, bored to tears, on p. 100. Was that the fault of the translation? Not sure. I may just be less tolerant of 19th-century exposition these days.
One person's view. But I would also note that the Garnett translations are often free, or at least very low cost.
C.P. wrote: "When I read the Garnett translation of Anna Karenina, I loved the book. When I read the new P/V translation, I stopped, bored to tears, on p. 100. Was that the fault of the translation? Not sure. I may just be less tolerant of 19th-century exposition these days...."
I agree with Anna Karenina's Garnett translation. I own it and I had no problem with it and true, most of the e-book available in Garnett translation.
However, personally I didn't like her treatment of Dostoevsky. Tolstoy, I guess it ok. But I think the readers should be grateful to her because she's the person who made the English readers to access Russian literature.
I agree with Anna Karenina's Garnett translation. I own it and I had no problem with it and true, most of the e-book available in Garnett translation.
However, personally I didn't like her treatment of Dostoevsky. Tolstoy, I guess it ok. But I think the readers should be grateful to her because she's the person who made the English readers to access Russian literature.
C.P. wrote: "For what it's worth, the Russian translator I respect most hates P/V. She says they are not translators but tra..."
That's very interesting to hear! But they do have good arguments on why P/V beats Garnett. Here's a link
From the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography:
http://www.oxforddnb.com/
"Constance Garnett's requirements for a good translation were sympathy for the author and a love of words and their meanings. She herself had faults: her dialogues are sometimes stiff; her transliteration of Russian names is illogical and inconsistent; she makes many errors. But the speed at which she worked, which was partly to blame for these, allowed her to maintain stylistic unity. Her descriptive passages are often exquisitely done and she eschews linguistic fads or slang. Conrad, for whom Turgenev was Constance Garnett, compared her to a great musician interpreting a great composer. For Katherine Mansfield, Constance Garnett transformed the lives of younger authors by revealing a new world. Without her translations, H. E. Bates believed, modern English literature itself could not have been what it is (Bates, 120)."
@ Amalie
Her Brothers K of Dostoevsky was good.
That's very interesting to hear! But they do have good arguments on why P/V beats Garnett. Here's a link
From the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography:
http://www.oxforddnb.com/
"Constance Garnett's requirements for a good translation were sympathy for the author and a love of words and their meanings. She herself had faults: her dialogues are sometimes stiff; her transliteration of Russian names is illogical and inconsistent; she makes many errors. But the speed at which she worked, which was partly to blame for these, allowed her to maintain stylistic unity. Her descriptive passages are often exquisitely done and she eschews linguistic fads or slang. Conrad, for whom Turgenev was Constance Garnett, compared her to a great musician interpreting a great composer. For Katherine Mansfield, Constance Garnett transformed the lives of younger authors by revealing a new world. Without her translations, H. E. Bates believed, modern English literature itself could not have been what it is (Bates, 120)."
@ Amalie
Her Brothers K of Dostoevsky was good.

Janice


I hope it's fine if I chime in.


P&V are probably fine. So far I've seen only their Karenina and it is the closest to the original I could find. I checked word for word. (I'm a Russian speaker)
Anya wrote: "Don wrote: "Hi, Just checking to see if there is a March group read? Hope all is well with all the moderators. This is a great group."
I second this idea!"
Sorry for not being around. I was in a tight schedule and didn't have enough time to be online. Will let you know about the new plans soon!
I second this idea!"
Sorry for not being around. I was in a tight schedule and didn't have enough time to be online. Will let you know about the new plans soon!


Feel free to open a discussion about it. I think it would be interesting.

There were some in the past but weren't that active, there aren't a lot of active members in this group:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
Usually I do the quizzes and trivia questions we can find in the book page, on the right side.
For example: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...
On the right, above "quotes".
Or you can also click on "explore" on the top of the homepage and click on "trivia" and "quizzes" and look there for something about Russian literature.

There were some in the past ..."
I took the fist quiz on authors and poets . Really good stuff !!. This is exactly what I was talking about. Please keep it up ! I joined this group recently so missed all the fun.

Since Russian Sci-Fi and Fantasy is part of Russian Literature it would fit the group. If you (or anybody else) open this thread, i would support it (by reading and participating). Fantasy is a native genre for the Russian lit (starting with Nikolai Gogol), and Sci-Fi was one of the few genres where it was still somewhat possible to express oneself during the Soviet era. I am absolutely ignorant of what has been written in Russian Sci-Fi in the last decades. Would enjoy to explore... And it seems our group needs some refreshment anyway. A new thread might do the trick.
Andrea wrote: "I'd like to see a forum, or thread, on Russian Sci-Fi and Fantasy, if you think it fits the group. If you don't think it fits, can you think of another group on Goodreads where I could find someth..."
I was not around for almost a month, I can see you've already started a thread. It's nice to see such willingness for participation and new ideas. I can move the thread to "Contemporary Fiction" folder and mark it "important" to prioritize it, if you like. Feel free to ask anything, this is a group open for new ideas.
I was not around for almost a month, I can see you've already started a thread. It's nice to see such willingness for participation and new ideas. I can move the thread to "Contemporary Fiction" folder and mark it "important" to prioritize it, if you like. Feel free to ask anything, this is a group open for new ideas.

Abram wrote: "I read a lot of French literature(Camus etc). I believe I lot of that literature is influence by Russian literature to some degree. Is there any room to discussing non-Russian literature that is ..."
At the moment, I'm not sure but I'll consider it.
At the moment, I'm not sure but I'll consider it.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Impossible History of Trotsky's Sister (other topics)The First Circle (other topics)
I felt, there were some confusions about "August Nominations" from both members side and mine. So here, this topic is open for any suggestions for the moderator (me), or to get feedback from the group or anything else, that you don't know where else to comment!
Any other ideas, share it here. I'd like this place continue to be a good reading group.