Outlander
discussion
Can it possibly get better than the 1st and 2nd books?


You didn't read past the first book??? You don't know what you're missing!

I just started the Outlander series and cant take my eyes out of the book!! I am just about to finish Dragonfly in Amber and cant imagine there to be 6 more book to read in the series!!..."
I am a big Diana fan but personally didn't like the Lord John books - guess I am just in love with Jamie Fraser! Dragonfly in Amber is my all time fave and then the Drums of Autumn. She is an amazing author:)


Oh I forgot about Voyager! Yes I love that too - think I will have to go back and read again from the start:)





me too!





I'm a huge fan of the series! I got the first as a gift and I couldn't stop reading! I really liked the second and, in my opinion the third is my favourite!
Right now I'm finishing The Fiery Cross and they are all worth reading.
Caro


I had the same problem with Fiery Cross. I think the first day lasted the first 200 pages but after that I couldn't put it down.




spolier they get to see each other again
@annie and @sandi i agree with feiry cross it seem to drag a bit to much in the begining that it was a bit hard to get through



I'm with you on Outlander being the best. I read Dragonfly in Amber, but was disgusted about the extramarital stuff with the King of France. I started Voyager but couldn't continue when Jamie did the maid, and I can't imagine reading Jamie with that Leghair person. Yuck.
I really wish DG did not skip 20 years, that Claire was able to go back to Scotland with Brianna while Jamie was still young. I feel the 20 years were wasted spending it with Frank.

I never thought of that. I will reread it with that in mind and see if it changes my perspective.





Re: the audio books I agree whole heartedly about Davina Porter, she is amazing!



Jamie thought Claire was dead and vice versa, I don't begrudge him his time with Mary McNabb or Laoghaire at all, he was trying to move on with his life

And I'm sure Claire would not have just resigned herself that Jamie was dead and forgotten him for twenty years. Besides with Claire around and her resourcefulness he might not have had to hide in the cave 7 years or been in jail or anything. She could have come back with some serious weapons and maybe even a rescue team.

and coming back with serious weapons/a rescue team...and totally change the course of history - yeah not, that would have ruined the whole series

If Claire had gone back with 'serious weapons and a rescue team', it would have changed the course of history irrevocably, but also even then he was still a criminal and he would still have been hunted. He couldn't go through the stones, so then they would have had a baby and been on the run constantly. Or how about how Jamie turned himself in so that he could get the reward money for his family. If they had stopped that it may have cost him the lives of some of his family members.
Was it sad? Sure, absolutely. BUt again, it's this strife and sacrafice that makes Jamie and this book so amazing.

Not to give any spoilers away but, you know, by the end of Echo in the Bone, I felt that DG had overshot the maximum number of "I thought you were dead!" scenes needed for the series. Or for any series.
Wendy F wrote: "What makes this series so amazing is how she tries to handle things with realism. It's gritty and powerful, and part of that is because she doesn't pull punches. Bad things happen.
If Claire h..."
Well said! It is exactly those 20 years that make it so remarkable when they do reunite!
Also, Claire had another troubled pregnancy she says that; had she had Brianna in the 18th century they both would have died! Plus she thought Jamie was dead, and going on in life with Briana was the only way she could honor Jamie's life.
If Claire h..."
Well said! It is exactly those 20 years that make it so remarkable when they do reunite!
Also, Claire had another troubled pregnancy she says that; had she had Brianna in the 18th century they both would have died! Plus she thought Jamie was dead, and going on in life with Briana was the only way she could honor Jamie's life.


I just started the Outlander series and cant take my eyes out of the book!! I am just about to finish Dragonfly in Amber and cant imagine there to be 6 more book to read in the series!!..."
Yes they all get better...still waiting for more to come.

Beyond that, once the story moved away from Jamie and Claire, I found that I just didn't care as much. There are so many characters in play by the time FC starts, that it gets hard to keep track of them all. I haven't even read Echo in the Bone. I tried to re-read ABOSAA awhile ago to refresh my memory on all that happened, and I didn't make it a quarter of the way through. It's sad, really. Outlander is the only book on my shelf that I've read more than twice (at present count, I've read it 5 times). I'm bummed that they went so downhill after book #4.

Unfortunately, Echo in the Bone also dragged on. Way too much American history,and I really got sick and tired of each and every character ever mentioned in any of the novels reuniting in America.
On the plus side of that, it brought home the fact of how heavily the Scots settled the mountainous regions of our States, plus areas of Canada, as close to their homeland as they could be without setting foot on their native soil.
When I was much younger, I actually noticed the relationship between Scottish accents and the modern day Southern accent, in the Carolinas, particularly. Now I understand why.

all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Outlander (other topics)
Outlander (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Outlander (other topics)Outlander (other topics)
Outlander (other topics)
I just started the Outlander series and cant take my eyes out of the book!! I am just about to finish Dragonfly in Amber and cant imagine there to be 6 more book to read in the series!!!!
Are the rest of the books in the series as good as the first two??
What s your personal favorite title in the series?
Kyla