Middlesex
discussion
Why is he called Chapter Eleven?
date
newest »



I had the same problem. I kept thinking it had to do with the eleventh chapter and kept trying to analyze it. Oh that's embarrassing xb


It bothered me too..."
Well the child wasn't really named that... just like the Object wasn't really named that either. I believe it was a device used to express the distance and mood/feeling between those characters and cal.


After a while I became accustomed to his mysterious name.

Me too lol. I skipped to that chapter and skimmed it but couldnt find an answer. Never thought about the bankruptcy angle. Man do I feel stupid....


I don't really think noting it as a spoiler alert is necessary because why would you be browsing through this thread if you hadn't read the book yet?



Thanks for this explanation. I read the book some time ago and liked it, but I could not find the reasoning behind this name. :)

I don't think it's a spoiler since the answer is apparently never divulged by the narrator (as so many people were confused by it). This is the height of arrogance on the part of the author, who is not interested in anyone getting the joke because he's so pleased with his own cleverness. I read the book a long time ago, but this thread reminds me how I wasted a good deal of time pondering this issue. I liked a lot about the book, but Jeffrey Eugenides is too in love with himself and needs to learn to EDIT.

It isn't a joke. He refers to him as chapter 11 because that is what he does to the business, ruins it, therefore, claiming bankruptcy = chapter 11.



http://www.oprah.com/oprahsbookclub/M...
All you readers who suspected Chapter 11 bankruptcy were spot on.

This is such a common term in American business, I'm a little bit amazed that some people haven't heard of it. Googling "Chapter 11" returns 374,000,000 hits. Just apropos nothing in particular, that's twenty times as many as Oprah gets.




This book contains many, many instances of foreshadowing as explained by the "gun on the mantel" reference. Through this reference, the author promises that anything not immediately explained will be revealed by the end of the story, and I feel as though that promise was delivered on in a excellent and clever way.
Not for the faint of heart, Middlesex is a book written for "people who read books" and I loved the subtlety which which the story is told. Definitely a re-read for me as I feel as though the second reading will uncover many gems skimmed over in my first read.


I started it over again a few weeks later. There is so much that a second read is worth it.

I agree with reviewer Cary, who said JE is too clever and arrogantly pleased w/ himself to think/edit this bit. It seems rude to the reader. But still reading the book, expecting it to be a great read, nonetheless.
I dislike the high toned judgement of reviewer Darrell, who so patronizingly clarifies for Sally the difference between “read” vs. “listen”. How absurd and pedantic. Many MANY intelligent and successful people say they “read a book” to which they merely listened. Get over it. It’s colloquial. Furthermore, Sally never said she wasn’t *interested* in the topic of Middlesex. Clearly she was; she chose it to read. She merely said parts of the book could make you question your own sexuality, which could be hard for some people. These are true words. What’s the problem with that statement?
People read self help books containing difficult possible truths to read, but they soldier on. Interest does not equate to ease of reading. In fact, in many cases, “difficult” books are the ones we should be reading!
Sally saying parts of the writing dragged, but the narrator did a fantastic job, is not the same as saying she is not interested in the topic. Others have said the same about the writing style.
Judging from “Chapter 11”, I will agree.


I agree with your comments on the use of foreshadowing in the book and that the book is 'for people who read books'. There is the feel of an intellectual exercise at times. I do think this can somewhat take away from the telling of the story.
I liked the descriptions and the language use but I felt overall the main theme of interest to me prior to reading was the sexuality of the main character and I think this could have been dealt with a bit more.
The background stories are well observed but I felt a little let down at the end that I didn't gain any huge insight into the main character's identity issues and how they were resolved.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
But can somebody please explain if there is any significance in naming a person 'Chapter Eleven'. Is that a joke on the Readers?