nastya ’s Reviews > Foucault’s Pendulum > Status Update

nastya
is on page 300 of 623
This has been fun… for a while. And now I am praying for it to end. He doesn't care about his reader, does he? Explains his love for Borges I guess..
— Jul 25, 2025 09:37PM
12 likes · Like flag
nastya ’s Previous Updates

nastya
is on page 427 of 623
This is like a once-funny joke that went on for way too long. What am I missing?
— Jul 30, 2025 10:27AM

nastya
is on page 310 of 623
Авжеж. Людство не може стерпіти думки, що світ народився випадково, через помилку, лише тому, що чотири безмозкі атоми зіткнулися на мокрому шосе. А тому треба знайти космічну змову, Бога, янголів або дияволів. Синархія виконує ту саму функцію, лише у зменшених масштабах.
— Jul 26, 2025 11:07AM

nastya
is on page 106 of 623
Can you call yourself a coward simply because the courage of others seems to you out of proportion to the triviality of the occasion? Thus wisdom creates cowards. And thus you miss Opportunity while spending your life on the lookout for it. You have to seize Opportunity instinctively, without knowing at the time that it is the Opportunity.
— Jul 15, 2025 08:58AM

nastya
is on page 53 of 623
I firmly believed that an egalitarian society was dawning, but I also thought that the trains, for example, in this better society ought to run better, and the militants around me were not learning how to shovel coal into the furnace, work the switches, or draw up timetables. Somebody had to be ready to operate the trains.
— Jul 07, 2025 12:51PM

nastya
is on page 43 of 623
Fans of this book, I have very little idea about what is happening. Is it expected or is this book not for me? Should I dnf or continue?
— Jul 02, 2025 08:28AM
Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Alexandra
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 25, 2025 10:17PM

reply
|
flag

I wonder if the editor's watchful eye ever saw this text or she would've said, 'dude, the middle sags so much it needs a facelift asap' only for him to ignore her and publish it anyway? :)


fine with playfulness, less so with huge infodumps about conspiracy theories through the ages, but that's me, not the topic I am interested in without the author's effort to present it in an interesting way, you know?
